Chandler, IV v. Social Security Administration et al, No. 7:2015cv00672 - Document 7 (W.D. Va. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 1/29/2016. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CLERKSOFFI U, DI COUr CE S. ST. AT ROANOKE, VA FiUD l - I TH E UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF W RGI A CT NI R O AN O K E DI SI N VI O J 2q 2 1 AN 2s J A ' .'' u ULI .'' BY; ERNEST LI O OD CHAO LER I NW V, Pl i i f a nt f , Ci lA c i N o. 15- vvi ton 7: c 00672 V. M EM O M N D UM O PI I N N O SO CI L SE CU W TY A DM I I A N STR ATI N , O e a. / I, Dee f ndant . s By: c RK C H ou.Gln E.Conr e ad Chi fU nied St e D i t i tJudge e t at s s r c Er s Li ne t nwood Cha l rI ,aVigi a i m a epr e ng pr K ,fld a cvi rght c nd e V r ni n t ocç di o ie i l i s ompli ant . unde 42 U. C.j1 3,i t Unie Stt DititCour fr t Easen Dit tof Vigi a i r S. 98 n he td aes src t o he tr sdc r ni n Nove r201 Tha c tta f re t c s he e i De e r201 be us t e nt ofwhi mbe 5. t our r ns er d he a e r n c mbe 5, ca e he ve s ch Ch nde c mpli o c re wihn ti c u tsj s ito a lr o ans c u rd t i h s o r' mid cin.By i o d re tr d De e r1 ,2 5 t r e ne e c mbe 5 01 , s t co ta s d pl i if n he ur dvie antf, mong o he t ngs t ta f lze t u t a m alng add e sa tratans e t r hi , ha aitr o pda e ii r s fe r fr orr l s fom i a c r ton woul r ul i dim is loft sa ton. eea e r nc r e a i d es t n s s a hi c i Th c p o te De e r1 o d rt twa mald t panifa t ej i a d e shep o ie e o y f h c mbe 5 r e ha s ie o li t t h al d rs f r vd d h sb e rt e a t eiea e wi anoain i iaig t tp an ifi n lng ra tej i a a e n eum d s md lv rbl, t h tto ndc tn ha litf s o o e t h al nd ox ca sc nnotf wa d'i m al Re r onlne i caepli ifhasbe n r las d fom c t il n or r h s i. co ds i ndi t antf e ee e r usody,and he hasnotco a t d t c ta nt c e he our boutt s c s snc he fl i. The ef r ,t co tfnds t tpl ntf hi a e i e ied t r o e he ur i ha ai if h sfie t p os c t ti a to , u s a tt Fe ea Rul o Ci lP oc d r 41b ,a dd s se te a ald o r e ue h s cin p ru n o d r l e f vi r e u e ( ) n imis s h a to wi o tp eudc a d zisalp n i moin a mo t Se Balr v.Ca lo ,8 2 F. 9 , cin t u rj ie nd ele 1 e dng to s s o . e lad h rs n 8 2d 3 9 (t Ci.1 8 )(tt p o K l ia t ae s be tt tmerq ie n sa r s c f rc u t r e s 6 4h r 9 9 sai r i g n s r u j c o i e ur me t nd epe t o o r o d r ng t Chandler, IV v. Social Security Administration et al Doc. 7 a dimis i a a opraes nci frnon- o inc ) Donnel v.J - anvil SaesCor , nd s sal s n ppr it a ton o c mpla e ; ly ohnsM le l p. 6 7F.d 3 9 3 - (d Ci.1 8 )(p o igs as o t ds s a o a to t e Rue41b ) 7 2 3 , 4041 3 r 9 2 a pr vn u p ne imis l f cin md r l (). ' Nda a r 01 ENTER: TMS kh' yorl nuay, 2 6. ChifUnie St t sDiti tJ e t d a e src udge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
