Smith v. V-F Controls et al, No. 7:2015cv00669 - Document 11 (W.D. Va. 2015)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 12/15/2015. (tvt)

Download PDF

RKS OF QS t. DI COUW FI - JS, ST; . AT FL.. 9!E, A ..lc ,' V u 'E fi !iiï ; ' ' I TH E UN I N TED STA TES D I STR I C O U R T CT FOR TH E W ESTERN DI STRI OF W RGI A CT NI R O A N O K E D I SION W ANTHONY SNHTH , pE' 15 2 1 o * 25 JUL .v 'v .-a u L'- .' '.jY s '- , z) BY' D L CASE NO.7: 15CV00669 Pl ntf ai if, V. M EM O M N D UM O PI I N ON V.F.CONTROLS,c AL. , By: G l n E .C o e nrad ChifUnie St e Dit c Judge e t d at s srit Def ndant . e s Ant hony Smih,a Vigi ai t pr ce di pr K ,fl d t sc vi aci n,cli i t t t r ni nma e o e ng o ie hi i l to am ng ha . t de e nt ha vi aed li pa e trg s1 Sm ih ha alo moved f per s i t pr e he f nda s ve olt zs t n i ht . t s s or mi son o oc ed j f r p u rst e 28U. . j 1 5b , t u p e a me to t cvi fl f e Afe . o ma a pei md r q SC. 91 () wi t rp y n f he i l ii e . tr ho ng r viw oft rco d,t c r fndst tt a to fld L f ee he e r he ou t i ha he cin, ie q onnapa rs mus besl rl upei, t lmmaiy ds s e wi u prj d c b sdo S t sp ircvia to ta h v b e ds se imis d t t eu ie a e n mih' ro i l cins h t a e e n imis d. ho ThePrs Liiai Reor Ac of1 s tntal n nde t i f mapa rs ion tg ton f m t 995 ubsa ily me d he q or upei saue 2 U. C.j1 1 . Th p r os o t e Ac wa t rq ie alp io rl ia t s i tt t, 8 S. 9 5 e u p e f h t s o e ur 1 rs ne i g n s ung t gove nme e ii s o ofk i l t pa tlng f esi 1 1,eihe t ough pr pa ntortloug r nt ntte r t a s o y ii e n 1 t r hr e yme lr h isal n s wi hed fo t l ia ts imae tu ta c t t j1 5 b . Se to 1 5 g n tlme t t l r m he i g n ' n t r s c ol . 91 ( ) ci n 91 () h t n delest i t lm e pa e m ehod t prs r who ha Ghr e srke '- t eprs r li he nsal nt ym nt t o ione s ve G e ti s' hos ione s t who ha ha t e pr vi c eso a as d s s e a fi ous m a i ous orf rf itr t ve d hr e e ous as r ppe l i mis d s rvol , lci , o a lle o saeacam, re stet re srk rimaes wstmmi n d ng ro s ro p ysc lij r ' tt li ul s h h e -ti e n t ho G ne t a e f eius h ia nu y. l i ' Smith v. V-F Controls et al j 1 5() 91 g . Doc. 11 Sm ih ha br ug s h a tonsora t s o ht uc c i ppeaso t eeorm o eprorocc i ns SeeSmih v. l n hr r i aso . t Mc t e No 6:0 0 2 ( . Va Jme 8 2 0 ( imis d wih p eu ie f rf i r t clr, . 1 CV0 0 2 W D. . t , 01 ) ds se t rj d c o al e o l u 1 Smih fld t s acin i t Unie Stt s DititCou f t W e tr Diti ofKe uc , but t ie hi to n he td a e src rt or he se n srct nt ky b c u et c u eo a to o c re wi i tej s ito o t sc u ttec s wa ta fre h r . e a s he a s f cin c urd t n h midcin fhi o r,h ae s rnser d ee h Dockets.Justia.com saeacam) S t v. c t e e a, v l to No. 1 c 0 3 6( . Va J l 2 , 01 ) tt li ; mi M clr . t 1Cii Acin 7:4-v- 0 5 W D. . uy 2 2 4 h l ( imisd t e 28U. C.1 5e ()B)a fi lu a d maiius;S t v. c t e No. d s se md r S. 91 ()2 ( s rvoo s n lco ) mih M clr , l 7:4 0 5( . Va Jme1 , 01 )( imisdt e 28U. C.1 5 e ()B)f rf i l t 1 CV0 28 W D. . t 0 2 4 d s se md r S. 91 ()2 ( o alr o te saea cam) Ac o dn l,S t ma p o e d j fr p u e i ( t o tp e a me to t e tt li . c r igy mih y r c e . o ma a p rs wih u r p y n f h q fl gf e o l i h s o t t efc si n n d ng ro sro sph sc ln u yrltdt h s ii e ) ny f e h ws ha h a e mmi e t a e f eiu y ia ij r eae o i n c re tcams j 1 5 g . S t salg to fi t s o t a t alg dpae tv oain o urn li . 91 ( ) mih' l ains al o h w h t he le e tn i lto s f e whih hec c ompl i i t sa ton ha plce hi i i i ntda rofphysc lhn m . ans n hi c i ve a d m n mm ne nge ia r Be a s t r c r sr fe t h tS t h sa latt ret tie 't e j1 5 g a dh s c u e he e o d elc t a mih a t e s h e i rk s'md r 91 () n a s not de monsr t d t the i i i i nt d nge ofphysca hn t c tdeles Smih t ta e ha s n mm ne a r i l nn, he our ri t he o p ru t t p o e d L f r p u ei a d d s se t e c mp an wi o tp eu iet e p o tni o r c e q o ma a p rs n imis s h o lit t u rj dc md r y h j1 1 ( )2 An a p o rat or rwili s t sday 9 5g . p r p i e de l s ue hi . The Clr i die t dt s nd co e oft sme or ndum o ni a a ompa ng ek s rce o e pi s hi m a pi on nd cc nyi or rt pli tf. de o a n if ENTER:Thi I M d yo De e e, 01 s S a f cmb r2 5 . ChifUnie St t sDititJ e t d a e src udge 2 M or r Sm ih' cu rntcli ,e s ntal e val t t cams i hi pror cvi aci , a e eove , t s re ams s e ily qui ent o he li n s i i l tons r m alci ,lgaly gi ous a f lt saea a tona ecl m . i ous e l vol , nd ai o tt ny ci bl ai

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.