White v. Duffield Regional Jail, No. 7:2016cv00531 - Document 11 (W.D. Va. 2016)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 12/19/2016. (tvt)

Download PDF

CL 'OF I U. DIXCOU ' ERKS FCE S. S 1 AT ROANOKE, , VA .j . uuo 2E2 1S 2 1 26 I THE UM TED STATES DI N STRI COURT CT FOR TH E W ESTERN DI STRI OF W RGI A CT NI ROANOKE DI SION VI TO BY A LEX AN D ER W H I TE, JUL '. U I % BY: W r C CA SE N O .7: 16CV 00531 Pl ntf , ai i f V. M EM O R AN D UM O PI O N M DUFFI ELD REGI ONAL JM L, By: Gl n E.Conra e d C hi fU nie St e D i t c Judge e t d at s s ri t D e endant f . To y Alx nd rW ht,a Vignaj i imae p o e dn p o . ,fld ti cvlrg t b e a e ie r ii al n t r c e ig r K ie h s i i ih s a to u d r4 U.. j 1 8 ,algng d nilo a s e ild e t alvae so c to bl. cin n e 2 SC. 9 3 le i e a f p ca it o le it tma h r u e ' Upon r viw oft r c d, heco tfndst tt a ton mus be sl a iy dim is e e he e or t ur i ha he c i t lmm rl s s ed. W hie' algai i hi j198 compli a es re: t s le tons n s 3 ant r pas I rq e td a s ca de tgl b c u e (1 a h vgn q p o lms wi my e u se pe il it ray e a s 1 m a i g r b e t h so c a d h ve b e d ng d a y me ia te t n . I n silha i ) t ma h n a e n e i ) n e dc l r ame t m tl. vl ng so c p o lmsa d h v b e l d t b t saf I sae i t e ilrue t ma h r b e n a e e n i o y he tf. t tt s n h lr g l) e book t ts ciltlq aeonl rceved frrlgi o me c pur e ,a ha pe a rays r y e i o ei on r dial pos s nd IG e b e d n e t a. gv l e n e id h t ( mp .2,ECF No.1) W ht s e G dc la d fn n il'rle i ti a to a d to b Co l . i e ks l ia n ia ca' eif n h s cin n é e e me t mo e t p io . (d. v d o rs n' 1 ) ' The c t i r quie t dim is any a ton or cai fl d by a prs our s e r d o s s ci l m ie ioner a i t a ga ns gove m e ale iy orof e i t c tde e mi t a ton o c am i fi o ,malc ous m nt ntt fc r f he our t r nes he c i r l i s rvol us ii , o fist saeacam o whihrle ma beg a td.28U.. j1 5 b ( ) A &rv lu ' r al o tt li n c eif y rn e SC. 91 A( )1. l i oo s' f c am i onet tGlc a a gua ebasset ri lw o i f t' Net kev.W iln ,490 U. li s ha ta ks n r bl i ihe n a r n ac . ' iz li ms S. White v. Duffield Regional Jail Doc. 11 31 , 2 , 2 ( 9 9 (nep ei llvoo s'nf r rv rino 28U. C. 1 5 d ) 9 3 5 3 7 1 8 ) itrr t ii l u 'i o me e so f ng f S. j 91 ( ). Sec i 1 3 pe m is a a i ve pa t t fl a c vi a ton a ns a pe s n f ac i ns ton 98 r t n ggr e d r y o i e i l c i gai t r o or to tke t rc orofsat lw t tvi a e hi c tm to lrght.Se Coo rv.She han,735 a n mde ol t e a ha olt d s onsi i na i s e pe e F. 153,158 (t Ci.201 ) Theonl e iy t tW hienn sa adef ntt hi j 1 3d 4h r 3 . y ntt ha t me s enda o s 983 Dockets.Justia.com .. camsi tej i is l.Th ji, o ve, sn taE e s n's b e tt s i u d rj 1 8 .M c y li s h altef e alh we r i o s r o ' u j c o ut n e 9 3 co p v.Ch sp a e Co r Ce tr 7 8 F.S p .8 0.8 3 9 ( D.Va 1 9 )( dngj i i me e a e k r. n e, 8 u p 9 , 9 - 4 E. . 