LordMaster v. Clarke et al, No. 7:2016cv00256 - Document 21 (W.D. Va. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 9/13/2016. (slt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
w'u ' ua l FI U CE FI L ED . S. ST AT RG NOKEDI . GOUR7 , VA sEP 13 2 1 25 I TH E UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF W RGI A CT NI R O A N OK E DI SI N W O FR ANK I Ju L O RD M A STER , E Pl ntff ai i , V. C LA RK E,e al, t . D ef ndant . e s ) ) ) ) ) ) ) J C. Um BY; zCLERK DEPUW CL ER Ci lAcin No.7: c 00256 vi to 16-vM EM OM NDUM OPI ON NI By: Hon. ihaelF.Ur l M c bansd UniedSt e Diti Judge t ats srct o Fr nki J e Lor a e a dmase , aVigi ai t pr e ng nr K ,c t r1 r ni nma e oc edi omm e d t sci l nce hi vi . a to p rua tt 42U.. j1 8 i M a 2 6a ddn t rpa t efl gf e Un e c ran ci n u s n o SC. 9 3 n y 01 nd i o p e y h ii e . d r e ti n cr lm sa s aprs rm a brng acvi a ton wihoutf l prpa ngt flngf e.28 icl t nce , ione y i i l ci t uly e yi he ii e U. C. 1 5 a( ) () Ho v r 2 U. C. 1 5 g p o d s t nnoe e ts lap io r S. j 91 ()2 ,b . we e , 8 S. j 91 ( ) r vie :ç l v n hal rs ne b igacvla to p o e dn g t o t rp y n o t efln fe . .ft p io e h s o 3 rn ii cin r c e ig wih u p e a me t f h iig e q . i he rs n r a , n o m or pro oc asons whiei a c r t o dea ne i a f c lt br r e i r c i , l nc r e aed r ti d n ny a iiy, oughta a ton ora al n ci ppe . . . t twasdim is d ont g ot t i i fi ous malci ,o f ist sa eac am upo ha s se he r mds hat t s rvol , i ous r al o t t l i n whi h r le m a be g a e unls t prs ri unde i i ntda rofs ro physc c e if y r ntd, e s he ione s r mm ne nge e i us ial ij r ' 2 U. . . 1 5g . Tofl wihnt çmmi e t a e 'e e to ,hep io rs nu y. 8 S C j 91 ()2 al t i he t n n d ng r' xc p in t rs ne ' ' i ' . il y t us be i i ntoroc uni a t tm et c n ur t t mm ne m c ng t he i he ompl i i fl ' Cip a i v.Sani ant s ied.' a glni i , 3 2F.d3 , 3 (t Ci. 0 )(iigAb u - a o dv. t n 91F.d 1 2 (t Ci. 5 3 28 3 0 7h r 20 3 ctn d lW d o Naha , 3 0 3 7h r 1 9 ).Al g to so ' nyapatij r t th sn t e u rd' r i s sce t I . 9 6 ) l ai n f s l e o s nu y ha a o r c re 'ae n uf in . d. Pli ifha ha a las t e no ha a c vi ac insora a sdim is a fi ous a ntf s d t e t hr e n- be s i l to ppe l s s ed s rvol , asm ai i ,orf f ii t sae ac am be or he c lcous or a lng o t t l i f e omm e e t sa ton. Se eg. nc d hi c i e. . , LordMaster v. Clarke et al Doc. 21 Lor se v. vi, 11 v31 ( D.Va M a 1 201 ( s se f f lngt saea dma tr Da s No. :5c 9 E. . y 5, 5) dimisd or aii o tt cam) Lor ma trv. , 1:4c 351( D.Va.M a 1 201 ( s se f f lngt li ; d se Epps No. 1 v1 E. y 9, 5) dimis d or aii o 1Lor t wa f dmaser s onneryknown asJ s Rober Gol r l a on t dade . 2Seto 1 5g , ûe rfre t a t dle srk s' r vso ,sp ro tePrsnLiiainReom cin 91 () o n eerd o s he çz e tie'p o iin i at f h io tg t tr o fr Ac o 1 9 , b L. 1 4 14,1 0Stt 12171(9 6.M caa v. ie Sae, 6 F.d3 1 3 3(t Ci. t f 9 6 Pu . No. 0 - 3 l a. 3 - 1 8 ) le n Untd tts 5 6 3 9 , 9 4h r 20) 0 9. Dockets.Justia.com saeacam) Eod se v. u s x1 S aeP io No. :4-v- 0 ( D. . a 1 , 01 ) tt li ; r ma tr S s e 1 tt rs n, 1 1 c 5 7 E. Va M y 1 2 5 ( imis df rfii t saeacam) God d rv W o d o , . :2 v5 5( . Va De . 2 ds se o al o tt li ; la e . o s n No 7 1 c 0 W D. . c 2 , ng 2 2 ( imis dwih u p eu iea fioo s; e as Coe nv Tol fo 01 ) ds se t o t rj dc s rv lu ) s e lo lma . l s n, U. ,1 5 e S. 3 S.Ct 1 1 ( 5)( di açsrke' s sali c mtdrga dls t t tmi ofa . 759, 765 201 hol ng sti 'dimis s ot e e r e s o he i ng s bsq n a pe l; c a , 6 F.da 3 9 (imis l wih u p eu ief rgio o s s u e ue t p a) M Le n 5 6 3 t 9 d s sas t o t rj d c o v l u ne s s ul n t ee e e fo 2 U. C. 1 5 g ) F rh nnoe tec mp an d e n t le e ho d o b x mptd r m 8 S. j 91 ( ). u te r ,h o lit o s o alg ta Plitf i t e a yi n n tr a o sro sp y ia ij r wi i t eme n n o 2 h t an if s md r n mmi e th e t f ei u h sc ln u y t n h a i g f 8 h U. C.j1 g .I ta t c antc er a c st c t,g ivanc s a dia lt S. 915() nse d,he ompli onc ns c es o ours re e , nd sbiiy a comm odai ; s us soff c a c tonsofc i m e ;amedi lbr e e ; a ra c tons pa t e or e nd ondii onfne nt ca ac lt m ri ge t af low prs r ata f rt a he prs n;a l ga m al Acc di y,t c tdimi s o el ione ; r nse o not r i o nd e l i. or ngl he our s s es tea to wi u p eudc be a ePlitf ddn t ytefl f ewhe h fldt e h cin t t rj ie c us an if i o pa h ii e ho ng n e ie h c mplit S e ec, r ev ame, 8 F.d 1 3 ,1 3 ( 1hCi. 0 2 . o an . e . ..Du e l r2 4 3 2 4 2 7 1 t r 2 0 ) E s 'i ( xT R:r s % h dyo spe e,06 a f etmbr2 1. / +/ : . Unie St t sDititJ g t d a e src e 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
