Hay v. SWVRJA-Duffield et al, No. 7:2016cv00276 - Document 8 (W.D. Va. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 7/14/2016. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CL ERKSOFFI U. DI D. CE S. SX I 1 X $ C0.'O KE, . .1 % ' X VA '' b F'Ir !.. .fl I THE UM TED STATES DI N STRI CO URT CT FOR TI E W ESTERN DI I STRI OF VI NI CT RGI A R O A N O K E D I SI N W O SH m ON LOYAL H AY, Pl i if a ntf , Y. SW R JA - U FFI D ELD ,e aI t , Dee n t) fnda ts. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUL 1j 2 5 2 J Lï% . . %L z U iG : ' L C 5Y: ' C ' C i lA c i N o.7: 6- vvi ton 1 : 00276 M EM O R AN D UM O PI I N N O By: G l n E.C onrad e C hi fU ni e St t sD i t i tJudge e td a e src Shn nnon Loya Ha pr ee ng pr K , e a cvi rght c pli ,ptr ua t 42 l y, oc di o fld i l i s om a nt zs nt o U. C. 1 8 .Byo d re tr dJme2 , 01 ,h c u t ie tdplitf os mi wihn20 S. j 9 3 r e nee t 3 2 6 t e o r dr ce an ift ub t ti da 9om t dae oft Or rt sgne c e t wihhol ng off sf r i or rt ys he t he de he i d ons nt o t di ee o m n de o c omplt t a i to t pr ee i f m apa rs On J y 8, e e he pplcai n o oc d n or upe i. ul 2016,heco ii nal fld t ndto ly e o de wa r ttned a t lve a ewih no f wa di a es gi n. ai ifw a advie i r r s et r s mdei r bl t or r ng ddr s ve Pl ntf s s d n t frtc tona l fl d or rda e J 1 2016, ha i i hi r ponsbiiyt i or t he s ondii ly ie de t d une 3, t t t s s es i lt o nf m he c t nm ii i our i tng mmedit l upon t r l a eorta f rwih a ne a es .Pli ifwas a ey he e e s r ns e t w ddr s antf a v sdt a afit et c mpywo l r s l i ds s a o t sa to wi o t eudc . d ie h t all o o l ud e ut n imis l f hi cin t u prj ie r h M o et n 20 da ha e a e a pli ifhasf l t c r ha ys ve l ps d, nd antf aied o ompl wih t des rbe y t he c i d c n iin .Ac o dngy t c u t imis st ea to wih u p eudc a dsrke t ec s o dto s c r i l,he o r d s s e h cin t o t rj ie n ti s h a e fom t a tvedocke oft c t Pli ifmay r fl t c am si as pa a ea ton o e r he c i t he our. antf e ie he l i n e r t c i nc pl ntf i pr pa e t c ai if s e r d o ompl w ih t not c tons y t he ed ondii . The Clr i die t d t s nd a c oft sM e o a un Opi on a a ompa ng ek s r ce o e opy hi m r ndt ni nd cc nyi Hay v. SWVRJA-Duffield et al Doc. 8 Or rt pl ntf. de o ai if ENTER:Ths lV- d yo J l, 2016. i a f uy Chi fUnied St t DititJ e t aes src udge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
