Hager v. Commonwealth of Virginia DOC, No. 7:2015cv00685 - Document 6 (W.D. Va. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Jackson L. Kiser on 1/4/2016. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
caRl. olc ' ua. lmcep t t zl E 'a s ld o r AT' ANM LL .v ' D E A FIED L I THE UNI S N TED TATES STRI COURT FOR THE W ESTERN DI DI OFVI NI STRI CT CT RGI A ROANOKE DI SI VI ON M I AEL LEE H A G ER CH J AN - 3J I ui 'c o YU A. L ; ' C i lA c i N o.7: 5- vvi ton 1 c 00685 E , #2 1 25 ' E Pl nt f , ai i f V. M EM OM NDUM OPI ON NI C O M M ON W EA LTH O F VI G I A R NI DOC, De e nt f nda . By: H on.Jac on L . i e ks K sr Se orUnied St e Dit c Judge ni t at s srit M ihae Le Ha ,aVigi ai t pr e ngpr K ,tl d am o i f apr lmi r c l e ger r ni nma e oce di o ie ton or ei na y ijmci n na ngt eCo n at o VignaDOC a t es l d fn a t Alh u h nt to , mi h mmo we lh f r ii s h oe eè d n . t o g Pli ifi vo st Fe r lTo tCli Ac,hi a ton i m o epr pe l co t ed a a ii antf n ke he de a r a ms t s c i s r o ry nsnz s rsng unde 42U. C.j 1 duet t natr ofli cai a adicplnayc cin a r S. 983 o he tle ns l ms bout s i i r onvito nd c a s fc t o i a s a e pr s l s i i a i n n t t i on. Imus dim isa a ton orc am fl by a i t i 1dee mi t tt a ton o t s s ny c i l i ied n nma e f t r ne ha he c i r c am i fi o ,m e ri i i bas d upon l l i s a ym e il s l alt or 'ç am so l i s rvol us aing t s e t ' ndiputbl rte s eg he y, G i f al ' cl i fig me to alj ln eetwhc ce ryd e no e it' rcamswheeteça t a nrn e n f e a itrs ih lal o s t x s, o li ' r h l ct l f z c n e to saece ryb sls . Netk v W il ms 49 U. 31 , 27( 9 9 ; e 2 U.. o tn in r la l a ee s' iz e . li , 0 S. 9 3 1 8 ) s e 8 SC. ' n j 1 5e ( ) 1 5 b () 42U.. j1 9 ec .Net r h Co n at o Vignano j 91 ()2 , 91 A()1 ; SC. 9 7 () i t e mmo we 1h f r ii r he isDe rme ofCorecinsi aS ron'f pur e o 42U. C.j 1 t pa t nt r to s I s ' or pos s f pe S. 983.Se W ilv. e l M ihc nDe 'o S aePoie 4 U. 5 , 0( 9 9 (tt sae a d g v r me tle t is c ia pt f tt l , 91 S. 8 7 1 8 ) iai tt s n o e n na ni e c ng t t a aec nsd rdn o t esaeaen tp ro su d rj 1 8 ) Ac o dn l, anif h t r o i ee nns f h tt r o es n n e 9 3 . c r igy Plitf pur uesa i s a y me il s l ga t or a i tt Comm onweat ofVig ni DOC, s n ndiputbl rte s e l he y ga ns he 1h ri a and Hager v. Commonwealth of Virginia DOC Doc. 6 t ec mpan i d s se wih u p eu iea fi lu . h o li t s imis:d t o t rj dc s rvoo s EN TER : s = ' da ofJ nua y, 201 Thi y a r 6. 1 Se 'rUnie Stt s iti tJ o t d a e src udge Dockets.Justia.com ,
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
