Newman v. Wilson, No. 7:2015cv00482 - Document 13 (W.D. Va. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 11/30/2015. (slt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CL S OFFI U. . SX CDURT ERK' CE S DI AT ROANCKE, VA FI LED d2V S2 2 1 25 I TH E UNI N TED STATES DI STRI COURT CT FO R TH E W E STER N D I STR I O F V I G I I CT R N A R O A N O K E DI I O N V SI D EN N I L OY D N EW M AN , S Pl ntf , ai if V. W I AM W I LLI LSON, D ef endant . ) ) ) ) ) ) ) J AC ULI BY' = ,CL CLE Ci lA c i n N o.7: c 00482 vi t o 15- v- M EM O M ND UM O PI I N N O By: H on. ihae F.Ur M c l bansd l U nied St es Di tri Judge t at s ct De sLoyd Ne na aVigi ai t pr e ngpr K ,tl d a cvi a ton pur ua nni m n, r ni nma e oce di o ie i l ci s nt t 42U. C.j1 nn ngW iln W is .heSupei e nto t Ra hn k o S. 983, mi lim loh,t rntnde f he ppa nnoc Sh n n o hW ar nRe in l al(ta1) a tes l d fn a t P an ifc n l d sta e a d a re go a J i $ i', s h oe ee d n . litf o cu e h t J ' Supe i e ntW is w asdelbe a e y i f e e t hi chi d t h. Thi m a t ri be or rnt nde l on i r t l ndif r nt o s ppe 00t s te s f e t c u t o sr e i , u s a tt 2 U. C. 1 5 b () tr e iwi Plitf s he o r f r c e nng p ru n o 8 S. j 91 A( )1.Afe r ve ng an if s b sins tec u t imis st ec mplit t o t rj iefrfiigt saeacam u o u miso ,h o r d s s e h o an wih u p eudc o aln o tt li p n whc rle ma beg a té ih eif y rn e . Pl ntf c ppedhi t h whe hebi i o apott i t J i' ca ee i on M a 1 ai if hi s 00t n t nt a o n he als f tra y 0, 201 TheJ i doc o o de e t tt t t ber par d, Pl i ifwa ta f re t a he 5. a l t r r r d ha he 00 h e ie but antf s r ns e r d o not r J i (C RADC' t td yo d rngt en x d y.Afe arviga hi ne fclt Plitf al C NW ' ha a r u i h e t a ) tr ri n t s w a ii anif y, wr e alte t Su rnt nde W is as ng hi t c pe saf a adif r ntc r c i ot e tr o pe i e nt lon, ki m o om l t f t fe e ore tonal f iiy t fx hi t t b Su rntnde W is di notr po aclt o i s 00 h, ut pe i e nt lon d es nd. The c tm us di m i sa ac i n o cl i fl d by a i a e i t cour de e m i s t t our t s s n to r a m i e n nm t f he t t r ne ha Newman v. Wilson t a ton o cl i i f i ous o f l t s a e a c a m on whi h r le m a be gr nt d. Se 28 he c i r a m s rvol r ais o t t l i c e if y a e e Doc. 13 U. C.jj 1 1 e( ,1 1 b)1 ;42U. C.j 1 () Thefrtsa r i l scai S. 9 5()2) 9 5A( () S. 997ec . is tndad ncude l ms bas upon ça i s a y m e il s l lt or ' G a m sofi rnge e ofa l ga i e e t ed ç n ndiput bl rtes ega he y, ç i ' cl nf i m nt e l nt r s w hi h c ea l doe notexi t' o c a m s whe e t ç a t lco e i a e cl a l ba e es -' c l ry s s s r li ' r he ç c ua nt ntons r e r y s l s ' f Neizkev.W ila ,490U. 31 327( 989) Thes co sa r i t fmiirsa r f t lims S. 9, 1 . e nd tndad s he a la tndad or Dockets.Justia.com amoint d s s u e Fe ea Ru eo Cii P o e u e1 b () a c p i aplitf to o imis nd r d rl l f v l r c d r 2()6 , c e tng anifs f c ua alega i a t e.A c a t l l tons s nz ompli ne ds$ s t pli sae e oft cli s ant e 1 hor and an t tm nt he am howi a ng t a tepla e i e t ldt rle a ds fiin tta tzlalg to s. .oriearg t o h t h e d r s n ie o eif' n u fce t çl ct le ain . t as ih t t g a rle a t s ultvelve.... BelAt. n.v.Two y,550U. 544,555( eif bove he pec ai e l ' l lCor ' mbl S. 2007) (ne n l u tto makso te ) p an ifsb ssf rrle ç e ur smo et a lb l a d itr