Hammer v. Hutcheson, No. 7:2016cv00499 - Document 4 (W.D. Va. 2016)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 11/3/2016. (tvt)

Download PDF

CLERK' OF CEU.S. SX COURT : FI DI AT DANVI LE,VA L FI LED d2V 23 2 1 22 I TH E U N I N TED STATES D I STR I C O UR T CT FOR THE W ESTERN DISTRI OF VI NI CT RGI A R O AN O K E DI I O N V SI GREGORY LEON H AM M ER, Pe ii r tt one , J U B(E SYLK KDgD c LC OS . Lp I E A PLTY CLERK J Ci lA c i n N o.7: c 00499 vi t o 16- v- M E M O R AN D UM O PI O N M SH ER I BR YA N H U TC H E SO N , FF R es pondent . By: H on. ks n L.Ki e Jac o sr Se or U ni e St esD i t i tJudge ni t d at src Gr r Le Hn me , Vigi apr ti lde ane pr ee ngpr K , ied apeii n f ego y on m r a r ni era t i e oc di o fl tto or awrtofha asc pus Peii rc i be or . ttone ompl nst tt Roc ng m Comt Cic tCour wilnot ai ha he ki hn t y r ui t l r las Peii ro bo a trhi a r s f a lgedl pos es i a c ee e ttone n nd fe s re t or le y s sng once l dw e pon ae a unlwf ly a be or t tc tc nd t apr ton r voc to he rng.The sae cr ui c t a ul nd f e ha our o uc s oba i e ai n a i t t ic t our de ed t r que tf ba l a Pe ii r s a a r m ai pe ng a t Cour ofAppe l of ni he e s or i, nd ttone ' ppe l e ns ndi t he t as V i gi a. r ni A f r lc t ilonl i r i t a sa e co ts de e m i ton ofbai w he t ede a our w l y nquie n o t t ur ' t r na i l n he de e mi ton i abir y o dic i i t r o r s t i t de a ofcom s oraf rti . t r na i s r tar r s rm na o y r e uls n he ni l t el ai ral M atinv. d n 3 6F.d7 8 71 - 1(t Ci.1 6 ) W a se v. ik ro 2 3F. u p sra He ma , 2 2 0 , 0 1 8h r 9 4 ; n lv W l es n, 6 S p . 5 , 6 5 ( . Va 1 6 ) ç- p r o eo rq iigab n i t a s r t ep e e eo te 4 5 - 7 W D. . 9 7 .Gl u p s f e urn o d s o su e h r snc f h -he d fnd n a t etil I t etilu g r a o a l beive t a r g r ls o t en u ts the ee a t t h ra. f h ra j d e e s n by le s h t e ad e s f h mo n e t . a c s dwi bel i l t bep e e ta tilh ma d nyb i c mp eey Alo atilud e c u e l l key o rs n tra, e y e al o ltl. s , ra j g l nl mus de bai i hef l t r l s oft a c edwile nge t s ey o t co ml t ' t ny l f ees he eea e he c us l nda r he af t f he m miy. ' Hammer v. Hutcheson Doc. 4 W a lv s p a a 5 (nena ctto so te ) nse , u r , t 7 i tr l iain mitd . Pe ii r f l t e t bls t tt de a o bai w asa bir r o di c i i t r o ttone ais o s a ih ha he ni l f l r t a y r s rm na o y r r s t d i t de a ofco eloraf i ti l Furhe mor ,a e e r or na y cr um sa es e ule n he ni l uns a r ra . t r e bs nt xta di r ic t nc , f de a c t m us no i e f r wih pe ng s a e c i i lpr e ngs Se ee. , ot ce v. e r l our s t t nt r e e t ndi t t rm na oc edi . e :. Y m r Dockets.Justia.com Hars 4 U. 3 4 ( 9 ) Hak a e v W a ly 1 2U. 1 8 1 9 7 ( 8 8 ; yo v ri, 01 S. 7, 4 1 71 ; r r d r . de , 7 S. 4 , 6 - 0 1 9 ) Ta lr . Tano ,8 U. 3 6 3 0( 8 3 .F d rldsrc c u t s uda ti fo c n ttto a itr 3 S. 6 , 7 1 7 ) e ea itit o rs ho l bsan r m o siuin l c aln e t sae u iil r c e i s rg r ls o acam' me is i t ef d rlcamsc u d h l g s o tt j d ca p o e dng , e a de s f li s rt, f h e ea li o l e b p e e tdi t eo ongsae u iil r c e ig Cie Bleo Ch rot.nc v e r sn e n h ng i tt j dca p o e dn . n ma u f alte I . . Gic rs, 8 F.d4 , 2 5 ( t Ci.1 8 ) Clal Peiin rma p e e thscamst sae lh it 8 7 2 9 5 - 3 4h r 9 9 . e ry, tto e y rs n i li o tt c ut vi t c r nta ot ' a he ur e ppea w ih t Cour o A ppea s ofV i gi a. See Bonne v.Ci c tCo t s l t he tf l r ni r r ui ur o S . ui, 2 F.d 1 1 1 3 (t Ci. 9 5 ( b n )(co g e sa dt fd r l o rs f tLo s 5 6 2 33 , 3 6 8h r 1 7 ) 0 a c t n r s n he e e a c u t t ha c itnty r ogni d t tf r lco t s dpe mi sa ec t t ty sa ec e ,a ve ons se l ec ze ha ede a urs houl r t t t ours o r t t as s nd t a, eec n tt to l su saie saec u tud e aef l c mp tn t h ndet m h twh r o siuina is e rs , tt o r j g s r ' l o ee t o a l he uy s b e t oS prmeCo r rv e ' .M o e v r t An iljmcinAc, 8U. C. 2 3 u jc t u e u t e iw.) ro e,he t-nt to t 2 S. j 28 , ' e p e syp o iisac u t r m e j ii gsaeci n l r c e i s a llc u id cint x r sl r hbt o r fo n on n tt rmi a p o e dng , nd a kj rs ito o gr ntma m usr le agans sa eofi a sorsa eag nc e . Gure v.Supe i Cour o a nda ei f i t tt fcil tt e is lv ror tf M e l n u :Cny.41 F.d 5 6 5 7( t Ci.1 6 ) cde b r t , 1 2 8 , 8 4h r 9 9 . - Ac o dngy t pei o i ds se wi o t rj dc , ru n t Rue 1b a d4o c r i l,he t in s imis d t u p eu ie pu s a t o ls () n f t h t Rul Goveni j2254Ca e , ca eipli y a a sfom t peii t tPeiine i he es r ng s s be us t anl ppe r r he tton ha tto r s note il d t r le .Bas dupon my fnd ngt tPe ii rhasnotm a t r uiie ntte o e if e i i ha ttone de he eq st s tntals wi ofade a ofac nsiutona rghtasr uie by28U. C.j22534) a ubsa i ho ng nil o tt i l i eq rd S. c, c rii t ofappe a lt ' de e e tfcae albiiy s nid. ENTER :Thi s da ofNove r 201 y mbe , 6. ! . $p . > -Se rUnie St t sDititJ e ' ni t d a e src udg 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.