Joyce v. Philips, No. 7:2015cv00549 - Document 21 (W.D. Va. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 12/16/2015. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
' CL ' OF IEU, DITCOUdn ERKS FC S. S. . . , s) I #.(:'. 'OKE!VA ' . a C. !: Jè:: 3 I THE UNI N TED STATES DISTRI COURT CT FOR TH E W ESTERN DI STRI OF W RGI A CT NI ROANOK E DI SI W ON ROBERT STEVEN JOYCE, DE2 17 2 1 25 JULA ' ' t -' BY: CASE NO.7: 5CV00549 1 Pl ntf , ai if V. M EM OR ANDUM OPI ON NI S PHI PS, AL , GT. LI c By: Gln E. n a e Co r d Chi fU nie St e Di t i Judge e t d at s s r ct De e a t) fnd nts. Thec u t imisd wih u p eudc t i p o. , io e cv l ihsa to pl s n t o r ds se to t rj ie h s r K prs n r ii rg t cin z ua t o r 4 U. C. 1 8 f rf il et saeacam a dd ne plitf moint n n , a e o l s 2 S. j 9 3 o al r o tt li n e id an ifs to o me d b s d n l z i fi let e h us a mi srtv rme isa t lso ii lcams Se 4 U. C.j1 9 ea . al r o x a t d nitaie e de s o l rgna li . e 2 S. t i 9 7 () P an ifn w mo e f rr c n ieain o t d s sa o d r S e F d R.Ci P.5 () He litf o v s o e o sd rto f he imis l r e. e e . v. 9 e . as s e t n e hi co ant onc a i al gi t t he has be n t e t obti lo e ks o m nd s mpli e gan, le ng ha e mabl o a n a mi srtv rme y fr a Re Ono S aeP io Hea kst c u t ois ea ij n to d nitaie e d o ms t d in tt rs n. s he o r t su n n u cin die tng ofi i l t r t pr vi s h f ms Pl i if f l t de onsr t howe r a rci fc as he e o o de uc or . antf ais o m ta e, ve , ny g ot o whi h he i e il d t r i fom t or r dim isng hi orgi l c r md n c s ntte o elef r he de s s i s i na ompli . a nt Ac r ngl t co tfndsno g omd on whih t gr ntt r le pl i ifs e a wilde co di y, he ur i rt c o a he ei f antf e ks nd l ny li m o i An a o it o de wilis t sda M or ove ,t co tno e t tt alege ls ton. ppr pra e r r l s ue hi y. e r he ur t s ha he l d de alofa e st a sa e prs s gre nc pr e le doesnotsae a cli a to bl t r ni cc s o t t ion' iva e oc dtr tt am c i na e mde j 1 8 ,snc imae ha en c n t uina rg tt ag iv n ep o e u e Ad msv Rie 4 9 3 i e n t s v o o si to l ih o re a c r c d r . n . c , 0 t Joyce v. Philips Doc. 21 F.d 72,75 ( h Ci.199 . TheClr i die tdt s nd c e oftlsme a l o ni 3 4t r 4) ek s r ce o e opis li morndlm pi on a a ompa ng or rt pl n if nd cc nyi de o aitf. ENTER:Th s l d y o De e r 201 . i t a f c mbe, 5 Chi Unie Stt sDiti tJ ef t d a e slc udge Dockets.Justia.com '
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