a q o ain r mitd .A litf a i o eif G q ie r h n a es n r c l i ns.... 1 The ef r ,apl i ifm us ç le f c ss fc e t sa ea1t elme s onc uso ' d. r o e ' antf t G lge a t uf i nt o t t 1 he e nt a ' s o gh qcam.1 Ba sv. .. upontdeN em our & Co., 3 4F.d7 , 6 ( t Ci. 0 3 . f te li ' s E l D 2 3 61 7 5 4h r 2 0 ) Pl i iff ist sa eacli ofdei r t i f e e e o as rousm e c lne d agans antf a l o t t am lbe ae ndif r nc f e i di a e i t Supe i ende W is a Supe it nde W is n camotbehel la em e e y be us hei rnt nt lon, nd rn e nt lo r d i bl r l ca e s t Supe i e he rnt nden oft Jal Se eg.M onel v. p' ofSoc.Se v . 436 U. 658 663 n. t he i. e. . , l De t r s, S. , 7 ( 9 8 .Deie aeidfe e c r q ie asaea t rt h veb e pes n l a r o fcs 1 7 ) l rt n ifr n e e ur s tt co o a e n ro al wae f a t b y i c tng as t nta rs ofs ro ha a t acormus ha a t l r cogniedt ndi a i ubsa i l ik e i us nn, nd he t t ve c ualy e z he e itn eo s c ars F nne v. e a , 1U.. 2 , 3 ( 9 4 .Plitf fist d s rb x se c f u h ik. a r Brmln 51 S 8 5 8 8 1 9 ) an if al o e cie how Supe i e ntW is wa pe s l i ve wih a de alofte t e ,de i r t l rntnde lon s ronaly nvol d t ni r a m nt lbe a ey i e f r d wih aprs doc orste t e , t cty au ho ied o wasde i r e y i fe e t nt re e t ion t ' r am nt or a il t rz r lbe atl ndif r nt o amedialpr de ' m ic c ovi rs s onduc a a c t t omplt l dif r ntc r c i lf ciiy. See e. ,M iter eey fe e ore tona a lt s c. li v. o n 8 6F. 8 8 8 4(t Ci. 9 0 .F rh r r , an iffist d s rb a y Be r , 9 2d 4 , 5 4 h r 1 9 ) u te mo e Plitf al o e ci e n s t n i lha m r s tng fo t dea i ha ng a c ppe t t ' paie Se eg. W e v. ubsa ta r e uli r m he ly n vi hi d 00 h r r d. e. . , bb e 1Dee ni whehe acompl ntsaesaplusbl cam f r le i ç co exts cii t k t tr quie tnni ng t r ai tt a i e li or eif s ç nt -pe fc as ha e r s a terve n c u tod a o is u iil x re c a dc mmo sns. As co v.q l5 6U. 6 2, 7 - 9 h e iwig o r t rw n tj dca e pein e n o n e e' h r A lba, 5 S. 6 6 87 ' (0 9 .Th s ac u t ce nn ac mplitu d rRue1 ()6 c nie tf pedig ta aen t nildt a 2 0 ) u , o r sre ig o an n e l 2b () a d niy la n s h t r o e tt o n e as s umpton oft t be us t y c itofnom or t n l l andco l i i nlh ca e he onss e ha abes ncusons.I Alho t c tlbe aly d. t ugh he our i r l c tue pr .i.o ans Han sv Kene, 0 U.. l , 2 - (9 2,h c u t o sn ta t sa imae' onsr s o .c mplit, ie . r r4 4 S 5 9 5 021 1 7 )te o r d e o c a n n t s ç a at,s s nt devel ngsaut y a c tt inalcamsnotcl ry r s i acompl nt SeeBr k v. dvoc e ua po e opi tt or nd onsiuto li ea l aied n ai . oc Car l 1 7F.d2 , 4 ( hCi.1 9 )( tg j, o c rig; a et . t o Ha tn 7 5F.d 1 7 , rol 0 3 41 2 3 4t r 9 7 Lut , .c n u rn ) Beud tv Civ f mpo , 7 2 2 4 , i 1 8(t Ci. 9 5, e as Go d nv Le k , 7 F.d1 4 ,1 51(t Ci.1 7 )(e o iigta adsrc 27 4h r 1 8 ) se lo r o , e e 5 4 2 1 7 1 4h r 9 8 rc r zn h t itit . c ti note ce t asum et r eofa our s xpe td o s he ol dvocaef aDr & panig. t or o q litf . 2 Ha d lh, 1F. p' 1 9 1 6(t Ci 2 0 ) Ac o dngy t ec mp an i ds s e miul 28 Ap x 5 , 6 4 h r 0 8 . c r i l,h o lit s imis d a wi o t rj d c f rfii t saeacam, u s a tt 2 U. C. 1 1 A( )1. t u p eu ie o al o tt li p ru n o 8 S. j 9 5 b ( ) h ng xxrsu: hs 50 dyo xo e e, 0 5 r rr T i a f vmbr2 1 . U nie St t s Di t i tJ t d a e s rc udge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
