Thompson v. Ratledge et al, No. 7:2016cv00493 - Document 4 (W.D. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 2/24/2017. (slt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
cu ' o6 l u s.ol cour ee s gcE sm . AT RoAxou ,m Fl uEo I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI CT RGI A NI ROANOKE DI SI VI ON FEB 2ù 2 1 27 JU L GL EY ERK BY: ' ' CL ERK ELRODA SHAVAYA TH OM PSON, Pl ntff ai i , V. C .R ATLE DG E ,e al, t . D efendant s. C i lA c i N o.7: 6- vvi t on 1 c 0049 3 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) M EM O M ND U M O PI O N NI B y: H on.M i chae F.Urbans l ki Unied St e D i t i tJudge t at s s r c Eloda Sha yaThomps pr e ng pr K ,fl d ape ii f awrtofha asco us r va on, oc edi o ie tton or i be p . purua t 28U. C.j2241 c ani a hi consne nti t sgr gai uni a t s nt o S. , ompli ng bout s me n he e e ton t t he UntdS ae Pe ie tayi Le Co ny, r ii (US Le ' .Th mp o ddn t a afln ie tts ntnir n e u t Vigna I P e' o s n i o p y iig I ) f ordoc ntar ques t pr e k f mapa rs ee ume e t o oc ed q or uoei. On Ocobe 28,201 t c tc tue t peii asa cvi rg sc t r 6, he our onsr d he tton i l i ht ompl i pur ua ant s nt t Bie sv Si Un n wnNn dAc n so Fe Bu e uo Na c tc , 0 U. 38 ( 9 ) a d o vn . x k o me e t f d. ra f rois 4 3 S. 8 1 71, n o d r dhm t tl fna ca d t i a c r a c wih2 U. C. 1 1 .Th c u t u te r e e i o ie i n il aa n c o d n e t 8 S. j 9 5 e o r frh r or e hi t m ant i a a ur t ma lngadd e sa t taf iur t c der d m o i an n cc ae ii r s nd ha a l e o ompl wih et rof y t ihe t e ec n i o swo l rs t nds sa o t c mplitwi o t rj d c . h s o dt n u d euli imis l f he o an t u p eu ie i h On Nove r21 201 t c t e e ve al te fom Tho ps n,s yi hewilbe mbe , 6, he our r c i d e tr r m o a ng l ta f red fom USP Le s a hewoul pr dea upda e m alng add es wihi t ee r ns e r r e oon nd d ovi n t d ii r s t n hr we .Thr em ont ha pa s t cour' prorOr rwa no r m r d t t co ta eks e hs ve s ed, he ts i de s t e ne o he ur s t lve a e a Tho ps ha net rupda e hi maii a e sno fl d t r que t d mdei r bl , nd m on s ihe t d s lng ddr s r ie he e s e Thompson v. Ratledge et al fna ca d t .Ac o dngy tec u t imis stec mp an wih u p eu ief rf i n t i n il aa c r i l ,h o r d s se h o lit t o t rj d c o al g o i Doc. 4 c pl w ih t cour ' Or ra f f lng t pr e ut . See Bala d v.Ca l on,882 F. 93, om y t he ts de nd or aii o os c e lr rs 2d 96( h Ci.1 9)(ttngor y ltga smus r pec coutor r a dimis i a 4t r 98 sai o - ii nt t es t t' des nd s sal s n q a o it s nci f non-ompla e ;Donnelyv. ohnsM a leSae Com.677F. ppr prae a ton or c inc ) l J - nvil ls , 2d 3 9, 4041(d Ci.1 8 )(e o nii gadsrc c u t y s as o t d s s a a to 3 3 - 3 r 9 2 rc g zn itit o r ma u p n e imis n cin Dockets.Justia.com pmsua t Fed. Ci P. ( ) Thomps ma rfl t cai i ane a s pa àea ton nt o R. v. 41b). on y eie he l ms n w nd e r t ci o ehe i pr pa dt c pl wih t not d c töhs nc s e ze o om y t he e ondii . EN TER : Thi s R k dyfera,07 l aoFbur 21. y ' , + f-. ;' : . 2r. . . 2 r r# : . Unie St t Diti tJ t d aes jrc udge 2 . , -t 2 Z ,. '' - . . .' -
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
