Williams v. Trent et al, No. 7:2016cv00480 - Document 50 (W.D. Va. 2017)
Court Description: ORDER denying 28 Motion to Dismiss ; granting in part and denying in part 32 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; the remaining defendants shall file a motion for summary judgment, supported by affidavit(s), within 30 days (Opinion & Order mailed to Pro Se Party)Signed by Judge Norman K. Moon on 9/19/2017. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Williams v. Trent et al Doc. 50 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ROANOKE DIVISION RASHAND WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, v. TRENT, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 7:16cv00480 ORDER By: Norman K. Moon United States District Judge In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this day, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1) The motion to dismiss of defendants Hairston and Bramblett-Robinson (Docket No. 28) is DENIED. 2) The motion to dismiss of defendants Hartman, Trent, and Cox (Docket No. 32) is GRANTED in part as to Williams’ claims against defendants Trent and Cox and DENIED in part as to Williams’ claim against defendant Hartman. 3) Pursuant to Standing Order 2013-6, the remaining defendants shall FILE a motion for summary judgment, supported by affidavit(s), within thirty days. 4) The Clerk shall send copies of this order and the accompanying memorandum opinion to the parties. 19th ENTER: This ____ day of September, 2017. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
