Entsminger v. Griffith, No. 7:2016cv00352 - Document 2 (W.D. Va. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 8/16/2016. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CV RK' OFFI u.S. sm colr S GE Dl l A DANVI E. T LL VA FI LED ALs 15 2 1 ' 26 I TI E UNI N I TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF W RGI A CT NI RO ANOK E DI SI W ON R ON AI, D. D ENTSM I GER,. . N J , R Pettoner, ii V. JUDGE H I W GRI TH, LM FFI R e pondent s . JUL BY: D LEM G RK . RP C K Ci lAc i N o.7: 6- v- 35 vi t on 1 c 00 2 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) M EM O R AN DU M O PI O N NI By: Hon.Jac o L.K ie ks n sr Se or U nie St e Di t c Judge ni t d at s s ri t Rona dD . s i r J . aVigi ai t pr e di pr m , ie apeii n f ra wrt l Entm nge , r, r ni nma e oc e ng o fld tto o i ofha a copuspurua t Z8' S. j2 .Peii rco ansa tt Reponde , be s r s nt o U. C. 241 ttone mpli bou he s nta saec u tu e s ne i h m t sx- nhs i rs n n f rf ingt p yc l s p o t tt o r j dg , e tnchg i o i mo t 'mp io me t o al o a hi u p r. i d W h t rp o e dngva28U. C.j2 41o j2 3 , h be speiin ri u t x a s a alb e ehe r c e i i S. 2 r 2 4 a a a t o e n s e h u t v ia l t sa ec t e edisbe o es e ngf r lha asr if Se e. ,Br n v. h J ca t t our r m e f r e ki ede a be ele . e. c. ade 30t udi il Cic tCo r, 0U. 48 , 9 - ( 9 3 ; o r v. Yo n , 5F.d4 7 4 2 4 ( dCi. rui u t41 S. 4 4 0 91 1 7 ) M o e De u g 51 2 3 , 4 - 3 3 r 1 7 ) Peiine h sn v rp s dha e sr l f asaec u t.Co e ue t Pei o e h s 9 5 . t o r a e e urue b a ei vi tt o rs ns q nl tt n r a t e y, i sa ecou'r m e esa ia et hi ,no e r or na y cicl sa ese s i t sc e a l tt t t e di va lbl o m xta di r r tm t nc xit n hi as , nd ds s t ep tto wi o t rj d c p ru n t Ruls1b a d4o t Ru e Go enng imis h eiin t u p eu ie u s a t o e ( ) n f he ls v r i h Se to 2 5 Ca e .S eLe nadv Ha n 8 4F.d8 8 8 3( t Ci.1 8 )( dn cin 2 4 s s e o r . mmo d, 0 2 3 , 4 4h r 9 6 sn ig ha a peii ne sc le i cvi co i me f notpayi c l s be s tto r ha lngng i l nfne nt or ng hid uppo tmus srte us r t s xha t saec u t e de b f r fln fd r l a a p tto ) Ba e u n myfndn t a Peiin r tt o r r me is e o e iig e e a h be s eiin . s d po i ig h t tto e h sn t d terq iiesà tnilho n o ad na o ac nttto a rg ta zq ie b a o ma e h e ust u sa ta s wig f e il f o si in lih s e urd y u Entsminger v. Griffith Doc. 2 28U. C. 2 5 ()a S a kv. c n e, 2 U. 47 , 4 ( 0 ) ac ri aeo S. j 2 3 c nd lc M Da il 5 9 S. 3 48 20 0 , e t t f fc a ppea abiiy i de e l lt s ni d. k t 6 s r u: hs 1' da ofaugus 201 xr T ipf y s z . . . r * ' S ni r Unie St t s D i ti tJ ge o t d a e s rc ud Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
