Jones v. Neely et al, No. 7:2015cv00603 - Document 2 (W.D. Va. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 11/10/2015. (slt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CL ERKS OFFI U. D' couF , CE 2. 3T. r AT ROANOKE, VA FIED L f. I THE UNI S N TED TATESDI TRI COURT S CT FOR TH E W ESTERN DI STRI O F VI CT RGI A NI RO AN O K E D I I V SION Ngy jg 2 j g5 2 l C DuD . cL K ULA . BY: DEP OW AI AN M . I JONES, Ci lAc i No.7: c 00603 vi ton t5-v- Pl nt f , ai i f V. M EM O R AN D UM O PI I N N O W I A M N EELY ,e aI, LLI t . D efendant s. By: H o M i hae F. rbans n. c l U ki U ni e St e D i t i tJudge t d at s s r c Owai n M .J s aVigi ai t pr e ngpr K ,c me e t scvi a on ia one , r ni nma e oce di o om nc d hi i l di purua t 42U. C.j 1 s nt o S. 983.Upon ar viw ofc trc ds ia a st tPli ifhada lat ee our e or ,t ppe r ha antf tes t e no ha asci la tonsora al dim is a fi ous a ma ii ,o f rf lngt sae hr e n- be vi c i ppe s s s ed s rvol , s lc ous r o aii o t t a c a m be or he c m m e e t sa ton. Se e. , nesv. nie St t ofA m e i a, o. 1 li f e o nc d hi c i e. c. Jo U t d a es r c N 7: 4- c - 0 0 si o a 2 3( . Va Aug 6 201 ) a p a ds s e g fio o , .1 - 8 , l v 0 41 , l p. t - W D. . . , 4 , p e l imis d . rv lus No 4 71 8 si p g p o a 2 (t Ci. c 1 20 4 ; o sv. ie S ae DititCo r frt eW etm Ditito p. t 4 h r De . 6, 1 ) J ne Untd tts src u t o h se src t Vicna No. 1 -v 0 4 9 si o a 2( . Va S p . 0 2 4 ; e as M c a v Untd r ii, 7:4 c - 0 9 , l p. t W D. . e t 3 , 01 ) s e lo Le n . ie p S ae , 6 F.d3 , 9 ( t Ci. 0 9 ( imis l wi o t rj d c f rfio o s s s o d tts 5 6 3 91 3 9 4h r 2 0 ) ds sas t u p eu ie o rv l u ne s h ul h n t ee e tdfo 2 U. C. 1 5 g ) I a mu h a t rc r p o i e n ra o t e e t o b x mpe r m 8 S. j 91 ( ). n s c s he e od r v d s o e s n o x mp Plitf fo 2 U. C. 1 5 g ,h c u t imis sti a to wih u p eu ief rPlitf s an if r m 8 S. j 91 ( ) te o r d s se h s cin t o t rj dc o an if f iur t pa t flng f ewhe flng t c a l e o y he ii e n ii he ompl i . See e. , r ev. me ,284F. 1 ant . g.Dun e Pal r 3d 234, 1 3 ( 1h Ci. 0 2 (e s nng. ttefln fei d eu n fl acvia to wh nL fr 2 7 1 t r 2 0 ) ra o i t h i g e s u po ii ha i ng i l cin e q o ma pa rspr sonsdo nota yt pl ntf a t tt co ti notr quie t pe mi pli ifa upe i ovii ppl o ai if nd ha he ur s e r d o r t a ntf n opporuniyt payt flngf ea trrcog zngpli ifi i i bl t pr e L f ma t t o he ii e fe e nii antf s nelgi e o oc ed q or Jones v. Neely et al na i) upers. ENTER: Thi s Doc. 2 /Az dy f oebr 05 u aoNvm e21. , + * . . ).y é,. gy, , ,. s .j , . j . U nie St t s D it i tJ t d a e s r c udge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
