Jackson v. Robinson et al, No. 7:2016cv00180 - Document 16 (W.D. Va. 2016)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 9/22/2016. (tvt)

Download PDF
qk Rgl :: 1 : . 0!% :.p. : . ::. . A D N IkIA T A #(iV FI LED I TI s uxl o s'v ss m sTm cv cocu' x 1 lx r r . IOR TI w ssvsux ol wm c' ov w Rcz a ' R s r xl R O AN OK E DI SI N W O SEP 2) 2 1 25 J UL BM D O N ALD C O R NE LI JA CK SO N US n, ' uR x D , Pli if antf, CiiAcin#o 7:6c -01 0 vl to . 1 -v0 8 V. M EM O R A ND U M O PI O N NI A.DAVI ROBI D NSON,e aI, t . D ef endant s. By: H on.Jact on L. kie ls I sr Seni U nie St t sD i t i tJudge or td a e src Dona d ConwlusJ c on,aVigi ai aepr e ng pr K ,ie a cvi rght aci n l i a ks r ni nm t oc edi' o tld i l i s to . purua t 42U. C.j 1 s nt o S. 983.ByisOr re eedo J y7, t de ntr n ul 2016,heco ta s Pli if t ur dvied antf t thec mplitc n an dmi on d camsa an tmij i e d fn a t i v oaino t ha t o an o ti e s ie li g i s son d e e d n s n i lto f he j Fe a Rul s ofCi lPr ed e The Or r d r c e Pl i i ft fl a am e der l e vi oc ur . de i e t d a ntf o ie n nded c pl i om a nt wih u mi one camsa mij ie d tnd ns Th ör e as ior dplitf ha te t o t s i d li nd son d ek a t. e à r lo n me an ift ' h j t p o s dn n dc mpli mu tsa db isl wih u r frnc t p irfl sa dwn n d r po e me de o ant s tn y tef t o t eee e o ro inj n r e i t a afit èt c mpl wo l r s l i d s sa o tec mp an wih u p eudc . h t alr o o y ud e ut n imis l f h o lit t o t rj ie l De pier c vi a e e i oftme, antf s ug t s e e t co a n a s t e ei ng n xt nson i Pl i if o ht o upplm nt he mpli t nd si pt s e mij i e camsa ans mij i e d fn a t.Alh u hPlitf wi d a a tl l u s son d li g i t so n d.ee d n s t o g an if t rws l r h cai aboutt c c a i ofgood c lm he alul ton onduc tme, silal ge dipa a ecli i vi hi t i he tl le s s r t a ms nvol ng s e ld,ar i o dit r t i to a ce st c urs as tlp e fom apro cvi a ton,a ye i elgi us e , ealai n, c s o o t, e te nt r ir i l ci pr s n t a f r and pe s lpr pe t H ow e r Pl i ifdoe no de c i a s f c e ne i o r ns e , r ona o ry. ve , a ntf s t s rbe uf i i nt xus bet en a oft c am sa de e nt ,a c e nty, ai ifha f ie t c we ny he l i nd f nda s nd ons que l Pl ntf s a ld o ompl wih y t Jackson v. Robinson et al t co tsOr r A c or ngl t m otont n e i de e a f ie, ndt c he ur' de . c di y, he i o m nd s ni d s ' l a he ompl i i ut ant s Doc. 16 d s s e wi o t eudc d t t fil et c mp ypu s a t oFe e a Ru eo Cii imis d t u prj ie ue o he alr o o l ru n t d r l l f v l h z Pr e l e41b .S eBalr v. rs n 8 2F. 9 , 6(t Ci. 98 )(ttn p oK l ia t oc dz () e la d Calo , 8 2d 3 9 4 h r 1 9 saig r i g n s r t mus rs c c to desa dimis i a a o it s nci f non-omplawe ; t e pe t our r r nd s sal s n ppr prae a ton or c it ) Donnel ly v. hnsM mwil SalsCor ,677F. 339,340- ( Ci.1 (e ni ngadititco t Jo le e p. 2d 41 3d r 982) rcog zi src ur Dockets.Justia.com ma s as n ed s s a a to pls a t oFe R. v P. ()' e as Pp nv Da i, y u po t imis n cin t u n t d. Ci . 41b ) s e lo -ma . v s r , 3 U. 1 8 1 2( 9 2 ( oi gac u t yd n amo int a ndd t çmd d ly b d 71 S. 7 , 8 1 6 ) n tn o r ma e y to o me ue o ç ue ea , a t f t ordia o y motveon t pa toft m ova ,r pe t d f iur t cledesc e i sby aih lt r i he r he nt e a e al e o tr i nc e a n me t p e i u l alwe u d ep eu iet t eo p sn p ryb vit eo alwa c o me d ns rv o sy lo d, n u rj d c o h p o ig a t y ru f lo n e f t a ndme orr iiyoft n ndme ' . he me nt utlt he me nt' ) E TRTi fiaospme21. N E :h iyfet br 06 d e , z * Se rUnie St t sDltitJ e ni t d a e src udg

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.