9 2 fn i al mmt fo s i a dn tap ro f r r o e o j 1 8 ) Se as As r f v.q l 5 6U. 6 2 6 6 r m ut n o es n o pu p s s f 9 3 . e lo hco t Iba, 5 S. 6 , 7 ( 0 9 ( ( p an ifmu tp e dt a e c Go en n - f a d fn a t t r u ht eo fca' 2 0 ) :A1 litf s la h t a h v r me tot l ee d n , h o g h fiils 1 ki own i vi a tons ha vi ae t Consiuin.). Bec us ' hie fis t sae f t ndi dual ci , s oltd he tt to ' a e W t al o tt acs rg r n a to s t ta y pa t ua j i o lca u d ro k i voain o l s c nsi in l e adig cin ha n ri lr al fiil n eto n ilt f a o tmt a c o i o rg t, ht' c mp an prs n sn lg l rf cu l a i f racam a to beu e j1 8 . ih s W ies o lit e e t o e a o a ta b ss o li cina l nd r 9 3 Fo t e sae ra o t e c t' wils r h ttd e s n, h out l ummaiy ds s ti a to wi u p eu ie rl imis h s cin t t rj dc , ho l e hi pls a t oj 1 5 b () a fi lu . A na p o raeorderwilent rt sday t u n t 91 A()1 , s rvoo s1 r p r p it . The Clr i die t d t s nd c es of t s me or ndum o ni a a c pa ng ek s rce o e opi hi m a pi on nd c om nyi or rt pli tf . de o a n if E E T l Na ooee e,06 NT R: us h y r cmbr21. Chif nie St t sDititJ e t d a e src udge 1 I a y e e t W ht' c re talg to sd n tsaea yc n ttt na cam ato a l t e 51 3 n n v n, i s urn l ain o o tt n o siui l li cin be mdr 98 e e o agans a i t nyone. He doe notsae fct s ng a s rousmedi lnee f rteame ori c tng a hi mor s tt a s howi ei ca d o r t nt ndiai nyt ng e ta hsdsge me twi tej i' me ia safa o t eh ras e ilde i n c sayo a p o raetet n h n i ia re n t h als dc l tf b u wh te p ca it s e esr r p rp it rame t h t alvaehsalge so c df ute . Se Esel v Ga l,4 U. 9 ,1 2 (9 6 (odn ta o y a o le it i l d tma h isc lis e tle . mbe 29 S. 7 0 1 7 ) h lig h t nl e p io ot a' d l eae idifrn et imaessro sme ia ned voae teEihhAme d n) Th rsn fkils ei rt n fee c o n t' eiu dc l e s ilts h g t b n me t. e deieaeidfee e sa d r isno stsid b .,.meeds ge me tc n enn tqu sin o me c l l rt n ifrnc tn ad t t aife y b i r ia re n o cr ig lleto s f dia j d me t' Geman v S e rn 5 F. p' 3 2 3 5(t Ci. 01 )(n u ls e )(u t Rusel Sh fe, u g n,' r i - h ai, 31 Ap x 9 , 9 4h r 2 3 u p bih d q oi ' . ng s lv. efr 5 8F.d31 , 9(t Ci.1 759 S eas Bo i v Go wi 5 1F.d4 , (t Ci.1 7 )(idn ta i 2 2 8 31 4h r 9 2. e lo wrnc . d n, 5 2 4 48 4h r 9 7 tn ig h t n c tt ina cam r ga di prs me c c r ,tt e s nta ts i o ofme c nec st a notsmpl t t onsiuto l li e r ng ion dial a e the s e il e t s ne dial esiy nd i y ha whihma b c n iee meeyd srbe'. c y e o sd rd rl eia l' ) 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.