Bakra v. Trent et al, No. 7:2016cv00009 - Document 8 (W.D. Va. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Senior United States District Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 1/29/2016. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
tk . OFRIK u. Il teouv :xR' ; :,:e' AT DANVIQE, L VA I TI E U N I D STA TES D I N I TE STR I T C O UR T C FOR TI E W ESTERN DI I STRI OF W RGI A CT NI ROANOKE DI SI W ON FL D IE J 29 2 1 AN 25 JULA . u ' . I AL. QAHI JI RA HAD AL. ATEEN M BA K RA , Pl nt f , ai i f cuunx BY: Ci lAc i No.7: c 00009 vi ton 16- v- V. By: L M E M O R AND UM O PI O N M TI O TH Y TR ENT ,e al, M t . D e e nt . f nda s l H on. ls n L.K i e Jac t o sr Se orUnie St e Dit i tJudge ni t d at s s r c Aloa r Jha AlM aee Bn a aVigi ai t pr ee ngpr K ,ie ac ant - hia i d - t n kr , r ni nmae oc di o fld ompli p ru n t 4 U. C.j1 3.Plitf nn sTi t yTrn a dG R. J Ad nsrto 'a u s a t o 2 S. 98 an if me moh e t n S R.. miitain' s B. t ed f n a t.Plitf c mpan a o t h g iv n es se a d a c s t j i g iv n e i a h e e d n s nn if o lis b u t e re a c y tm n c e s o al re a c s n j i.Attec n l iho t c mpli tp an ifd ma d $15mil nG o t ewe k Ivesti al h o cuso f he o an, litf e n s . li E r h e s ' a n o f he ebr ahi t f m e off ce a udnewhie e tng a se pi a f rhe s enghi f c s r e t ng he u s e s nd l a i nd l e ng nd u t r e i s ee d o i fo to me' Tl smatri b f r mef rsr e i , u s a tt 28U. C.j1 5 r p n r n f . l te s eo e o ce nng p ru n o ' i S. 91 A. Im us dim ist c pl ntf f lngt sa eacl m upon whih r le m a be t s s he om ai or aii o t t ai c ei f y g a ed. TheTB. R..Ad i sr ton'i notapr pe de e ntt a aci pur ua t r nt S R. J m nitai ' s o r f nda o n ton s nt o j 1 8 .Se W etv Ati , 7U. 4 , 8( 9 8 (e o nii gaj1 8 cam mu t l g t e 9 3 e s . kns 48 S. 2 4 1 8 ) rc g zn 9 3 li s al e h e voain o afd r l i h b apes n a tn u d rc lro saelw) Fec s n v M o z n No ilto f e e a rg t y ro cig n e oo f tt a ; r u o . r a , . 19 c 6 8 1 91U. DitLEXI 8 5 1 9 R 1 5 5 , t*1( D. Y. ln 2 ,1 91 :0 v0 31 , 9 S. s. S 29 , 9 1 1 7 9 a S. N. Jle 0 9 ) (o cu igt tag o p o pes r l l eç dc l t f 'i n t S es n'o p r os so c n l dn ha r u f rome,i s ia sat 's o a t ro 'f r u p e f k me l p j 1 8 ) Alo Plitf sd saif ci nwihaj i' g iv nc s se o a c s t g iva c s 9 3 . s , an if is tsa to t alg re a e y tm r c e s o re n e d e no d srbet vo ai no af d rlrg t Ad msv. c , F.d 7 7 (t Ci. 9 4 . o s t e ci he ilto f e ea ih . a Rie 40 3 2, 4 4 h r 1 9 ) Bakra v. Trent et al Doc. 8 Furhe mor Pl i iff rhe f l t des t r e, antf u t r ais o cdbeTr ntsdelbe aei f e e et t de i to e ' i r t ndif r nc o he prvai n o ab sch ma ne d.S e eg.Sdcde v W aes 9 9F.d 1 7 ,1 8 ( t Ci.1 9 ) f a i u n e e e . , t l r . tr, 8 2 3 5 3 9 4h r 9 3 . Ac o dngy 1ds s t c mplitwi o tp eudc f rfiigt saeacam u o whc c r i l, imis he o an t u rj ie o aln o tt li p n ih h r i m a begr t d. elef y ' e an Dockets.Justia.com E T R:h - dy faur,06 N E Ti F aoJna 21. y Se Unie St t iti tJ ni t d ays src udge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
