Hawkins v. Roberts, No. 7:2016cv00235 - Document 5 (W.D. Va. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 6/13/2016. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CL RTSOF IYt. Dl . l . E FC Jo, S - 1 : , ATROAN E,h ' QK 9 ' FI ! LrD I THE UNI STATESDI TRI COUkT N TED S CT J 13 2 1 Ud 06 FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI CT RGI A NI ROANO KE DI SI VI ON J I ' U' , ULJ C B ' Y: ' . r M A U RI H AW K I S, CE N Pl nt f , ai i f Ci lAc i No.7: c 09235 vi ton 16- vM EM O RA ND U M O PI I N N O By: G l n E.C onr e ad Chi f Unied St e D it i tJudge e t at s s r c C/ R O BER TS, O De e a t) f nd nts. M au i e H a ki ,pr ee ng pr K , ied acvi rg sco pl nt ptr ua t 42 U. C. rc w ns oc di o fl i l i ht m ai , zs nt o S. . j 1 8 .By o d re tr dM a 1 , 01 ,hec u t ie tdpanif os b twih n 1 d y 93 r e ne e y 9 2 6 t o r drce litf t u mi ti 0 a s fom t dae o t or ra e c e ve i d sae e f r r ga di e usi of ' he t f he de n xe ut d rie tt m nt o m e r ng xha ton r a i sr tver m e e ,asa e e ofa s t f m,a i t a ot f m ,a a c rii d co dm nita i e di s t tm nt s es or n nma e cc mt or nd e tfe py ofpl n i st s f ac ot sa e e f t sx- o h pe i i aitY nzt und c mt tt m nt or he i m nt rod mmedit l pr e ngt a ey ec di he tlng o t co pli t obt i d fom t a o it prs ofi i lofe c prs n a whih ii f he m a n , ane r he ppr pra e ion fc a a h io t c pli ifi orwasc i d d li t tsx- o hpe i Pl ntf wasad s d t taf l et antf s ontne trng ha i m nt rod. ai if vie ha aiur o c mpl wo l r s li ds sa o t i a to wi o t eu ie o y u d e ut n imis l f hs cin t u prj d c . h M or t n 1 da ha e a ed,a pl i ifha f ie t c m pl wiht de c i e ha 0 ys ve l ps nd antf s al d o o y t he s rbed c n iin .Ac o dn l t ec u t imisstea to wi à t rj dc a d srk stec s o dto s c r igy,h o r ds se h cin t u p eu ie n ti e h a e h fo t a tvedoc toft c t Pl ntf mayr fl t ca msi a s pa a ea ton onc r m he c i ke he our. ai if e ie he li n e r t c i e pli ifi pr pa e t c antf s e r d o ompl wiht not d co to . y t he e ndii ns TheCl r i die t d t s nd ac oft sM e a lm Opi on a ac ompa ng ek s rce o e opy hi mor ndl ni nd c nyi Hawkins v. Roberts Doc. 5 Or rt pl ntf . de o ai i f sxTsR: Iu s 'z. d yo u e 2016. t H a rl n , ChifUnie St t sDititJ e e t d a e src udg Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
