Austin v. Schilling et al, No. 7:2015cv00503 - Document 13 (W.D. Va. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 11/30/2015. (slt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
rL SOFFI U.B. sI O URT ERK' CE D1 AT ROANOKE,VA RLED I THE UNI S N TED TATESDI TRI COURT S CT FOR TH E W ESTERN DI STRI O F VI CT RGI A NI ROANOKE DI I ON V SI JA M ES C.A USTIN , Pl ntf , ai if V. FREDERI SCHI NG,e al, CK LLI t . D ee f ndant . s dûV 39 2 1 25 zuLA D L c l EX . eY: ) Ci lAci No.7: c 00503 vi ton 15-v) ) ) M EM ORANDUM OPI ON NI ) ) By: Hon.M ihae F.Urbansk c l li ) Unie St tsDititJ e td a e src udg J mesC. tn, Vigi ai m a epr e di pr K ,fl d ac a Ausi a r ni n t oc e ng o ie ompli purua tt 42 ant s n o U. C.j1983, ngva i c rci la me c safofVigi aDe rme of S. nami rous ore tona nd dial tf r ni pa t nt Core tonsf ciii asde e n s Pl i ifge al al ge t tde e nt f ie t r c i a ltes f nda t . antf ner ly le s ha f nda s al d o a ua e y te thi medialc tonst tr s t fo f li down i i va i Vigi a deq t l r a s c ondii ha e uled r m alng nsde rous r ni prs i 1 a 2002.I ma ng t sge a alegai Pl ntf lssbuz r t co tuc ions n 979 nd n ki hi ner l l ton, ai if it zwo ds o nsr t hi c am s Fore mpl cai oner ds S e e nt vi a e Pl i ifsUnied St e s li . xa e, l m ea ,r f nda s olt d antf t ats Co siuin a n e rg t . . g t Ame d n n tob s b e tdt c e a du u u l n ttto me d d ihs . Eih h n me t o t e u j ce o nll n n s a Puni hm e . s nt' ' The c t us dimist co pli tf f ii t saea ca m upon whih r le m a be our m t s s he m a n or a lng o tt li c ei f y gr nt d. l Thec a e ompl i f ist pr s ças ta pl n sae e oft cli s wi t tt ant al o e ent 1 hor nd ai t tm nt he a m ho ng ha he pe d ri e tte t r le'a s fiin lfa t a alg to . .or iearg tt r l fa o e la e s n ild o eif' nd u fce tç lcu l le ains . t as ih o ei b v l e tes e uaielv l . . l At. m . . mb v 5 0U. 5 4 5 5( 0 7 (nena h p c ltv e e . .' l lCo v Two l , 5 S. 4 , 5 2 0 ) itr l . 'Be quottonmaksomitd) Pl ntf c r r yonmeelssofbuz wor ,lbes a ai r te . ai if amot el r it z ds a l, nd c l i t sa eacli . I Rahe , ne dst sa ei s ta pli t r wha ha ne onc usons o t t am d. t r he e o tt n hor nd a n e ms t ppe d Austin v. Schilling et al Doc. 13 ' I tr ni whehe aco antsaesaplusbl cam f r le i q co exts cik t k t tr quie Dee mi ng t r mpli tt a i e li or eif s t nt -pe t as ha e r s a t rve n c u tod a o is u iil x ein ea c mmo s n e' As cot lb l5 6U.. 6 , 7 -9 he e iwig o r t rw n tj dca e p re c nd o n e s, h r fv.g a, 5 S 6 2 6 87 ' (0 9 .Th s ac u t cenigac mplitu d rRue1 b()c nie type dn ta aen t nildt a 2 0 ) u , o r sre n o an n e l 2()6 a d ni la igs h t r o ç t e o n f t asmpino tuhb cuete cnit fn moeta lb ladcnlso .l.Alh u htecuti rl su to frt eas hy o sso o r hn aes n o cuins d to g h o rl al be y c tue pr j c mpans Han sv Ken r4 4U., 1 , 2 - 1(9 2,h c r d e n t c a a imae' ons r s o .q o lit, le . r e, 0 S 5 9 5 02 1 7 )te ou' o s o a t s n n t s t a dvocae s s ede opi fc sorsaut y a c tmtonalcamsnotce ry r s d i ac t, ua pont vel ng a t tt or nd onsi i li la l aie n ompli .Se ant e Br c v Car l l 7F3 2 , 4 (t Ci.1 9 )( tg J, o c ni g; a d tv. t o Ha tn 7 5F.d o k . rol 0 .d 4l 2 3 4h r 9 7 Lut , .c n u n )Be u et Civ f mpo , 7 2 , i ' 1 7 ,1 7 (t Ci.1 8 )s eas Go d nv Le k ,5 4F.d1 4 ,l 51(t Ci.1 78 (eo nzn t t dsrc 2 4 2 8 4h r 9 5; e lo r o . e e 7 2 1 7 1 4h r 9 ) rc g iig ha a itit c ti note cedt a s et r eofad t f aDr K plitf . our s xpe t o s um he ol vocae or o anit ) . Dockets.Justia.com N t hi t taleg y vi ae t Ei t Ame e . A c r i y, t c o m ha l edl ol td he gh h ndm nt2 co d ngl he ompli ti dimis d an s s se wi u p eu ief rf iigt saeacam u nwh c rle ma b g a td p ru n t 2 t t rj d c o aln o tt li po ih eif y e rn e , u s a t o 8 ho U .S. j 1 5 b ( )3 C. 91 A( )1 . sx -x l . Thi l t. s D d yo v mb r 2 a rxo e e, . Unie Stt sDititJ e t d a e src udg 2Plitf fldamoint a n foa dAmeia wi dsblyat(li b c ueh i p y ial anif i e t o me d ç d o t rc n t ia ii c cam) e a s e s h sc l h t y handia m e alil s a iltr t ' Them oto t am e i de e a f tl f r l ng ona lbe andco uson c p, nt lne s nd lie ae. ' in o nd s nid s u ie or eyi a l ncl i t stfrhacam.Se, . , o nv Da i, 71U..1 8 1 2( 9 2) o e ot li e eg.F ma . vs 3 S 7 , 8 16 . 3Thea i bl lmiai pe i f rt sa i i t yea s a Pli ifscai a a t ha a l pplca e i ttons rod o hi cton s wo r , nd antf ' l ms ppe r o ve ccued m or t t ye r bef ehefl t c e han wo a s or ied he ompli . ant 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
