Williams v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 7:2016cv00562 - Document 3 (W.D. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 1/5/2017. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
. ; : . ' CLERK' OFFI U. Dl cotr S CE S. sm i gq ( -.y( j; VA j- y ' ;j , L ;i.t:1i( -'* :. 1 J 25 2 1 AN 27 I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FO R TH E W ESTERN D I STR I OF VI G I A CT R NI R O AN OK E DI I O N V SI DW AYNE L.W I AM S, LLI Peii r ttone , v. COM M ONW EALTH OF VI NI RGI A, Re ponde . s nt ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) J LA ( .u Ul ) , sy: D CASE NO.7: 16CV00562 M EM OM NDUM OPI ON NI By: Ho GlnE. nr n. e Co ad ChifUnie St t sDititJudge e td a e src Dwa L.W iln s a Vigi a i a epr e ng pr K ,s itd a t oto i bre yne li m , r ni nm t oc edi o ubm te G i n n if m a r pl 't t s c t al gi t t hi a t ne i a uns cii d Vigi a ti lc thad a nd e y' o hi our, le ng ha s tor y n n pe fe r ni ra our pe ng c i i lc r f r a dr ofe e butdi nots a s W ila s Be a e W ilnms ndi rm na ha ge o ug f ns , d o dvie lim . c us li a p ast b c aln i gt v ldt o hi c n i e n t e asaec u t rmia j dg n , p e r o e h le g n he aiiy f s o fn me t md r tt o r ci n l u me t t c r c tu a doc t hi s he ou t onsr ed nd keed s ubmi so c to ly asa pe ii f a wrtofha as s i n ondii nal tton or i be c r ust e 28 U.S C.j 2 5 By o d r e tr d De e e 2 201 ,t c u tn t d o p md r . 2 4. r e n ee c mb r , 6 he o r oi fe W ila o t i c n tu to a r q ie s eCatov. td S ae , 4 U. . 75 3 7( 0 3 , lims f h s o sr ci n s e urd, e sr Uni tts 5 0 S 3 , 7 2 0 ) e a d o t er q ie n frhm t s b ta a n e j2 5 p tto sg d u de p n l of n f h e urme t o i o u mi n me d d 2 4 ei n, ine n r e at i y p ru y i h itn e frt ec u toa d e sh scamsu d rj2 5 . ej r ,f e n e d d o h o r t d r s i li n e 2 4 S csc l t c u t ie tdW iln t s b tt t c u t t n 1 d y et r() pe i al he o r dr ce lims o u mi o he o r wi y, hi 4 a s i 1 he h sd ca ai n sg e u d rpe at o pej r saigt a hi o icin t tec u tsitnin i e lr to , in d n e n ly f ru y, ttn h t s be to o h o r' n e to t a d e shss b sinsa aj2 4 h b a peiin pg 2 a c mp ee j2 5 pei o f r o d r s i u miso s 25 a e s t o . ( ) o ltd 2 4 t in o m, t l t 1 Williams v. Commonwealth of Virginia sg e u d r pe at o pej r s tig f rh a sae n o hi cams f r h be s r l f in d n e n ly f ru y, et o t ttme t f s li o a a ei . n e Doc. 3 I W iln h sno s b te aj2 5 p tto f r a dr ce .No ha h s b te a ywrte , lims a t u mitd 2 4 eiin o m s ie td r s e u mi d n itn t o j ci nt t c u tso d ro t ec nsnzto of ss b s ina aj2 5 p tto . b e to o he o r' r e r h o t cin hi u miso s 2 4 eiin Dockets.Justia.com Be us W ila s ha t f ie t c ca e lim s hus a ld o ompl wih t c ts o de , t c t wil y t he our' r r he our l s mmaiyds s t i a to wih u p eu ie a pr p it o d rwil n e t sd y u rl imis h s cin t o t rj dc .An p o rae r e l e tr hi a . Theclr wils nd peii rac oft sm e o a um opi on a t a c ek l e ttone opy hi m r nd ni nd he c ompa ng nyi or r de . & d yo Jn ay a f a u r, 2017. s6 EN TE R:Thi , ChifU ied St t Dit tJ e t aes sdc udge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
