Hungate v. Harts et al, No. 7:2017cv00056 - Document 11 (W.D. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 3/20/2017. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CLERK' A KAu .sos c u S oFyl N K l o f T cE O' > m . E, I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FO R TH E W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI GI A CT R NI ROANOKE DI I ON V SI FIE LD MA2 2 2 2 1 27 J I c. u A BY: STEV EN E.H UN GA TE , Pl ntff ai i , C i lA cton N o.7: cvvi i 17- 00056 V. M E M O M N D UM O PIN IO N H ARTS,e al t , By: nl ppzY ' <' L . De e a t) f nd nts. c M i hae F.Urbans c l ki Unie St t Dit i tJudge t d a es s r c S e e E. n ae p o e dn p oK ,ie acvl ih sc mplitpu s n t 42U. C. tv n Hu g t, r c e ig r fld iirg t o an , rua t o S. j 1 983, hie i a ce a e By is Or re e e Fe a y 1 201 t c ta s d pl i ift ta w l nc r r t d. t de nt r d bnz r 4, 7, he our dvi e a ntf ha f l et upda eam a lng add e safe ata f rorr l a efom i a ce a i wilr s ti dim is l aiur o t ii r s tr r ns e e e s r nc r r ton l e ul n s s a oft saci n. hi to Th c u tsmalop an ifh sb e rt r e ( No 1 )a u ei rb e a dp anif s e o r' i t litf a e n eu n d ECF . 0 s nd l a l, n litf ha ve notc a t d t c tsnc Fe a y 22,201 ont c e he our i e bnzr 7. Pli iff ld t c a ntf aie o ompl wih t c tsOr r y t he our' de r quii pl n ift mai ai a a ur t maii a e s The e or t c u'fndst tpli iff ie e rng aitf o nt n n cc a e lng ddr s . r f e, he ot t s ha antf a ld t pr e ut t saci plrua tt Fe r lRul ofCi lPr e e41b) bynotc mpl ngwiht o os c e hi ton, zs n o dea e vi oc dur ( , o yi t he c u tsFe nzr 2 201 , d r c r igy Id s s t ea to wi u p eu iea d n al o r' b a y 2, 7 Or e .Ac o dn l, imis h cin t t rj d c nd e y 1 ho p n i gmoinsa mo t Se Balr v. rs n, 8 F.d9 , 6( t Ci.1 8 )(ttn p oK e d n to s o . e l d Ca lo 8 2 2 3 9 4h r 9 9 sai g r a ltg nsaes be t otmerq ie n sa drs e tfrc u t r e sa d s s a i a a p o rae ii a t r u j c t i e ur me t n e p c o o r o d r nd imis l s n p r p it s n to f rn n c mpin e ; n el v. o n - a v leS lsCo , 7 F.d 3 9 3 - (dCi. a cin p o -o la c ) Do n l J h sM n il ae m.6 7 2 3 , 4041 3 r y 1 2 (e o nzn ad src c u t ys as o t ds s a a to pls a t oFe . Ci P. ( ). 98 ) r c g iig itit o r ma u p n e imis n cin t u n t d R. v. 41b) r TheClr i die t d t s ndcopisoft sM e o a l Opi o andt ac ompa ng Or r ek s rce o e e hi m r ndtm ni n he c nyi de Hungate v. Harts et al Doc. 11 t t partes. o he i ENTER : s Thi day ofM a c 201 r h, 7. /+/ ! w A. ë e -- . AF - ë -c1 )' 1 ,2m. ' y . '. ': '1 $ 1 1 U nie St t sD i t i tJ ge t d a e sr c u Dockets.Justia.com / r . -- i.
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
