Jones v. MC XU et al, No. 7:2015cv00539 - Document 2 (W.D. Va. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 10/9/2015. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CLERK' DFFI U..DI COURT S CE S SX AT ROANOKE, VA F? LED I THE PNI N TED STATES DI STRI CO URT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI NI CT RGI A ROANOKE DI I O N V SI O W A I A N M .JO N ES, I Pl ntf , ai if ) ) ) ) ) ) ) V. M C XU,e al, t . D efendant s. 0ST 2S 2 1 25 J A C. U u , ULI . BY; DEP C i lA cton N o.7: vvi i 15-c 00539 M EM O R AN D UM O PI O N M By: H on.M ihae F.Ur c l bansd l U nie St e Di t i tJudge t d at s s r c Ow a i n M .J ne ,a V igi a i a e pr e ng pr K ,c m e d t sci la ton ia o s r ni nm t oce di o om nce hi vi c i purua t 42U. C.j 1 s nt o S. 983.Uponarviw ofc tec ds i a ast tPli ifha a las e e our r or ,t ppe r ha antf d t e t t e no ha a cvi aci nso a a sdimi s d asfi ous a m a ii us orf f ii t sae hr e n- be s i l to r ppe l s s e rvol , s lc o , or a lng o t t a ca m bef r heco me e t sa to Se .e. ,J ne v. t St t ofAm e i a, 7: 4li oe m nc d hi ci n. e c. o s Unied aes rc No. 1 c 0 41 , l o a 2 3( . Va Aug 6 20 4 , p a d s se g fio' , .1 - 8 , lp v- 0 0 si p. t - W D. . . , 1 ) a pe l imis d . rv lus No 4 71 8 si p x o op. t2( h Ci.De 1 201 , nesv. tdStt DititCour f t W etr Dititof a 4t r c. 6, 4) Jo . Unie aes src t or he sen src Vigni No. 1 c 00499,si op. t2( . Va.Sep . 201 ,s eas M cva v. td r i a, 7:4-vlp a W D. t 30, 4) e lo te n Unie . S ae , 6 F.d39 , 99( t Ci. 0 9 ( imis l wi u p eudc f rfi lu n s s o l tts 5 6 3 1 3 4h r 2 0 ) ds sas t t rj ie o rvoo s e s h ud ho no b e e tdfo 28U.. j1 5 g ) n s c a ter c r p o ie n ra o t e e t e x mp e r m SC. 91 ( ).Ia mu h s h e o d r vd s o e s n o x mpt Plitf fo 2 U. C. 1 5g ,h c u t imis sti a to wih u p eu ief rPlitf s an if r m 8 S. j 91 ()t e o r d s se h s ci n t o t rj d c รถ an if f iur t pa t flng f ewhenflngt c a l e o y he i e ii he ompli .Se e. , ant e, :.Dupr ev. me , 4 F. 1 e Pal r 28 3d 234, 1 3 ( 1h Ci. 0 2 (e s nngt a t fln fei d eu nfl acvia to wh nL fr 2 7 1 t r 2 0 ) ra o i h the iig e s u po ii ng i l cin e q o ma pa rspr vii dono a yt pli ifandt tt co ti no r uie t pe m i pli ifa upe i o sons t ppl o antf ha he ur s t eq r d o r t antf n Jones v. MC XU et al Doc. 2 opport t t pa t flngfeafe rcog zngpli ifi i lgbl t pr e L f ma t y o y he i e tr e nii antf s neii e o oc ed q or mi pa rs. upe i) ' y v u ni q : s: s x dyr c br21. aoot e 05 o, 4 /- 4 J /.W &-: ' ze . U nie St t s Di t i tJ t d a e sr c udge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
