Meyers v. Mills, No. 7:2016cv00360 - Document 15 (W.D. Va. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 10/13/2016. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
r FRK' OF CE U. DIT.COUA ; S FI S. B AT ROANOKE, VA FI LED I TH E UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF W RGI A CT NI ROAN OK E DI SI VI ON ANTH ONY M EYERS, Pl ntf , ai if 22T 12 2 1 26 J A . ULI B: t Y C i lA c i N o.7: c 00360 vi t on 16- v- M EM O RANDUM O PI O N M By: G l n E .Conr e ad Chi f Unie St t Dit i tJudge e t d a es sr c D R .M ILLS, De e a t) f nd nts. Ant ny M e s pr e ng pr K, ie acvlrg t c mpan, u s a t o4 U. C. 1 8 , ho yer , oc edi o fld ii ih s o li tp ru n t 2 S. j 9 3 . whiei a c r t d. By o de e e e J y 29, l nc r e a e r r nt r d ul 2016, hecour a s pl i ift ta f ilr t updae a t t dvied antf ha alze o t m alng add e swilr s ti dim is oft saci n. ii r s l e ul n s s al hi to Thec tsm alng da e Se e r16, 6, o pl i ifa t a es hepr de wih hi our' ii t d pt mbe 201 t antf t he ddr s ovi d t s compl ntha be n r mr d asunde i r bl A ha ai s e e ne lve a e. ndwrte me s geon t e opei c es itn s a he nvel ndiat : l f ed- Sgt P. a r ' s d on t sr t nedm a lng,t c tfndst tM eye sha et r t us Re . Fl ne y. 'Ba e hi eur ii he our ha r s ihe )r us t a e hi ma lorha f ie t pr vi t co twih acure a e s The e o e t sca e ef ed o cc pt s i s a ld o o de he ur t r nt ddr s . r f r , hi s s al eDI S h l b SMI SED wih u p eu ie S eBalr v Calo 8 2F.d9 , 6( t Ci. 98 )(ttn t o t rj d c . e lad . rs n, 8 2 3 9 4h r 1 9 saig p o. ltg nsa es b e tt tmer q ie n sa rs c f rc u t r e sa dds sa wih u r K iia t r u j c o i e urme t nd epe t o o r o d r n imis l t o t p eu iei a a pr p it sn to f rn n c mp in e; r lvv. o nsM a v l S lsCo , 7 rj d c s n p o rae a cin o o - o la c ) Domel J h - n il ae p.6 7 e F.d3 9 3 0 41( dCi. 9 2 (e o nzn ad src c u t y s as o t ds s a a to p ru n 2 3 , 4 - 3 r 1 8 ) r c g iig itit o r ma u p ne imis n cin u s a t t F d R. v. 41b ) o e . Ci P. ( ). TheClr i die t d t s nd c esoft sM e a um Opi on a t ac ompa ngOr r ek s r c e o e opi hi mor nd ni nd he c nyi de t t pm i . o he es Meyers v. Mills Doc. 15 ENTER:Thi / M da ofocobe , 2016. sZ y t r . Chi f e Dockets.Justia.com 'e St t sD it i tJ ge t d a e s rc ud , RK .
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
