Ballance v. Clarke et al, No. 7:2015cv00645 - Document 65 (W.D. Va. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 6/16/2016. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
nlPRK! oFFI t..Dl colr S cq J: sT, l ATRQANQV ! VA Fl tnn I TH E UM TED STA TES DISTRI T C O UR T N C FOR TI E W ESTERN DI I STRI OF W RGI A CT NI R O AN O K E DI I O N V SI K EV I B ALLA N CE , N J 16 2 1 Ld 22 JUL . I BY: CA SE N O .7: 15CV 00645 Pl ntf , ai i f V. M EM O M N DU M O PI O N NI HAROLD CLARKE, M z, c . By: G l n E .Conr e ad C hi fU nie St t D i t i tJudge e t d a es s r c Dee n t) fnda ts. Ke n Ba lnc ,a Vigi a i t pr e di pr K ,fl d t s cvi rght a to unde vi la e r ni nma e oc e ng o ie hi i l i s c in r 4 U. C.j1.3 algn t t h d f n a t io o fcasa Iie No t Co rcin lCe tr 2 S. 9 , l ig ha t e e e d n prs n fiil t tv r rh re to a n e 8 e wihhel hi pe s lpr pe t Ba lnce i now c t d s r ona o ry. la s onfne a Gr e Roc Core tonalCe e , d t en k rci nt r whe e one oft de e nt wa r e l a nt d aswa de Bal nc hass r he f nda s s ec nty ppoi e r n. la e ubmit a lte ted e tr al gi t t Gr n Rock ofi i s a e r t itng a ns hi f t s l ws t a he as t le ng ha ee fcal r eala i gai t m or hi a ui, nd ks he c u t oG tpt ertl to a dh r sme t' ( No 6 , t2. Th c u t o t e t elte o r t t o h eai in n aa s n ' ECF . 3 a ) e o r c nsnls h etr s a a amo inf ritro u o yijmci erle t a mu t ed nid. s to o n elc t r n t tv eif h t s b e e Bal nc al ge t t snce Gr n Roc ofi i l lnr d a la e le s ha i ee k fc as e ne bout t s l ws t t ha hi a ui, hey ve r f s d t a l hi outofhi c l t pe f hi wor dutes i hef l t do hi wor o quis e u e o low m s el o ronn s k i ; f ais o s k r t t ej b h c n alg dl b c r e wi a ds iln r ifa to Baln e as alg st t h o , e a le e y e hag d t icp ia y n rcin. la c lo l e ha h e ofi e st booksfom hi cela a e now r quii hi t pa f rt boo .He al ge t t fc r ook r s l nd r e rng m o y o he ks le s ha li lnt n g rRrie hsb s t p nih imae . (d. zs lima a e tlqs i e t o u s n ts' I ) ' Ballance v. Clarke et al Doc. 65 Th p ry s e ig ap ei n r ij n to mu tma eace rs wi lha h i lk l e a t e kn r l ay n u cin s k la ho ng t t e s i ey mi t t s e d on t me is he i lkey t s f rir pa a e ha m i t a e e ofpr i i r o ucc e he rt ; s i l o uf e re r bl r n he bs nc elm na y r le ' h tt ebaa c o e ute tp i h sfvo ;a d a ijmcin i i t ep lcitrs. eif t a h ln e f q iis i s n i a r n n n l to s n h ubi n ee t' , ' W itr#. trlRe . f Co n is nc,5 5U..7 20 (0 ) S c itro u o yij n tv n e Naua s De . u clI . 5 S , 2 08 . u h ne lc tr n u cie Dockets.Justia.com , ERK C r le i ta e r or na y r m e t tm a o y be a r d upon a cla s wi t t t e if s ln xta di r e dy ha y nl wa de e r ho ng ha he pl i ifi e il d t s h r i . l a 22. antf s ntte o uc elef' d. t ' Bala ef l t sae f c sm e tng t s f z r r d elm e s lnc ais o t t a t e i he e olr equie e nt.Asa i ta m a tr hi n nii l te , s alegai nsofr t lai n ar m e el c us r and t r o e do no i cae a lke i l to e aito e r y oncl o y, he ef r , t ndi t ny i lhood of s c e so artlai n cam. Se Ad msv.li e 4 F.d 7 ,7 ( t Ci.1 9 ) Smi ry u c s n eaito li e a tc , 0 3 2 4 4h r 9 4 . i l l, a be a e Ba lnce doe nof de c i a hn he ha s f r d fom t a l dl r t laor c us la s s rbe ny nn s ufe e ' r he lege y e ait y aci ,he f ist m a a s tons al o ke ny howi ofi i ntir pa a e hn m. The c tcn ng mm ne r e r bl r our nnotfnd t t ha he has de monsr t d gr mds on wlih i eroc or r i i wa r t ta e ot lc nt l ut y elef s ran ed. M os i t mpora l tnty, Balanc does not i c t t t he has e used a nita i r m edis as t hi cai of l e ndi a e ha xha t dmi sr tve e e o s l ms r t la i a Gr e Roc a r uie be or he ca ltga e s h cai i t s c t Se 42 e a iton t e n k, s eq r d f e n ii t uc l ms n hi our. e U. C.j 1 9 ea . Un i he h s gv n pds n o fcasa o po t t t a d e st รง alg d S. 9 7 () tl a ie o fiil n p rt y o d rs h l e mi e vi a i ,heca s oltons n how neihe lke i t r i lhood ofs ce sno lkelhood ofi ne hn m . uc s r i i mmi nt r Fort sa e r s ,t c tc l st tBala c he tt d ea ons he our oncude ha lnce nnno m a t nec s a y,f t ke he e s r our f tr s ac o hoki t t hi st to wa r nt i e l u or r i a wilde hi moton. An ng ha s iua i n ra s nt roc t y elef nd l ny s i a pr pra eor rwilis t sda p o it de l s ue hi y. The Cl r i dieced t s nd c e of t s m e a lm opi on a a ompa ng e k s r t o e opi s hi mor nd l ni nd cc nyi or rt pl i ifa c uns ofr co d f t def nda s de o antf nd o el e r or he e nt . E TR TiJ dyoJ e21. N E : hs $ a ft ,06 m Chi fUzie St t DititJ e ltd aes src udge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
