Crabtree v. Clarke, No. 7:2016cv00169 - Document 6 (W.D. Va. 2016)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 5/6/2016. (tvt)

Download PDF

cLE- s OFFI t. .Dl cotR' CE Js sm lr AT ROANOKE;V A FI LED MA û8 2 1 t 26 I TH E UN I N TED STA TES DI STR I T CO UR T C FO R TH E W E STER N DI STR I O F W R GI I CT N A ROANOKE DI I O N V SI JA CK R AN DA LL CR ABTR EE, Pett oner, ii JU BY: . D CLEM CLERK C i lA c i N o 7: 6- vvi ton . 1 c 00169 M EM O M N D UM O PI I N N O V. By: HAROLD YV.CLARKE, R espondent . H on.M i hae F.Urbans d c l l U nie St t sD i t i tJudge td a e src J ck Ra l Cr bte a Vig ni i t pr ee ngpr K , ie ape ii n f rwrtof a nda l a r e, r i a nma e oc di o fld tto o i h b a c r u pu s n t 2 U.. j2 5 a e s o p s rua t o 8 SC. 2 4.Peiin rc le g st vai i o hi t o e haln e he ldt f s t y c nfn me t u s a t ot Ap i 2 , 01 ,u g n o t Ru s lCo ny Cic i Cout Afe o i e n p ru n t he rl 9 2 5 j d me t f he sel u t rut t' tr . r viwi t pe ii t c 'tndst ti s ul bedimi s d sl a iy pu s ntt Rul 4 e e ng he tton, he oul l ha t ho d t s s e lmm rl r ua o e oft RulsGove ng j225 Ca e . he e mi 4 s sl A fderlco tmaynotgrntaj2254ha speii unls t peiine e e a ur a bea tton e s he tto r xhause t td he r e e a l bl i t cot ' o t s a e i w hi pe ii em di s vaia e n he ut f he t t n s ch ttonerw asco c e 28 U . C . nvi t d. S. j2 5 49; S lia v. ec e, 2 U. 8 ( 9 9 ; esrv. d iu z 41 U.. 7 2 41 O' u l n Bo rk l 5 6 S. 38 1 9 ) Prie Ro rc e , 1 S 4 5 v (9 3 ; a tnv. mih, 0 U. 5 ( 9 1 .Peiin ra k wld e t t efldasae 1 7 ) Slvo S t 4 4 S. 3 1 7 ) tto e c no e g s ha h ie tt peii f awrtofha sc puswih t Supr m eCour o Vig ni c t m por ne l wih tton or i bea or t he e t f r i a on e a ousy t t f r lpetton,a t sa ehab speii r m anspe ng wih t Su e Cou tof he ede a ii nd he tt ea tton e i ndi t he pr me r Vigi a. Pe ii rmus r c vear i fom t Supr m eCour ofVigi abe or af der l r ni ttone t e ei ulng r he e t r ni f e e a di ti tc tc n c i rt c ai s a Pe ii ne f ist e t bls a a ua e ba i t s a s r c our a ons de he l m , nd tto r a l o s a i h n deq t s s o t y Crabtree v. Clarke Doc. 6 t f rlpeii Se e. ,Rhi v. e r 544U. 269, ( ) Acc di y,he he edea tton. e. a. nes W be, S. 277 2005 . or ngl t fd rl t in i ds se wi u prj d c a u e ha se Ba e u o t eGndngt a e ea pei o s imis d t t eu ie s n x u td. sd p n h t ho i ht Pe ii rhasnotma t r quiie s tntals wi o de alofac tt i lg a ttone de he e st ubsa i ho ng f ni onsi onali ht s m 1A petton ma bedim is ptrua t Rul 4 i i i cl r9o t peii t tapeiine i no ii y s s ed ls nt o e f t s ea m he tton ha tto r s t e il t r le . ntted o eif Dockets.Justia.com r q ie b 28U. C. 2 5 /)a d S a kv. c ne, 2 U. 4 , 4 ( 0 ) ac riiae e urd y S. j 2 3 n lc M Da il5 9 S. 73 48 20 0 , e t c t f ofa albiiy i de ed. ppe a lt s ni ENT T i V ER: hs dyo Ma, 0 6 a f y2 1. / +/ : . Unie St t D i ti tJ t d a es s r c udge r ' '

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.