Morings v. Wells, No. 7:2016cv00139 - Document 77 (W.D. Va. 2018)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 8/8/2018. (ck)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CLERK' OFFI U. DI . COUR7 S CE S, ST AT ROANOKE, VA FI LED AI 28 2 1 J C 22 I TH E U N I D STA TES D I N TE STR I T CO U R T C FO R TH E W E STER N D I STR I O F V I GI I CT R N A ROANOKE DI I O N V SI R AN D Y M O R I G S, N Pl ntf ai if, J U BY: c, DLEY,CLERK D.P T CL RT EUY S! oo Ci lAc i No.7:6 vvi ton 1 4c 00139 M EM O RA N DU M O PIN IO N M S.D .W ELLS,e a . t l, D ef endant s. By: H o M i hae F.Urbans n. c l ki C hi U ni ed St D i ri Judge ef t ates st ct Rand M orngs aVigi ai a epr ee ng pr K ,fl d aci lrght aci n ptruant y i , r ni nm t oc di o ie vi i s to ls t 4 U. C. 1 3 n mig sa fo teRie No t Co r cina Ce tra d fn a t.OnJme o 2 S. j 98 , a n tf f h v r rh re to l n e s ee d n s t 1 , 01 ,h rmar n d fnd n tldamo inf rs mm'r j g n .Ont en x d y,he 2 2 8 t e e ii g ee a tqe l to o u ay ud me t h et a t Clr is e aNoie a v sn Plitf h tamoinf rml r j d me t sflda dt t ek s u d tc , d iig an ifta to o mmay u g n wa ie n ha heha t nt o da fom t Notc t ;l ar s d we y- ne ys r he i e o e e pons TheNotc f rhe a s d: e. ie u t r dvie I Pli ifdoe notr pond t Dee ntspladi ,t Cour wj1aslmet t f antf s es o fnda ' e ngs he t 1 sl ha Pl i if has l t i e e t i t c e,a or t tPl i if a ee wih wha t antf os nt r s n he as nd/ ha antf gr s t t he Dee a t sae i ter (iq r s o i pla ig s. I Plitf wih s t fnd n tts n h i sc . e p nsve e dn t) f an if s e o co i wih t c e, i i nec s a y t t Pl ntf r pond i a a oprae ntnue t he as t s e s r ha ai if es n n ppr i t f hi n .... Howe r i Pl i ifdoe notfl s as o ve . f antf s ie ome r s e pons wihi t t nt e t n he we v- one ( )da pe i t Cour m a dimist c s f f l et pr e ut . 21 y rod. he t y s s he a e or aiur o os c e Noie( n 7 )(rgn l mph ss. tc ECF o. 6 o iia e a i) Plitf ddn trs ndt t Noieo t emoinf rs mmayj g n ,h No ie an if i o epo o he tc r h to o u r ud me t te tc wa notr t ne t t c zt t dei r bl ,a Pl n ifha notm i tn t t c tsnc s e ur d o he olr as m lve a e nd aitf s te o he our i e Aprl201 Ptr ua t t N o i ee e edon J 13,2018, hec tfndst tPli ifha i 8. ts nt o he tc nt r une t our i ha a ntf s Morings v. Wells Doc. 77 fiedt pr e ut t sc e.Ac r ngl t co ai i dimis wihoutprj heplrua al o os c e hi as co di y,he mpl nt s s sed t eudi zs nt c t Fed. Ci P.41b)duet Pli i sfiur t pr ec e,a a1pe ngmotonsaede e o R. v. ( o antY al e o os ut nd 1 ndi i r nid wihou prj c a moot Se Li v.W a s R. Co.370U. 626,63 31'1 (ç t t eudie s . e nk bah R. , S. 0- ( 962) % The a hort ofa c t o di m i s s s e' l k ofpr e uton ha ge r ly be n co i r d ut iy our t s s ua pont f ac or os c i s ne a l e ns de e Dockets.Justia.com alçrhe e tpowe y ... c s rl vese i c t t ma get i own a f r s ast a hi ve t il r n r' ne es a iy t d n ours o na her fais o o c e t or rya e dii dipostonofc es' . he de l nd xpe tous s ii as . ). ENTER : s Thi da o Augus,2018. y f t . ' . g * * ' v + ' . l. . e q 4. 2( >p .. , , ,) ' r u 4 p s. Chi fU nied St t e t ae ' rc udge lti tJ s . 2 . . )t.. . : (z .r : ;. z ;, r d u . v
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
