Blankenship v. Commonwealth Of Virginia, No. 7:2016cv00013 - Document 7 (W.D. Va. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Senior United States District Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 1/29/2016. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
' ! CLERK': cu u.s. sy couRT S oygl oj . . AT DANVILE,vA L FI LED I TH E UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF W RGI A CT NI ROANOKE DI SI W ON ROBERT M CEXNLEY BLANKENSHI PJ Pl ntf, ai if ) ) ) ) COM M ONW EALTH OF VI NI RGI A, ) oee da . f n nt ) J 22 2 1 A8 26 sJHM . D E Cge v L CD LM L ;I UA j DEPUTY CLERK Ci lAdim No.7:6-vvi t 1 c 00013 M EM O M NDUM OPI ON NI By: Hon.JacH on L.Kier s Se orUnied St e Di t itJudge ni t at s s rc ' Robe tM cr nly Blnke hi aVigi ai ae pr e ng pr K , ie acvi rg s r e a ns p, r ni nm t oc edi o fld i l i ht q co ai purua t 42U. C.j 1 seki $500, fom t Co mpl nt s nt o S. 983 e ng 000 r he mmonwe t qfVigni a1h r i a. To sat acl m underj 1 apli ifmus alegeçhevi ai ofarg s c e byt t e ai 983, antf t l t olton t iht e urd he Consi i a lwsoft Unie St t s a mus s tmton nd a he t d ae , nd t how t tt a lged de ha he le pdvai was ton c mmitdb apes n a tn u d rc lro saelw. W et At i , 8 U. 4 4 ( 9 8 . o te y ro cig n e oo f tt a ' s v. kns 4 7 S. 2k 8 1 8 ) ' Ho ve,ti weletbihe t a teCo n at o Vigni i no ap o rd tnd n t we r i s l sa ls d h t h mmo we 1 f r i a s t r pe ee a t o h ti a to S e ec, etv. kns 48 U. 4 , ( 9 8 ; ema v J r a , $U. 6 , h s cin. e . ..W s Ati , 7 S. 2 48 1 8 ) Ed l n . o d n 41 S. 51 6 3( 9 4 .Ac o dngy t c mpliti d s se wih u p eu iea fi lu frp rung 6 1 7 ) c r i l,he o an s imisd t o t rj dc s rvoo s o u s i a i s a y m e il sl lt or t r ove $500, fo t Comm onweat öfVigi a n ndiput bl rtes ega he y o ec r 000 r m he 1h r ni vaj 1 8 . i 9 3l ENTER:Thi s a ofJ nua y,201 y a r 6. . ! Se o Unied St t sDititJ ge ni t a e src ud 1Imus dimisa a i orcai tld bya i t i ldetr net tt aci orcl m i fi o or t s s n cton l m ie n nmae f emi ha he ton ai s rvolus fi t saeacam o whc rl fma bepa td S e2 U.. j 1 5e() 1 5 b ()42U-. al o tt li n ih ei y s e ne . e 8 SC. j 91 ()2 , 91 A()1, SC. ' j 1 9 ec.T f s sa d r i l e camsb sdu nt nids ua l meils lg lh oy'ç li o 9 7 () he l t tn ad ncud s li m e po t n ip tby rtes e a te l 't ams f r a c Blankenship v. Commonwealth Of Virginia i rnge ntofalgali e es whih cea l doe no e s,' cl m swhe et Gacualc e i aecla l nfi me e ntr t c l ry s t xit'or ai r he f t ontntons r e ry Doc. 7 b sls. Netk v. iims 4 0U. 31 3 7(98 ) mees' i e W la , 9 S. 9, 2 1 9 . ' z l Alh u hIlb rl c nsr epoK c mplit, ie v Ke r40 U. 51 , 2 - 1(9 2 , d n t to g ieal o tu r o ansHan s . me, 4 S. 9 5 02 1 7 ) l o o y at sa imaesav ct,saso t dveo igsa o adcnsiuin l li n t lal rie i a cm n n t' d o ae u o ne e lpn tmty n o t to a cams o cery asd n t cmpan.SeBrc v Carl 17F.d2 12 3(t Cl.9 7 (ut , . o crig; eu et . W o o lit e o k . rol 0 3 4 ,4 4h r19 )L tg J, nur )B ad t# Ci f , i c n Ha tn 77 F.d 1 4 1 7 (t Ci.1 8 ) seas Goro v. e e 5 4F.d1 47 1 5 (t Ci. 9 ) mpo , 5 2 27 , 2 8 4h r 9 5; e lo d n Le k , 7 2 1 , 1 1 4h r 1 78 (e o nzngta adsrc c u tsn te p ce t a smeterl o a v aefrap oK pani .1d ciet rc g ii h t itit o r i o x e td o su h oe f d oct o r litm el o n c ntu a yp rino tec mplita mi igu e 2 U.. j2 5 b c ueteCo nwe l o Vigni o sr e n o t fh o an s sn nd r 8 SC. 2 4 e a s h mmo at f r i a o h woul notbeapr pe r po d o r es ndenta i' nota e t anypotntalcl m ha be n e use See e. , nd ts pparnt hat e i ai s e xha td. . a.28 U.. j2 4. SC. 25 Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
