Williams v. Warden, No. 7:2016cv00299 - Document 6 (W.D. Va. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 7/19/2016. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
' V I TH E UN I N TED STA TES D I STRI T C O UR T C FO R TH E W E STER N D I STR I O F V I G I I CT R N A ROANOKE DI I ON V SI M ARSHALL DEW AYNE W I AM S, ) LLI Pl ntf, ai if ) ) v. ) ) W ARDEN, ) De e f ndant . ) . CLERK' OFFI U. . ST. S CE : DI COURT A7n> NoKE, VA FI LED J 1S 2 1 UL 26 J ULI BY; A ' U , L ru e E ERK C i lA c i N o.7: 6- v- 299 vi t on 1 c 00 M EM O M N DU M O PI O N NI By: H o M i hae F.U r n. c l bans ki U ni e St e D i t i tJudge t d at s s r c M a s lDeW a W ila sfl d adocl e tte t n r Pa ol Applc to M oton rhal yne lim ie lm nt il d, û e: r e l ia i n, i t Enl r Aut rt oft Fe r PublcDef nde Of t Pr e Pe ii ne ' Co tt i l o a ge ho iy he de al i e r fce o otct tto rs nsiutona Ri sasRe r d by La ' The c tco ii ly fld t r que t a s W ila t tt ght quie w.' our nd tonal ie he e s, dvied li ms ha he c tc t e t rqueta apeii f awrto ha a c our onsnld he e s s tton or i f be s omuspurua t 28U. C.j2241 s nt o S. , a dg a tdW il mst eo p rt t t o j c t t tc nsr cin.Pr sn l b f r t ec u ts n rn e li h p o t y o b e t o ha o tu to e e ty eo e h o r i a mi P an ifso j ci na dmoinf ra e tnso o tmef r h Ofieo t P bl De e e t litf be to n to o n xe in f i o t e fc f he u i fnd r o c e e a a a a e a i tga e W iln s c a m s nt r n ppe r nc nd nves i t li m ' l i . Asac nsq n eo W il ms o j cin t c u t ln t ra t mo int a p it o e ue c f li ' be to ,he o r wil o te t he to o p o n a t Fe r PublcDefnde aspurua t 28U. C.j22 buta amoi t a ntc e he deal i e r s nt o S. 41 s ton o ppoi ouns l i t sc vi c s . 1 W iln s m o i n t a ntt Fe r lPublcDe e ri de e a n hi i l a e lim ' to o ppoi he de a i f nde s ni d s W iln s no l rhasa c tm tonalrghtt c m s l See Pe vl ni v.Fi e 481U . li m onge ons i i i o ot e . nns va a nl y, S. 5 , 5 (98 )(Th rg t oa p itdc u s le tn t t etrta pe l frg t a dn 51 5 5 1 7 & e i h t p on e o n e xe ds o h is p a o ih , n o 1 f rh n' c.1 U. C. 3 0 A() W i ims moin fra e tn i no t i d nida u te ); f 8 S. j 0 6 a . l a ' to o n x e so f i s e e s l me Williams v. Warden m oot. Doc. 6 ENTER:T i l 9 hs dyo Jl, 0 6 a fuy 2 1. . / / : J /. &-: . > /Unie Stt DititJ td aes src uàge 1Alhough W ilamsi hous d wihi t sditit hewa no s nt e byt sc t t li s e t n hi src, s t e enc d hi our. Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
