Gilliam v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail, No. 7:2017cv00085 - Document 9 (W.D. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 4/5/2017. (slt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CL S OFFI U.S. SE COURT ERK' CE DI AT RG NOKE, VA FI LED APR 26 2 1 27 I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT JUL FO R T H E W ESTER N DI STRI T O F V I GI I BY C R N A : R O AN O K E DI SI N VI O MI CHAEL CORNELI GI AM , US LLI , CLERK . ER Ci lAc i No.4: 7- vvi ton 1 c 00085 Pl ntf ai if, M EM O RA ND U M O PI O N NI SO UTHW EST VI NI REGI RGI A ONAL JM L , D ef endant . By: H oh. i hae F.U r M c l bans ki Unie St e Dit i Judge t d at s s rct M iha lCo nei Gila ,aVigi ai t pr e di pr K ,sl ac c e r lus lim r ni nma e oc e ng o ed ompli ant p ru n t 4 U. C. 1 3n migteS uh s VignaRe ina J i(7a1)a t es l u s a t o 2 S. j 98 n n h o twe t r i i go l al ç i' s h oe ' d f n a t Thsmatri beo et c u to s r e n pu s n t 28U. C.j1 5 e e d n . i te s f r he o r f r ce nig rua t o S. 91 A. Thec t tdimist co ai be us t J li notn bl t s tvi j 1 our mus s s he mpl nt ca e he ai s mena e o ui a 983, a t ,i f ist sa eacli upon whih r le m a be g a e Se e. ,W ilv. ihi n nd hus t a l o tt am c e if y r nt d. e. g. l M c ca De t fSaeP lc , 91U. 5 , 0 71( 9 9 ; etv At n , 8 U.. 2 4 ( 9 8 p'o tt o ie 4 S. 8 7 - 1 8 ) W s . kis 4 7 S 4 , 8 1 8 ) (ec zi aj1983cl m mus al t vi ai ofafde a rg byaperonadi t r r ogni ng ai t lege he olton e rl iht s ng mde c lro saelw) P e a v. n , 7F. p 2 3 7 31 ( D. . 9 9 (( h Pid n oo f tt a ; r v l Re o 5 Su p. d 0 , 0 E. Va 1 9 ) 1 TJ e e mo t : Re i n l al sn taC e s n, a dtee o en t me a et s it e 4 U. C. 1 3.) go a J ii o ' ro ' n h r f r o a n bl o ut md r 2 S. j 98 ' , p ' ' a fdt p t a drv' i p r, 3F.d8 (t Ci. 0 ) rp re i f l-e t o ma a 20 0 f' q at n e d q a t20 3 21 4h r 20 0 ,e o td n ultx f r t t 0 U. Ap LEXI 4 , t* , 0 0W L 20 9 , t# (ç-ec u t lop o ryd tr n dt t S. p. S 65 a 3 2 0 5 1 a 1 tl o r as r pel eemie ha -h t Pidm o Re o lJ i i nota ç r o a i t r f r no n e bl t s tt r he e nt gi na a l s pe s n' nd s he e o e t m na e o ui mde Gilliam v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail j1 3( ' . 98 .' q) Doc. 9 Tot ee tn Plitf ma b a l t n meaI e s n's b e t os i v aj1 8 , litf h x e t an if y e be o a i ro ' u j c t u t i 9 3 P an if p i gr nt d s ve da t fl a a e d compl ntt tsa e ac am upo whi h r le may be s a e e n ys o ie n m nde ai ha tt s l i n c ei f grntd.Se e. ,Gor v. e 57 F. 11 11 ( h Ci.1 ) I t c tdoe not a e e. g. don Le ke, 4 2d 47, 52 4t r 978 . f he our s Dockets.Justia.com r c i a hi fom Pl ntf t n f te da ,t Clr s l srket c e fo t e e ve nyt ng r ai ifwihi oure n ys he e k ha l ti he as r m he aci doc t Howeve ,Pli ifwilsilbeabl t r iehi cai i ane a s pa a e tve ke . r a ntf l tl e o efl s l ms n w nd e r t a to a t etmeo hi c oc s j c t tea plc b el tto p ro .Se . ..Owe sv. ci n t h i f s h ie ube t o h p ia l i ains ei d e eg, n mi Okle 48 U. 2 5 2 9 5 ( 9 9 . T t , 8 S. 3 , 4 - 0 1 8 ) r I EN TER : s Thi a 1 da of) Jk 201 y , 7. f f* 'z'- A.W &-#x w r '1 ' , . U nie St t sD i t i tJ ge t d a e sr c 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
