Jones v. Kroger Stores et al, No. 7:2015cv00538 - Document 2 (W.D. Va. 2015)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 10/9/2015. (tvt)

Download PDF
< . nlGRK' OFFI U.S. ST COURT S CE DI . AT ROANOiE, I VA Ff6D L I TH E UN I ED STA TES D I RI CO UR T N T ST CT FO R TH E W E STER N D I STR I O F V I G I A CT R NI R O A N O K E D I ISIO N V O W AI AN M .JO NE S, I Pl ntf ai if, 021 2q 2 1 25 2 A . ' L ' C RK ULl D BY; ' C i lA c i N o.7: c 00538 vi ton 15- v- M E M O M N D UM O PIN IO N K RO GER STORES,e al, t . D efendant s. By: H on.M i hae F.U r c l bans ki U nied St es Di tri Judge t at s ct Owa in M .J ne ,aVigi ai aepr e ng pr K ,c me e t scvi a ton ia o s r ni nm t oce di o om nc d hi i l c i p ls a tt 4 U. C. 1 8 .Upo ar ve o c u t e o d ,ta pe r ta Plitf h da lat t u n o 2 S. j 9 3 r n e iw f o r r c r s i p a s h t anif a t e s t e no ha asc vi a tonso a a sdim is a fi ous a m a ii ,o f rf lngt sa e hr e n- be i l c i r ppe l s s ed s ' vol , s lc ous r o aii o t t r a c a m be or he c m e e t sa ton. Se e. , onesv. nie St t s o A m e i a, o. 1 li f e om nc d hi c i e. c. J U td ae f r c N 7: 4- c - 0 0 si o a 2 3( . Va Au . , 01 ) a pe l imis dg fio o s No 1 - 8 , lp v 0 41 , l p. t - W D. . g 6 2 4 , p a ds se . rv l u , . 4 71 8 si p o a 2 (t Ci. c 1 , 4 ; o e v Uztd Sae DititCo r f rteW e tr Ditit f p. t 4 h r De . 6 201 ) J n s . l e tts src u to h i sen src o Vigi a No.7:4-vr ni, 1 c 00499,si o a 2( . Va. pt30,201 ;s as M c nv.Unie lp p. t W D. Se . 4) ee lo Lea td S ae , 6 F.d 3 , 9 (t Ci. 0 9 ( imisl wih u p eu iefrfioo s e ss o l tts 5 6 3 91 3 9 4 h r 2 0 ) d s sas t o t rj dc o rv lu n s h u d notbee mpt fo 28U. C.j1 ( ) I s hast r c dpr de nor s t e mpt xe ed r m S. 915g). namuc he e or ovi s ea on o xe Plitf fo 2 U. C. 1 5g ,hec u t imis st sa to wi o t rj d c f rPlitf s anif r m 8 S. j 91 () t o r d s se hi cin t u p eu ie o anif h f l et pa t flngf ewhe flngt co pl n . Se e. ,Dupr v.Pam e ,284 F. 1 aiur o y he i e n ii he m ait e. c. ee l r 3d 234, 1 3 ( 1h Ci. 0 2 (e s nngt a t efln fei d eu nfln acvia to wh nL fr 2 7 1 t r 2 0 ) ra o i h t h iig e s u po i g i l cin e q o ma i pa rspr sonsdo notappl t pl i ifa t tt c ti notr quie t pe mi pl n ifa upe i ovii y o antf nd ha he our s e r d o r t aitf n Jones v. Kroger Stores et al Doc. 2 opporuniyt pa t flng f a trr ogni ngpli tf i i lgi et pr ee L f m a t t o y he i ee fe ec zi a n if s nei bl o oc d q or pa rs . upei) EN TER : Thi s da ofOc obe ,201 y t r 5. / /- 4 V f.W V-? + C? U nie St t s D it i tJ t d a e s rc udge Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.