Jones v. Law Firm of America et al, No. 7:2015cv00609 - Document 2 (W.D. Va. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 11/10/2015. (slt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FOR TH E W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI NI CT RGI A ROAN OK E DI SI VI ON O W AI AN M . JONES, I Pl ntf , ai i f CL S OFFI U.s. ST. ERK' CE DC COUR' . AT ROANOKE, VA FIED L N0V 12 21 25 JULA . I DUD BY: Ci lA c i N o.7: c 00609 vi t on 15- v- D , C RK 1' E A M EM OM NDUM OPI ON NI LAW FI RM OF AM ERI CA,e al, t . D ef endant s. By: H on.M i hae F. r ns c l U ba ki U ni e St e Di t i Judge t d at s s r ct Owaian M . ones aVigi ai t pr e ng nr K ,c m e ed t sc vi a ton i J , r ni nma e oc edi o om nc hi i l c i . pu s a t o4 U.. j1 3 Upo arv e o c u t e o d ,ta pe r t t anifha a lm t ru n t 2 SC. 98 . n e iw f o r rc r s i p a s ha Plitf d t e s t eenon- be cvi a tonsora al dim is d a fi ous a ma ii ,o f rf lngt sa e hr ha as i l c i ppe s s s e s rvol , s lc ous r o aii o t t ac am be or hec me d t saci n. Se ea. J ne v. t d St t so Ame ia, 7: 4li f e om nce hi to e. . , o s Unie a e f rc No. 1 c -0 0 si o a 23( . Va Au . , 4,bp a ds se c 'ioo sNo 1 - 8 ,lp v0 41 , l p. t - W D. . g 6 201) a el imisd l v lu , . 471 8 si p t o . t (t Ci. c 1 201 ) J ne v. ie S ae DititCo r f rt eW e tr Ditit f p a 2 4 h r De . 6, 4 ; o s Untd tts src u to h sen src o Vign a No. :4 c - 0 9 , l o a 2( . Va Se . 0 2 4 , e as M c a v Un td r ii, 7 1 -v 0 4 9 si p. t W D. . pt3 , 01 ) s e lo Le n . ie p . Stts 5 6F.d 3 1 3 9(t Ci. 0 9 ( imis l wi o t eu ief rfi lu ne ss o d ae , 6 3 9 , 9 4h r 2 0 ) d s sas t u prj d c o rvoo s s h ul h notbee mptd fom 28U. C.j1 5( ) l s hast rc dpr de noras t e mpt xe e ' r S. 91 g). na muc he e or ovi s e on o xe Pli t ffo 2 U. C. 1 1 ( ) tec u t imisst sa to wih u p eu ief rP an ips ani r m 8 S. j 9 5g ,h o r d s se hi cin t o t rj dc o litf f f iur t pa t flng f ewhe slng t c a l e o y he ii e n i he ompl i . Se e. ,Dunr ev. l r 28 F. 1 4, ant e. R. e Pa me , 4 3d 23 1 3 ( 1h Ci. 0 2 (e s nngt ttefln f ei d eu nfl gacv l cinwh nt f r 2 7 1 t r 2 0 ) ra o i ha h i g e s u po ii i n ii a to e q o ma pa rspr sonsdo nota yt pl ntf a t tt c ti no r quie t pe tpli ifa upe i ovii ppl o ai if nd ha he our s t e r d o nni antf n opporuniyt pa t flngf a trr c ni ngpli ifi i lgi et pr e L f nna t t o y he i ee fe e og zi antf s nei bl o oce d q o Jones v. Law Firm of America et al pa rs. upe i) ENTER Doc. 2 : Thi s . j) ) fœ ' da ofN o be , 5. y vem r 201 ë * . . Unie St t sDititJ t d a e src udge Dockets.Justia.com r . ,z.. .
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
