LordMaster v. Barksdale et al, No. 7:2015cv00509 - Document 41 (W.D. Va. 2016)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 9/13/2016. (slt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
. .. .' 4 - - - cë . ... b e ..p *e' '* : .* % ATRG NOKE, VA FI LED S 13 2 1 EP 06 I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI CO URT CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF W R GI A CT NI ROANOKE DI SI VI ON FR ANK I JA: LORDM ASTER, E Pl ntf ai if, V. E.BA RK SDA LE,e al, t . D efendant s. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JU DY: . EX CLERK ' CLE K Ci lA c i N o.7: 5- vvi t on 1 c 00509 M EM OM NDUM OPI ON NI By: H on.M i hae F. rba ki c l U ns Uni e St t sD i t i tJudge t d a e sr c r i a nma e oc di o Fr nki J eLor a t rlavig ni i t pr ee ngpr x , comm e edt sci l a e a dm se , nc hi vi a to p s n t 4 U. C. 1 8 i S p e e 2 5a dd dn t e a t efl f e Und r ci n urua t o 2 S. j 9 3 n e tmb r 01 n i o prp y h ii e . e ng ce t n cr um sa es aprs rmaybrng aci la ton wihoutf l pr yi t flng f . rai ic tnc , ione i vi c i t uly epa ng he ii ee 28U. C.j1 5 a( ) ( ) Ho v r 28U. C.j1 5 g p o ie :$nnoe e ts l a S. 91 ()2 , b . we e, S. 91 ( ) r vd s $ 1 v n hal p io rb igacv l cinp o e dngg t o t rpa me to t eiln fe . .ft p io r rs ne rn ii a to r c e i wi u p e y n f h i g e ) . i he rs ne h has on 3orm or pro oc asons whiei a c r t ordea ne i any f ciiy,br , e i r c i , l nc r e aed ti d n a lt oughta a ton n ci ora a .,.t twa dim is d on t g o ppe l ha s s s e he r undst ti i fi ous m a ii us orf l t sa e a ha t s rvol , lc o , ais o tt cl i upon w hi h r le m a be g a e unl s t prs ri unde i m i ntda r ofs r ous am c ei f y r nt d, e s he i one s r m ne nge ei p ysc lijly. 2 U. . . 1 1 ()2 Toflwihnt Gmmi n d n e'e c p in,he h ia nt ' 8 SC j 9 5 g . r ' al t i he l ne t a g r' x e to t i p io rsij r ç s b i n n o o c ri a t t t c mp an i fld. Cipa ln rs ne' nu y t t e mmie t r c u rng the i he o lit s ie ' a aii mu me ' v. an , 5 F.d3 , 30( t Ci. 0 3 (ii Ab u- a o dv Nah n 91F.d 1 2 (t S ii 3 2 3 28 3 7h r 2 0 ) ctng d lW d o . ta , 3 0 3 7h Ci.1 9 ).Ale ai n o ç nyap s ij r t a ha n trc r e 'a ei u fce t 1 . r 9 6 ) lg to s fs l a t nu y h t s o e u r d' r ns fiin . d o Pl i ifha atl a ttz e non- bea c vi a i ora a s di m i s a f i ous a a ntf d e s lr e ha s i l ctons ppe l s s ed s rvol , s m a ii us orf f lngt sa ea cai be o eheco me e t sa ton. Se e:. Lor lc o , or aii o tt l m f r m nc d hi c i e. . , dmase tr LordMaster v. Barksdale et al Doc. 41 v. v s No. :5 v 9( D. . a 1 , 01 )( imis dfrf iigt saeacam) Da i, 1 1 c 31 E. Va M y 5 2 5 d s se o aln o tt li ; Lo d se v Ep s No 11 c 3 ( D. . a 1 , 01 )(imis df rf ingt saea r ma tr . p , . :4 v1 51 E. Va M y 9 2 5 d s s e o al o tt i 1Eor se wasf meryknownasJ o Robe tGol de . dma tr or l as n r da r 2S cin 1 5g , fe rfre t a teShe srk s' o iinssp r o t P io LiiainReo e t 91 () o tn eer d o s h t re tie 'prvso i at fhe rs n tg to fnn o t Ac o 1 9 Pu . No.14 l 4 1 0Sa.l 217 (9 6 .Mc a v UntdSae , 6 F.d3 , 9 (t Ci. t f 9 6, b L. 0 - 3 , 1 tt 3 - 1 1 8 ) Le n . i tts 5 6 3 91 3 3 4h r e 2 9. 00 ) ' Dockets.Justia.com cam) Lo d se v. use 1 SaePrs n No 11 -v 5 7 ( D. . a 1 , 1 ) li ; r ma tr S s x 1 tt io , . :4 c - 0 E. Va M y 1 20 5 (imis df rfiigt saeacam) God d rv. o d o , 7:2 v5 ( . Va De . 2, d s s e o al o tt li ; la e W o s n No. 1 c 05 W D. . c 2 n 201 )(imis dwi o tp eudc a fioo s; e as Coe nv To lfo 2 d s se t u rj ie s rv lu ) s e lo lma . le s n, U. ,1 5 h S. 3 S. .1 5 ,1 6 ( 01 )( od n aG ti 'd s sa i c u tdrg r e st t t n o a Ct 7 9 7 5 2 5 h li g ç rke' imis l s o n e e adls o he i g f s mi s b e u n a pe l; c a , 6 F.da 3 9( imis l wih u p eu ief rfio o s e s u s q e t p a) M Le n 5 6 3 t 9 d s sas t o t rj d c o rv l u n s s o l no b e e tdfo 28U. C. 1 5 g ) F rhemo e t ec mp an d e no alg h u d t e x mp e r m S. j 91 (). u t r r ,h o lit o s t le e t a Plitf i t e a yi ne ttr a o s ro p y ia ij ywi i t eme n n o 2 h t an if s md r n mmi n h e t f eius h sc lnur t n h a i g f 8 h U. C. 1 5 g .l se d tec mp an c n ensa c s t g iv n e a df r a dalg to S. j 91 ( ) n t a ,h o lit o c r c e s o re a c s n o ms n l ains e o pa tus soff c a c tonsofc i me .Ac or ng y, he c t s is st aci n f s e or e nd ondii onfne nt c di l t our dim s e he to wih u p eu ieb c u ePlitf ddn t a t etl gf ewhe h fldt c mplit Se s t o t rj d c e a s an if i o p y h ii e n n e ie he o an . e ec; p e v. l r 28 F.d 1 3 ,1 3 ( 1h Ci. 0 2 . ..Du r e Pame , 4 3 2 4 2 7 1 t r 2 0 ) E TE Ti /M dyoSpe e,06 N R: hs a fetmbr21. J y/' 4 . Unied St t sDititJ t a e src udge 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
