Hawkins v. Salem Police Department, No. 7:2016cv00507 - Document 26 (W.D. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 7/31/2017. (slt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CL SOFFI ERK' C E U' DI A RoA S,, V . OOUR) T FI Noc :T LED A I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FOR TH E W ESTERN DI STRI OF W RGI A CT NI R O AN O K E DI I O N V SI CLARENCE EDW ARD HAW KI NS, Pli if antf, ) ) ) ) ) SALEM POLI DEPARTM ENT,e aI, CE t .) De e f ndant. s ) AL p1 2 1 C 27 J A C QUD E ULI B Y: % CL RK E D W . R Ci lA c i n N o.7: c 00507 vi t o 16- vM E M O M N D U M O PI I N N O By: H on. i hae F.U r M c l bans ki ChifUnied St e Dit itJudge e t at s s rc Clr nceEdwa d Ha ns aVigi ai t pr ee ng pr K , m me e tlscvi ae r wki , r ni nma e oc di o co nc d li i l rg t a to pls n t 4 U. C. 1 3 a t ermanngd fn a t aeS lm Poie ih s cin t ua t o 2 S. j 98 , nd h e ii ee d n s r ae lc r De me a Age Fr e. On Jme 15, 7,Sa e Polc De rme fl d am o i t pm nt nd nt y t 201 lm i e pa t nt ie ton o dim is On t ne da t Clr is d aNotc advii Pli ift tamoton t dim is s s. he xt y, he e k s ue i e, sng antf ha i o s s wasfl d a t theha t t oneda fom t No i t fl ar s ie nd ha d wen yys r he tce o ie e pons . TheNotc f t r e ie arhe ad s d: vi e l Pl ntf does not r pond ... t Co twil a s e t t Pl i if ha l t f ai if es , he ur l s um ha antf s os i e e ti t c e,a ort tPl i ifagr e wih wha t De e nt r s n he as nd/ ha antf e s t t he f ndantsa e .... tts I Pli ifwihest c i wih t c s ,i i nec s a y t tPli ifr s f antf s o ontnue t he a e t s e s r ha a ntf e pond i n a appr it f s on .... Howe r i Pl i if does not 5l s n opra e a hi ve . f antf e ome r pons es e wihi t t nt o ( )da pe i t Cour m a dim is t c s f f iur t n he we y- ne 21 y rods he t y s s he a e or a l e t pr o osecut e. Noie( no 2 )(rgn l mp a i) tc ECF . 5 o ila e h ss. Pli ifdi no r s antf d t e pond t t N o i o t m oto t dimis t Notcewasnot o he tce r he i n o s s , he i r t r t t c tasundei r bl a Pli tf e u ned o he our lve a e, nd a n ifhasnotwrte t t c rtsnc M a c itn o he ou i e r h Hawkins v. Salem Police Department 2017. Plr ua t t N o i e er d on J 1 201 t com'Gndst tPl ntf ha f ie t zs nt o he tce nt e une 6, 7, he t ha ai if s al d o Doc. 26 p osc t t i c s .Ac o dn l t ea n e c mp an i ds s e wi o t eu ie r e u e hs a e c r igy,h me d d o lit s imis d t u prj d c h ptrua t Fe R.Ci P. ( duet Pl ntf fiur t pr ec e, alpe ngmoi ls nt o d. v. 41b) o ai ips al e o os ut and l ndi tons aed n e wi u p eudc a mo t S eLikv. a a hR. Co.3 0U. 6 6 6 031 r e id t t rj ie s o . e r W b s R. , 7 S. 2 , 3 ho l Dockets.Justia.com ( 9 2 (( a t o i o ac u tods s s s o t f rlc o p o e u inh sg n r lybe n 1 6)รง The u h rt f o r t imis ua p n e o a k f r s c to a e e al e y c i r d a Snhe e powe , ...ne s miy vese i c t t ma onsde e n i r nt r' ce s l t d n ours o naget i own a f iss a her far o s t a he teo d ry a de p dt d s osto o c s s' o c ive h r el n x e i' ip iin f a e . ). ENTER: hs31 dyo Jl, 0 7 Ti a fuy 2 1. # .# 'r v # . z2. .. 7*' ' '' & -, . 4- Chi fUnie Stt Di 'tJ e t d aes c udge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
