Thompson v. Clarke et al, No. 7:2017cv00010 - Document 147 (W.D. Va. 2018)
Court Description: ORDER granting in part and denying in part 56 Motion for Summary Judgment ; The motion is DENIED as to Thompson's claim (2)(E) alleging that defendant Doss, in his individual capacity, failed to protect him from obtaining a razor in segregation to harm himself. The motion is GRANTED as to all other claims and defendants (Opinion and Order mailed to Pro Se Party). Signed by Senior Judge Norman K. Moon on 3/31/2018. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Thompson v. Clarke et al Doc. 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION PAUL C. THOMPSON, JR., Plaintiff, v. H. W. CLARKE, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 7:17cv00010 ORDER By: Norman K. Moon United States District Judge In accordance with the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendants’ motion (Docket No. 56) for partial summary judgment as to Count (2) of the complaint is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is DENIED as to Thompson’s Claim (2)(E) alleging that defendant Doss, in his individual capacity, failed to protect him from obtaining a razor in segregation to harm himself. The motion is GRANTED as to all other claims and defendants. ENTER: This 31st day of March, 2018. Dockets.Justia
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
