Cooper vs. Barksdale, et al, No. 7:2015cv00522 - Document 26 (W.D. Va. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 11/24/2015. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
tz.,/<. '. ' 1k 47. .. ' I TI E UM TED STATES DI N I STRI COURT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRICT OF W RGI A NI R O A NO K E DI SI N W O . I SRAEL RAY COOPER , N CASE NO .7: 15CV00522 N2v 2ù 2 1 25 JULA C. I BY: D ,JLERK ' W CL ERK Pl i if a ntf, M EM OR ANDUM OPI ON NI V. W ARDEN E. BARKSDALE, & c By: Gln E. nr d e Co a Chi fUnied St e Dit i tJudge e t at s s r c Dee f ndant . Ir e Ray Coope ,a Vigi a i t pr ee ng pr K ,ha fld hi ffh lte / i sa l r r ni nma e oc di o s ie s it e trmoton, whih te c u tc nsnlsa s e i s me u s cfe fnn o itro u o y ijmci r le. c h o r o t e s e kng o n pe iid o f n elc t r nt t eif ve By opi on a or r en e ed Nove r 1 2015,t c tde e Coope ' frt f l s h ni nd de t r mbe 7, he our nid rs is otr uc m o i ns Thi ffh moton mus alobede e to . s it i t s ni d. The i t nt l te/ o i i daed Nove r 1 201 a a lges t t oda 't nsa e trm ton s t mbe 9, 5, nd le hat t y' wo t olc r v r al th e tnld h s sft' a trw s me te a pa r' i t tah a d fies eb ly û rae e i) aey' nd l e o t g l pes' n he r s n t z l t e tne a he i ae t G e ve i aone or bec hr ae d not r nm t o G a t l l ome a vi tm t ' Coope sa e t t he c i oo.' r tt s ha i ntse t e of er i apr vi s ison a de e nt he i e t a t t slws t de i d hes fc s n e ous ubm s i s f nda s nt nds o dd o hi a ui. Cooper a s a lges t tli c ms l has s r e pa r k r c me ng t t hi s curt lo le ha ls ot eor e v d pe wor e om ndi ha s e iy l ve be i r a e whih wo ld r s ti li r m ova fo pr e tve c t and hi ta f rt e l nc e s d, c tl e ul n ls e l r m ot c i usody s r nse o l ng-e m s e ton. Coo raleg t tGhe a e sa tng f brc t c r es ...t s t n o t r egr ga i pe l es ha t y r tri a ia ed ha g t o usai t s' a st a i c nge. hi'cls ik ton ha Cooper vs. Barksdale, et al Th pa t se n aprlmi r ijmcin mu tma ace rs o ng Gha h i lk l e ry e kig ei nay nt to s ke la h wi i t e s iey t Doc. 26 t s c d on t m e is t thei lkey t s f rir pa a ehn m i t a e ofpr i i r o uc ee he rt, ha s i l o ufe re r bl r n he bs nce elm na y r le,t a t baa c o e ui e tp i h s fv r a d ta a ijmcin i i t p b i eif h t he ln e f q t s is n i a o ; n h t n nt to s n he u lc i Dockets.Justia.com itrs. W itr Na a Re . f Cou cl l c, 5 U. 7 2 ( 0 0 .Co p rfist ma n eet' n e v. mrl s De . ' i. n .5 5 S. , 0 2 0 ' n o e al o ke t ef l s hes otr howi . ngs Fis,hi a lga i ' not s s a lkei rt s le tons do ugge t ny i lhood t t t al ge ve ba t e t a ha he le d r l hr a s nd c a sfc ton c nge wilr ul i H e r bl ha m. l ed,Coo r doe no a lge ha ng l s i a i ha s l es t n pa a e r nde pe s t le vi r ied hi co e s wih a prs ofi a t ough t prs s gre as s nc m t ny ion fcil hr he ion' ivanc pr e le , a e oc dtr s s rq ie b f r h c n pu s e ac u t cin. S e4 U. C.j1 9 ea . W h n hed e 'o h e u rd eo e e a ru o r a to e 2 S. 9 7 () e o 'i e s ma o ti a ssa et a i a ypoe ta hnm,a du tl ec mpl swih j1 9 () h ha y ban sitnc o vod n tnil r n ni h o i t 9 7ea, e s e no lkei i lhood of s c s o a c t cai r ie i t s m o i uc es n ny our l m a s d n hi ton. Acc di l t c t or ng y, he our co l ncudest he i note tted t t e r or na y i e l u or r le he s ks a wilde hat s n il o he xta di r nt roc t y e if ee nd l ny hi m o i n.An a oprae o derwile e t sda s to ppr i t r l nt r hi y. The ce k i die e t s nd c e of tls m e o a l o ni a a ompa ng lr s r ctd o e opi s li m r ndlm pi on nd cc nyi or rt pl ntf. de o ai if ENTER:Thi @4 Nday ofN ovem ber 2015. s , . Chi fUnie Stt sDititJ e t d a e src udge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
