Williams v. Warden, No. 7:2016cv00548 - Document 27 (W.D. Va. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 7/5/2017. (slt)

Download PDF

CL ERTSOFFI U. , ST O URR CE S DI . AT ROANOKE, A V FI LED I TH E UN I N TED STA TES D I STR I CO U R T CT FO R TH E W E STER N D I STR I O F V I G I I CT R N A ROANOKE DI I ON V SI M ARSHALL DEW AYNE W I AM S, ) LLI Pettone ii r, ) ) v. ) ) W ARDEN ) Re po nt s nde . ) JUL 25 2 1 27 J A C. ULI DUD BY: W , CLERK K Ci lAci No.7: c 00548 vi ton 16-vM EM OM NDUM OPI ON NI By: Hon. ihae F.Ur ki M c l bans UniedSt e Dit itJudge t ats src M a s l DeW a W ila ,af de ali aepr e ng pr K ,fl d ape ii f a rhal yne li ms e r nm t oc edi o ie tton or . wrtofha a c puspurua t 28U. C.j2241 Peiine aguest tt fdea Burauof i be s or s nt o S. . tto r r ha he e rl e Prs nsi ho di hi il ga l be us heha ar a s r edhi f de a s e s Thepa tes io s l ng m le ly ca e s le dy e v s e r l entnce . ri sldmo in frs mmayj g n , n t i ma tri rpef rds o i o .Afe rv e n te e to s o u r ud me t a d h s te s i o ip st n tr e iwig h i rc r ,h c u t rn sRepo de tsmoinf rs mmayj d me ta de isPei o e ' e o d t e o r g a t s n n' to o u r u g n nd ne tt n rs i mo inf rsl r j d me t to o l mma y u g n . Peii ne ha be n co c e ofmuli e s pa a ec i e by asa eco ta t tto r s e nvi t d tpl e r t rm s t t ur nd wo dif r ntf r lditi co t.Pe ii rbei ve t tt m os r ce tf r ls nt ncei fe e ede a srct urs ttone le s ha he t e n ede a e e mpos d e b teUntd Sae Ditit u to t W e tr Dit c o Te n s e (-e ne seFe ea y h ie tt s src Co r fr he sen sl t f n e s e Qr n se d r l i t Co l li l a u be a eo ho tec u t oet es ne ei t en n e j d me t : 6 uf' s mlwf l c us f w h o r wr t h e tnc n h me d d u g n :1 9 mo t st b s r e c n e ui et t et ic a g ds ne c s( f1 9y a s i c s n mb r n h o e e v d o s c tv o h md sh r e e tn e o 0 e rq n a e u e CR3 8 - 48G o to t ( le S ae DititCo r f rte No t m Ditito Te sa d - 4 1 - u f he Uri d tt s src u t o h q rhe src f xa n t c entm be 85 2 outoft 86 h J i i DititCou t Roc l Cot y,TX . as l r Che t ud cal src r, kwa l mt ' ' Williams v. Warden Pei o ritr rt t n 't me ni r'c n l dn ta t ec nu cinc e tdt tt ne n ep es t d'o a d , o cu ig h t h o j n to rae wo i a o' Doc. 27 pos i e s nt nc be l i da es Thus Pe ii ne be i ve t s nt nc i pos by t sbl e e e gim ng t . j tt o r le s he e e e m ed he Te w s ee Fe r lCour c d beg n upo c m pl t o o t 1 ye r s nt nce Q n c s num be m s de a t oul i n o e i n f he 09- a e e t ae i r CR3 8 - 486 o to t ( tdS ae DititCo r f rte No tenDitito Te sl. - 4 1 - u f he Uni tt s src u t o h j rh r src f xa p l e c c enum be 85C- outoft 8 h J calDititCo q Roc l Cot y,TX . Pe ii r as r 2 he 6t udi i src ur kwa l mt ' ttone ' Dockets.Justia.com beleve t tt s nt e i i s ha he e enc mpos d by t Te ç he nnes e Fe r lCou ti il ala voi be aus i s e de a r s leg nd d c e t cn nnotbe dee m i whe t c ec i s n e ea m a l begns tr ned n he ons utve e t nc c ly i . Thec u t ee t Peiin rsilgc l ne eaino t ewo dl 1' t eus o l n ' o r rj cs tto e ' l ia itprtto f h r ç d' h e f ç d' o m' ; a i t ej d me ti ce ra t mbg o s F rh r r ,h c le g dj g n fo te n h u g n s la nd ma iu u . u te mo e t e haln e ud me t r m h Te s e Fe r lCour wase e ed i Nove be 201 a t s ntnc f ca entmbe 85Cpne s e de a t nt r n m r 2, nd he e e e or s l r 2 o oft 86 h J c a D i ti tCour o R o kw al Cot t had a r dy bee di c r d o ut he t udi i l s r c tf c l my lea n s ha ge n Augus 11. t ,2005,whie i f de a c t vi t sae' m a t r s r son c rik a e Eve l n e r l usody a he t t s nda o y upe vii e tf t . n . i t ec u tr ae l nd' sme nigç r't ej dg n ce l sae t es n e c i c n e u ie f h o r te td ç 'a a n ç , h u me t lv y tts h e tn e s o s c tv a o ' t Emd sh r e 's n e c s Co e u n l,h j d me th st r nc ns c t t t o t ic a g d' e tn e . nsq e ty te u g n a o u o e ui o he t ve undic r d 1 - ars ntnc fom t Unied St t Diti tCour f t Norhe n Diti tof s ha ge 09 ye e e e r he t aes src t or he t r src Te ,nott dic ge s nt nc fom t sa ec ut xas he s har d e e e r he tt ot ' . Ac r ngl t s ntnc i pos d byt Te s e Fe r lCour wilnotc co di y, he e e e m e he nne s e de a t l omm e e nc untlt 1 ye rs t ncei i he 09- a en e mpos byt Te sFede a Co ti s tsi d.Ther c d c d ed he xa r l ur s aife e or oul no l d ar tona ti off c t fnd i Peii rsf vor a Pe ii ne ' a g e t thei t ea a i l rer a t o i n ttone ' a , nd tto rs r um nt ha s e t ldt d fulj g n i fioo s c r ig y Repo e tsmoi nf rs mma y ni e o ea tud me t s rv lu .Ac o dn l , s nd n ' to o u r t j d me ti g a td a dPeiin rsmoin frsl r u g n i d n e u g n s rn e , n tto e ' to o l mmayj d me t s e id. ENTER: Thi s da ofJ y,201 y ul 7 , w . . ti l 7 éL: y p'' b' ï z ,' ey2 m . .6 ! , . . ' , - ,. v. .- U nie St t td a 2 . (. . -,z%.. .. ' . . . . - i t i tJ e s rc udg . : t .

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.