Hess v. Viers, No. 7:2016cv00262 - Document 22 (W.D. Va. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 10/14/2016. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
rdFRKS OFFI U. DI PAUW CE S. ST. A ROANOKE, T VA 9! iI #2' . h I TH E UN I N TED STA TES D I STRI T C O UR T C FO R TI E W E STER N DI ' I STRI T O F V I G I I C R N A R O A N O K E DI SI N W O D O NA LD LEE H E SS, 2C1 1i 2 1 ' 26 JULI C, ' ' C BY: CA SE N O .7: 6C V 0 2 1 026 Pl ntf , ai if M EM O M N D U M O PI I N N O BA RR Y V I S, ER By: G l n E.C onrad e C hi fU nie St t sD i t i tJudge e t d a e sr c Dee n t) fnda ts. D onal Le H e s pr e ng pr K ,dl a c vi r ght co pl nt pur ua t 42 U . C. d e s , oc edi o ed i l i s m ai , s nt o S. . j 1 3, l i a c rtd.Tli matri befr t cou tupon dee tsM oto t Dimis 98 whie nc r eae zs te s oe he r fndan ' in o s s , fl d Se e r9,201 On Se e be 1 2015,t c tm al d a notc ad sng He st t ie pt mbe 6. ptm r 2, he our ie ie vii s ha t c two d gi hi 21 da t s i a f rhe c e - f vis or ot r r l va he our ul ve m ys o ubm t ny u t r ountr a sda t he e e nt e de eco r di tng,e ani o a di de e nt e de ebef er lng on def nda s vi nc nta ci xpl i ng r voi ng f nda s' vi nc or ui e nt ' m oton. Theno i wa ne He s i tce r d s : I Pl ntf doesno r s f ai if t e pond t De e ntspl a ngs t Cour wilas um et t o f nda ' e di , he t l s ha Pli if has l ti e es i t c e,a / t t Pli if a e wih wha t antf os nt r t n he as nd or ha antf gr es t t he Dee d n sae i (h jrs o sv p e dng s.I Plitf wih s t c n iu fn a t tts n t e e p n ie la i t) f an if s e o o tn e wih t c e,i i ne s a y t t Pl i if r s nd i a a opra e f s on. t he as t s ce s r ha antf e po n n ppr it a hi Pli ifm a wih t r s ld wih c mt - fi aviso ot ra tona e de e antf y s o e poi t ot era fd t r he ddii l vi nc a o lne a s uti d bove.Howe r i Pl ntf doe notfl s e r s ns wihi t ve . f ai if s ie om e po e t n he t nt one ( ) da pe i t Cour mav dimi s t c e f f itr t we v21 y rod. he t s s he as or a lle o pr osecut e. ( tc ,ECF No 1 )(mp ssi o ii a. Snc mal g t e n tc t He s te c u tha Noie . 6 e ha i n rg n l i e ii h o ie o s, h o r s ) n r cevedno f rhe c e i u t r ommlnia i fom hi a l c ton r m boutt sc e,a t de i f rhi r s hi as nd he adlne o s e pons t eo Hess v. Viers Doc. 22 d fn a t ' to h sp se . Ac o dn l t c u tfn t a, u s a tt Rue41b o te ee d ns moin a a s d c r igy,he o r ids h t p ru n o l ( ) f h Fede a Rul ofCi lPr dur ,He sha f ie t pr ec et saci Se g Ba lr v. r l es vi oce e s s a ld o os ut hi ton. e en. la d Calo 8 2F.d9 (t Ci.1 8 ) rs n, 8 2 3 4 h r 9 9 . Dockets.Justia.com # L ERK M o eo r He shasnotpr dedt c twih hi c r nta e s By o de e e e r ve , s ovi he our t s ure ddr s . r r nt r d J 7,201 t c ur ad s He st tf l et upda eam alng add e swilr ul i une 6, he o t vied s ha aiur o t ii r s l es t n dimis loft sa ton.The c tsmaii da e Se e be 26,201 t pli ifa t a es s sa hi c i our' lng t d ptm r 6, o antf t he ddr s hepr de wih hi c pl ntha bee r t ne ast lve a e. ovi d t s om ai s n eur d mde i r bl Th r fr , o ter a o ssae ,h c u t l ds s tea to wi o tp eudc .S e ee o e f r h e s n ttd te o r wi imis h cin t u rj ie e l h I . t9 (ttn p o. ltg n sa es b e t otmer q ie n sa r s c frc u t r esa d d a 6 saig r K i a t r u j c t i e urme t nd epe t o o r o d r n i ds sa wih u p eu iei a a p o raes n to f rn n c mpl nc l Domel v. oms imis l t o t rj dc s n p r p it a cin o o -o i e ; z l J l a v M g vi eSae Cp p.6 7F.d3 9 3 0 41( dCi.1 8 )(e o nzn adsrc c u t y s a n l ls r , 7 2 3 , 4 - 3 r 9 2 r c g iig itit o r ma u l - s n ed s s a a to pu s n t Fe R. v. 41b) Ana p o it o d rwil n e ti po t imis n ci n rua t o d. Ci P. ( ). p r prae r e le tr h s da y. He si a s d t ti he i e t pr e d wih t sadi n,he mus pe ii t c t s s dvi e ha f nt nds o oc e t hi o t tton he our wihi 30 da of t e r of t s o de f a r nsaeme oft s aci n. Any m o i f tn ys he nty hi r r or ei t t nt hi to ton or r i tt m e s d pr de s cfce a ton f rhi f itr t r pond i atm ey f hi n t ensa e nt houl ovi pe ii xplna i o s a lle o es n i l as o o de e ntsdipostvemoton a t pr vi t c t t a upda e add e s f nda ' s ii i nd o o de he our wih n td r s . The Clr i die t t s nd a c oft sor rt t pli ifa t c e k s r ced o e opy hi de o he antf nd o ouns ofr c d el e or f t de e nt or he f nda . ENTER: vhi s t dyo- tbrzol6. + a focoe - Chi fUn'e Stt DititJ e t d a es src udge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
