Haga v. New River Valley Regional Jail et al, No. 7:2016cv00216 - Document 7 (W.D. Va. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 8/3/2016. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CL V SAT ncEu.. s c r E oF xs njx oua. m s , FI ED L I vusvxl svavssol vm c, cocl x vso s r . va Ad 23 2 1 2 25 vo u vu s w ssvsux m svm c' ov vm c l I r x a x ROANOKE DI S ON VI I B; Y , ' EK yp R K R O BER T D AV I H AG A, D Pl ntf, ai if Ci lA c i N o.7: c 0021 vi t on 16- v6 M EM O R AND U M O PI I N N O NEW W VER VALLEY REGI ONAL JA IL,et al, . D ef endant s. By: H on.M i chaelF.U rbans ki Unied St e Dit i Judge t at s s rct Robe tD a d Haga a V i g ni i a e pr ee ng pr K ,f l d a c vi rght co pl i r vi , r i a nm t oc di o ie i l i s m a nt . pzs a tt 4 U. C. 1 8 , a n t eNe Rie ValyRe in l al(J i' a dJ i l u n o 2 S. j 9 3 n mig h w v r l r e go a J i G al' n al 1 ) Supe i ende Chari L. fa de e r nt nt le Pof s f ndant . Thi m a t ri be or t c tf r s r e ng, s s t e s f e he our o c e ni p rua to28U.. j1 5 Afe rv e n Plitf' s b s in ,h c t'ds se t e us n t SC. 91 A. tr e iwig an ifs u miso s t e out imiss h c pl i a f i o . om a nt s rvol us Pli ifs svi j 1 be a ehealge ywa no gi nfeec e ofhi medial antf ue a 983 c us le dl s t ve r opis s c 5l ke a t J i. Theco ttmus dim isa a ton orc am fl by a i ae i t c ur e pt t he al tr t s s n ci l i ied n nm t f he o t de e mi st tt ac i orcai i fi ouso f ist sae ac am o whih r le m a be t r ne ha he ton l m s rvol r al o t t l i n c e if y g a td.Se 28U.. j 1 5 e( ) 1 5 b ( ) 4 U. C. 1 9 ec .Thefrtsa a d rn e e SC. j 91 ()2 , 91 A( )1; 2 S. j 9 7 () is tnd r i l ncudescli sba e u s l i s a y me il s l ga t or 'Gcai sofi rnge ntofa am s d pon ç ' ndiputbl rte s e l he y,'tl m al nfi me l ga i e e twhih cla l doe note s ' cli swhe et çf c ua con e i a ecla l e l ntr s c e ry s xit'or am r he la t l t ntons r e ry bas e s' Netkev. iln , U. 31 327( 989 .Alhought c ti r l els .' iz W lims 490 S. 9, 1 ) t he our lbealy co tue pr c ant, ne v.Ker r 404U. 519,5 21( 72) t c tdoe no nsr s o q ompli s Hai s ne, S. 20- 19 ,he our s t Haga v. New River Valley Regional Jail et al Doc. 7 ac asa i a e' a t n nm t s dvoca e s s e de opi s a ut r and c tt i lcl i sno c ea l t , ua pont vel ng t t o y ons iutona a m t l ry r ie i ac mp an .Se Br c v. rol 1 7F.d2 , 43( t Ci. 9 7 ( ti, . as d n o lit e o k Car l, 0 3 41 2 4h r 1 9 ) Lu t J, g c uri ) Be udet CivofHa on,775F. 1 1 (t Ci.1985 ;s eas Go do onc rng ; a tv. t mpt 2d 274, 278 4h r ) e lo r n v.Le ke 574F. 11 11 (t Ci.1 )(ec zi t adititc tsno e ce t e , 2d 47, 51 4h r 978 r ogni ng hat src our i t xpe td o Dockets.Justia.com as umet r eofa s he ol dvoc e f rapr : plitf.Plit f a o s ce di sigt Jio at o o : ani j ani cnn t u c e n un he al r f f . . Su rntnde Pof vi j1 meeybe a ehedi notr c i feec e ofli me c lfl, pei e nt f a 983 rl c us d e eve r opis ls dia ie alege y i vi a i n ofVi g ni sFr e l dl n ol t o r i a' e dom ofI or a i A c . See e. ,Pr valv.Re 57 F. nf m ton t . c. e no, S p 2 3 7 3 0( D. . *9 )(e s nigj isaen tS e s n 'f rj1 3ltg to ) u p. d 0 , 1 E. Va 1 9 r a o n al r o s ro s'o 98 i ain . 9 p i Be a ePl ntf purue i s abl me il s l ga t oresagans t de enda s t c us ai if s s ndiput y rte s e l he i i t he f nt, he compl i i dimis d asfi ous ant s s s e rvol . ExT sR : Thi s VrX dyo Au ut2016. a f g s, 5 f : -V /. M Unied St t D i ti t udge t a es s r c '
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
