Muhammad v. Taylor et al, No. 7:2016cv00283 - Document 2 (W.D. Va. 2016)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 6/21/2016. (tvt)

Download PDF
CLERK: OF CEu. Dl couR' FI s. sm r ATDANVILE,v L A I T H E U NI N TED STA TES DI STR I C O U R T CT x., ë . FO R TH E W ESTERN DI STRICT O F V I G I I R N A R O AN O K E DI I O N V SI J 2 12 1 UN 26 ' . 'vnt . uotu cl .a wc ak' nRx cv Atn o7 6v ùvstav-su J il co x.: -- c p ts i i 1 c$ c - M A LC O LM M U H A M M A D , Pl i i f a nt f , M EM O R AN D UM O PI O N M Y . YL O R,etaI, TA . De e nt . f nda s By: H o Jac on L.K i e n. ks sr se orUnie St esDit i tJudge ni t d at src . M alol M tha a a Vigi a i t pr e ngpr K ,fl d a c c m l mm d, r ni nma e oce di o ie ompl i pur ua t ant s nt o 4 U. C. 1 3a s b te o l ap ril y n o fe f racv l ci n Co s q nl I 2 S. j 98 nd u mi d n y a t pa me t f e s o ii a to . n e ue ty, t a consnl t pa ta pa e ass e ng l vet p oc edwihoutpr ym e oft f e.Upo t e he ril ym nt e ki ea o r e t epa nt he e n r viw ofco tr cor ,i a a sPli ifhashad a las t e non- be cvi a tonsor e e ur e ds t ppe r antf t e t hr e ha as i l c i a al pr vi usy dim is d asfi ous a m ai i us orf f lngt sa ea cai be o eilng ppe s e o l s s e rvol , s lc o , or aii b tt l m f r i t sa ton.SeeMuha dv. e e ntFlmi ,No.1 6991 si o a 3(t Ci. c.7, hi ci mma Liutna e nz 5- , lp p. t 4h r De 2 5 (fi n d s sa o c mpan pls a t o2 U. C. 1 1 (); t a dv. O 01 ) afnnig imis l f o li t t u n t 8 S. j 9 5 g) M l mma C/ r h S t , . :3 c - 05 , l o . t1( . Va M a . 4, 1 )(imis dwi p eu ief r mih No 7 1 -v 0 78 si p a W D. . r 1 20 4 d s se t rj d c o p h fii t saeacam) afd No. 4 7 5 , l o a 2( t Ci. v 1 , 01 ) M u n dv. al o tt li , f , 1 - 0 2 si p. t 4h rNo . 8 2 4 ; h mma ng p. Ulp, 1 1 c - 0 5 , l o . t1( D. . r 1 , 01 )( imis dwihp eu iefr e No. :4-v 0 0 5 si p a E. Va Ap . 0 2 4 d s se t rj dc o p f iigt saeacam) a fd No. 4 6 1 si o a 2 (t Ci. g 2 , 01 ) M t a dv. aln o tt li , f' , 1 - 6 2, l p. t 4 h r Au . 2 2 4 ; l mma p h Clr e No 7:4 c 0 4 4 si o a 1( . Va Oc. , 1 )(imis da fi lu ) s e ak , . 1 -v- 0 2 , l p. t W D. . t20 20 4 d s se s rvoo s; e p as M c a v. t dS ae , 6 F.d3 , 9 ( t Ci. 0 9 ( imis l wih u p eu ief r lo Le n Uni tts 5 6 3 91 3 9 4h r 2 0 ) d s sas to t rj dc o e fioo s e ss o l n tb e e tdfo 2 U.. j1 5 g ) rv lu n s h u d o e x mp e r m 8 SC. 91 ( ). Muhammad v. Taylor et al Doc. 2 A fe r vi ng Pl i t f ss i sons i t s c vi a ton, ti c e rt tPl i ifdoe no tr e ewi a n if ubm s i n hi i l c i i s l a ha a ntf s t alege a f c si c tng t the i c r nty t de a i m i ntt e tofa s rous phys c l ny a t ndi a i ha s ur e l m r ny m ne hr a ny e i i al ij r wi nteme nn o 28U. C. 1 5 g .Ac o dngy Ids s t a to wi o t nu y t h a ig f hi S. j 91 ( ) c r i l, imis he cin t u h Dockets.Justia.com p eudc f rP an ifsfiu et pa tesln fea tetmeo fln t c mpli t S e e:, rj ie o litf alr o y h i g e t h i f ig he o an . e . .. Du r ev Pame , 4F.d 1 4, 23 ( 1hCi. 0 2 . p e . l r 28 3 23 1 7 1 t r 2 0 ) E E Ti ; J xT R: hs' * dyo Jn,06 a fu e2 1. f i orU nie St t sD i t i tJ e t d a e s rc udg

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.