Chandler, IV v. Large et al, No. 7:2016cv00008 - Document 7 (W.D. Va. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 2/2/2016. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CL S OFFI U.S. ST. ERK' CE DI OAUA AT ROANOKE, VA it- ( ztE) i I TH E U NI N TED STA TES DI STRI T C O UR T C FE 22 2 1 B 26 FOR TH E W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI NI CT RGI A JUL A , I cu RO AN O K E D I SIO N VI BY; ' ERNEST LI O OD CHANDLER I NW V, Pl ntf , ai if C i lAçton N o.7: 6- vvi i 1 c 00008 V. M EM O M N DU M O PI I N N O CRYS TAL LARGE, AL , :I By: H on.Gl n E.Conrad e ChifUnie St t sDit c Judge e t d a e srit De e f ndant . s Em es Li t nwood Cha e I aVigni i aepr e ng pr K ,fl d a cvi rght c ndlr V, r i a nm t oc edi o e i l i s ompl i ant unde 42 U. C.j1 i t Unie Stts DititCo tf t Ease Dit tof Vigi a i r S. 983, n he td ae src ur or he tm sdc r ni n Nove be 201 Tha co tta f re t ca e he e i J nua y 201 be aus t e nt ofwhih m r 5. t ur ' ns e r d he s r n a r r 6, c e he ve s c Ch n lrc mp anso c re wiln ti c u tsj s ito Byiso d re tr dJ n r 1 , 6 te a de o li c u r d tl h s o r' mid cin. t r e ne e a uay 1 201 ,h i c tad s d pli if a o ot rt ngs t ta f lle t upda e a m alng a e s a tra ta f ro our vi e antf, m ng he hi , ha aitr o t ii ddr s fe r ns e r r l s fom i a ce ai wo d r s ti dim is loft saci eem e r nc r r ton ul e ul n s s a hi ton. T c p o t eJ n a y 1 o d rt a wa mald t plitf a t j i a d e sh p o i e h s he o y f h a u r 1 r e h t s ie o an if t he al d rs e r v d d a b e rtr e a t eie a l,wih a n tto id c tn ta p an if i n l n e a t ej i a e n eun d s md l r be t o ain n iai g h t litf s o o g r t h al nd v of i l c no f wa d hi ma l Re or onlnei c t pl i ifhasbee r e ed fom c t sc as an t or r s i. c ds i ndia e antf n elas r usody,a nd he ha no c a t d t co ta s t ont c e he ur boutt s c s snc he lld i. The ef r ,t co tfndst tpli tf hi a e i e ie t r o e he ur i ha a n if h sfie t mo e u et i a to p s a tt Fe ea Ru eo Cii Pr c d r 41b ,a d s se te a ald o s c t h s cin, m u n o d rl l f v l o e u e ( ) nd imis s h a to wi u p eudc .S eBalr v. ds n 8 2F.d 9 , 6(t Ci. 9 9 (tt p o. l ia t cin t t rj ie e lad Ca o , 8 2 3 9 4h r 1 8 ) sai r K i g n s ho ng t a es b e tt tmerq rme t a dr s e tf rc t'o d r a dd s sa i a a rpraesncin f r r u j c o i e uie ns n ep c o out r es n imis l s n pp o it a to o n n c mp in e ;Do el v.J h - a vle Sae Co . 6 7 F.d 3 9 3 - ( d Ci. 1 8 ) o -o la c ) nn ly o nsM n il ls m , 7 2 3 , 4041 3 r 9 2 Chandler, IV v. Large et al Doc. 7 (p r vngs as o t ds sa o a to u d rRue41b ) a p o i u p n e imis l f cin n e l (). sx Tlu :Thi J4 r s dyo- ray2016. a tubur l , Chi Unie Stt sDititJ ef t d a e src udge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
