Jones v. Sheriff et al, No. 7:2015cv00534 - Document 2 (W.D. Va. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 10/9/2015. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Q CL S OFFI U. DI .COUU ERK' CE S. ST AT ROANOKE, VA FI LED I TH E UN I N TED STA TES D I STR I T C O UR T C FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI NI CT RGI A ROANOKE DI SION VI 2CT 29 2 1 25 JULI . ' A BY; O W AI AN M . I JONES, Pl ntf , ai if C i lA cton N o.7: : 00534 vi i 15- v- V. , RK C M EM OM NDUM OPI ON NI ROANOKE CI SHERI eta . TY FF, l, By: D efendant s. H on.M ihae F.Ur c l bansd l U nied St e Di t i tJudge t at s s r c O w a i n M .J ne ,a V igi ai a e pr ee ng pr K ,c m e d t sci la on ia o s r ni nm t oc di o om nce hi vi di p ru n t 4 U. C. 1 8 .Up nar ve o c u te o d ,t p asta Plitf h da la t u s a t o 2 S. j 9 3 o e iw f o r r c r s ia pe r h t an if a te s t e non- be cvi aci nsora a sdim is asfi ous a ma ii , f f ii t sae hr e ha as i l to ppe l s s ed rvol , s lc ous or or a lng o t t a c am bef r hec me e t sa ton. See e. ,J sv.Unie St t ofAme ia No.7:4li o e om nc d hi ci s c. one td aes rc , 1 c - 0 0 si o a 2 3( . Va Aug 6 20 4 , p a ds s e g fio o , .1 - 8 , lp v 0 41 , l p. t - W D. . . , 1 ) a pe l imis d . rv lus No 4 71 8 si p x o a 2( t Ci. c 1 , 01 ) J n sv. ie S ae DititCo r f r h W e tl Ditit f p. t 4h r De . 6 2 4 ; o e Untd tts src u t o t e se' src o n Vici a, 7:4-vr ni No. 1 c 00499,si op. t2( . Va Se t 30,201 ;seas M c a v. td lp a W D. . p . 4) e lo Le n Unie S ae , 6 F.d 3 1 3 9( t Ci. 0 9 ( imis l wi u p eudc f rfi lu n s s o l tts 5 6 3 9 , 9 4h r 2 0 ) d s sas t t rj ie o rvoo s e s h ud ho no b e e e fo 28U. C. 1 5 g ) Ia mu ha ter c r p o ie n r a o t e e t e x mptd r m S. j 91 ( ). n s c s h e o d r vd s o e s n o x mpt Plitf fo 2 U. C. 1 5g ,h c u t imis sti a to wi o t rj d c f rPlitf s an if r m 8 S. j 91 ( ) te o r d s se h s ci n t u p eu ie o anif h f ilr t pa t flng f e whe flngt c alze o y he ii e n i he ompli t Se e. , a n . e. :.Dupr ev. l r 28 F. 1 e Pa me , 4 3d 234, 1 3 ( 1h Ci. 0 2 (e s nngt thefln fei d eu o fl g acv l cinwh nL f r 2 7 1 t r 2 0 ) ra o i ha t ii g e s u p n ii n ii a to e q o ma pa i pr vii do nota y t pli tf a t tt c ti no r quie t pe mi pli ifa upers o sons ppl o a n if nd ha he our s t e r d o r t antf n Jones v. Sheriff et al Doc. 2 opporuniyt pa t tlngfeafe rcog zngpli ifi i ii et pr e dL f ma t t o y he ii e tr e nii antf s nelgbl o oc e q or pa i) upers. Ex TsR : 'hi r s 5' d yo oco e, 2015. a t tb r f f* 4 + /. F-: ? /' U nie St t sD i t i tJ t d a e sr c udge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
