Harris v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al, No. 7:2016cv00205 - Document 32 (W.D. Va. 2017)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 1/17/2017. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
' cœ v s OFFI U. DI COURT CE s. ST. AT ROANOKE, VA FIED L J 1 ?2 1 Ad 27 I T H E UN I N TED STA TES DI STR I T CO UR T J C u ou E CL RK x E FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI UF W RGI AB ;' CT NI Y R O A N O K E D I SI N W O CH AR LE S M .H AR R I S, Pl ntf , ai if CL RK E C i lA c i N o.7: 6- vvi ton 1 c 00205 M EM O R AN D UM O PIN IO N VI G I I DEPAR TM E NT O F R N A C O RR EC TI N S,e a1, O t . D ef endant s. By: H on.M i chaelF.U rbansl d U nie St t sD i t i tJudge td a e src Cha l sM . ri ,aVigi ai aepr e ngpr K , ied a c vi r g s a ton re Ha rs r ni nm t oce di o fl i l i ht c i . ptrua t 42U. C.j1983, mi saf o t Vigi aDe rme ofCore tonsa ls nt o S. na ng t f f he r ni pa t nt rci s d fnd ns OnNo mb r29 2 6 t ed f n a t fldamoinf rs mmayj d me t On ee a t. ve e , 01 ,h e e d n s ie to o u r u g n . t en x d y t Clr is e aNo ie a v sngPlitf t a amo inf rsl r j d me t h e t a ,he ek su d tc , d ii anif h t to o l mma y u g n wasfl d a t theha t nt o da fom t Notc t fl ar s e.TheN o i f rhe ie nd ha d we y- ne ys r he ie o ie e pons tce u t r a s d: dvi e f a ntf t e pond t D e e nt s l pl a ngs t Cour w ila sz e t t o f nda ' El e di , he l Pl i ifdoesno r s t l s lm ha Pl i if has l t i e e ti t c s ,a / t t Pl ntf a e wih wha t antf os nt r s n he a e nd or ha ai if gr es t t he Dee a t sae i ter (ij r s o sv p e dng s. l Pli t f wih s t fnd n tts n h i sc e p n ie la i t) f ani s e o f c tnue w ih t c e, i i ne s a y t t Pl i if r s nd i a a o i t on i t he as t s ce s r ha a ntf e pp n n ppr pr a e f s on . .. Howe r i Pl ntf doesno fl s er s ns wihi t t nt a hi . ve s f ai if t ie om e po e t n he we y- o ( )da pe i t Co utm a dim ist c ef f iur t pr e ut ne 21 v rode he t ' v s s he as or al e o os c e. Notc ( no.30)(rgi e ie ECF oi nal mpha i) ss. Plitf d dno rs n t t Noieo t emoinf rsl r u g n ,heNo ie an if i t epo d o he tc r h to o l mma yj d me t t tc wasnotr t dt t c t undelve a e,a Pl i ifha notwrte t t c r snc J y eunw o he our as i r bl nd antf s itn o he ou t i e ul Harris v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al Doc. 32 201 Pur ua t t N otc ent r o N ove be 30, 6, he c t i t tPl i ifha 6. s nt o he i e e ed n m r 201 t our f nds ha a ntf s fie t p o e u eti c s .Ac o dn l,h c mp an i d s se wi u p eudc p ru n ald o r s c t h s a e c r igy te o lit s imis d t t rj ie u s a t ho t Fed. Ci P.41b)d t Pli ifsf l et pr e ut,a a1pe ngmotonsaedeze o R. v. ( ue o antf aiur o os c e nd 1 ndi i r lid : ec ut tst ta1d fn a t fldtemoinfrs mmayj g n. Th o rnoe ha 1 ee d n s ie h to o u x ud met Dockets.Justia.com '! J wih u p eu iea mo t S eLik v W a a hR. Co.37 U. 6 6 6 0 31( 9 2 (û'e t o t rj dc s o . e n . b s R. , 0 S. 2 , 3 - 1 6 ) û h f a hort ofac tt dim iss s ef lc ofpr ec i ha ge r l bee c i r ut iy our o s s ua pont or a k os uton s ne aly n onsde ed a tnhe e po r'... c s rl ve t i c t t m a get i own afar s a t ac e n i r nt we y ne es a iy sed n ours o na he r f is o s o hive t o d rya e p dto ds sto o c s s' he r el nd x e i us ipo iin f a e . i ). ENTER: s /? da ofJ nuay, 2017. Thi y a r * . # în'.)::1 1. i / ..-. è L.;q. 2. è . -.q . '1r ' ,i ? . ...... -. :. . . f ' .. . . . .. . f, . . . . ,r -. . ..'q . . . ' . . $ i.. . . : . ' Um'e St t sDititJ dge ' t d a e src u ' ' . ,
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
