Brown v. Kumer et al, No. 7:2016cv00143 - Document 9 (W.D. Va. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 5/6/2016. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
I TI E U NI N I TED STA TES D I STR I CO U R T CT FOR TH E W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI GI A CT R NI RO AN O K E D I SION VI LATRON DUPREE BROMG , Pl ntf ai if, V. M A RTIN K UM E R,etJ/ , Dee a t) f nd nts. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CL : OFFI u.s. sx COURT ERR' CE Dl ATDANVI ,VA LLE FI LED MA 2C 2 1 Y 26 a:IcD DE y R v L , LK , K JA U c i lA c i x o.7: 6- vvi ton 1 c 00143 DE z vcu ptr EM EM O M N DU M O PI I N N O By: Jackson L .K i ser Seni U nied St es Di t ctJudge or t at s ri La r D upr Br w n, oce di pr K , ie a c vi rght co pl nt plr ua t 42 ton ee o pr e ng o f l d i l i s m ai , zs nt o . U. C.j1 S. 983.ByOr re ee M ac 28, de ntrd rh 2016,hec tdrce pli ift s miwihi t our ie td antf o ub t t n 1 da fo t dae oft Or ra i t a ountf 0 ys r m he t he de n nma e cç onn,a ac rii d co ofpl i ifs nd e tfe py antf t s f a ountsa e e f t sxnzt und cc tt m nt or he i mont pe i i e ae ypr ce ng t flng oft h rod mm di tl e di he ii he c ompli ,obti d fom t a opra eprs n o fcalofe hprs a whi h pl i ifi o ant a ne r he ppr i t io fi i ac ion t c aptf s r wa c nfne durngt tsxs o i d i ha i mont pe i OnAprl7,201 t pl i ifr tlne a sgned h rod. i 6, he antf e t d i r i ae a c nm t c ountr por fom t t s of erbutdi noti l t r r sxe t r he nlt fc d ncude he equied i mont h s a e e s On A prl8, 6 t co tga pl i ifone l to r uniy t pr de t r qui e t t m nt . i 201 he ur ve a ntf as ppo t t o ovi he e r d doc e ai n.Oh Aprl11 2016t pl ntf s nti anotc ofc nge ofa e swhih t um ntto i , he ai if e n ie ha ddr s c he cour not d a t n f r r t Aprl8,201 o de dieci t pl ntf t r s t e nd he o wa ded he i 6 r r r tng he ai if o e pond wihi t n t n dayswih t r quie fna i docl nt ton. Aprl22,201 pli ifo eagan onl e t he e r d i ncal tme a i On i 6 a ntf nc i y r lr d ali t a ountr pol sgne by t tus of rbutdi no s ppl t r quie sxetlne r nma e cc e ' i d he r t ûce t d t u y he e r d i m ont sa e e t . Pli ifwa a s d t taf llet c h tt m n s antf s dvie ha aitr o ompl wo d r s ti dimis lo t s y ul e ul n s s a f hi Brown v. Kumer et al Doc. 9 a tonwihoutprj c ci t eudie. M o e t n 1 da ha e a e a pl n i fhas f ie t co pl w ih t des rbe r ha 0 ys ve l ps d, nd ai tf a l d o m y t he c i d c tons Acc di y,t c z dimisst a tonwihoutprj cea srke t c e ondii . or ngl he ou' s se he ci t t eudi nd ti s he as Dockets.Justia.com f o t aci doc toft c ur.Pli tf m a r hl t c am si as pa a eaci n o r m he tve ke he o t a n if y e e he l i n e r t to nce pli ifi pr pa e t c pl wih t not d c tons antf si e r d o om y t he e ondii . . TheClr i die t d t s nd ac oft sM e o a ek s rce o e opy hi m r ndum Opilo à a ompa ng ri n nd cc nyi Or rt pl n if de o ai tf . E R:T i G+ dyo ' 2 1. NTE hs h a f ,06 ! Se rUnie Stt DititJ ni t d a es src udge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
