LordMaster v. Moore et al, No. 7:2015cv00476 - Document 8 (W.D. Va. 2015)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 10/9/2015. (tvt)

Download PDF
% nlPRKS OFFI U,. SI rnlc CE S DI - ) ATR - NOK,Y . OA E)h tlr( ;!.. ,,) à I THE INI su TksDl Tm c' COURT N J TED s r Fo R TH E w E STER N D l rm c' o F VI G I A sr r R NI RoAxoxE Dl l oN v sl FR ANK I Ju LO R D M A STER , E Pl nt f , ai i f V. M R .M O O R E, 1 ,e J/ 11 t , Deendants. f t) 0: 2! 2'b T 2 1 JULl w.R 7 / ' 'L BY; C i lA cton N o.7: 5- vvi i 1 c 0047 6 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) M EM O M N DU M O PI O N NI By: M i hae F.U ra c l nbans d l U ni St esD i ri Judge ted at st ct Fr nki J e Lo dM as e ,pr e ng pr K ,fl d a c vi rgh sc pl i ,ptr ua t 42 a e a r t r oc edi o ie i l i t om a nt ls nt o . U. C. 1 8 .By Or e e tr dSe tmb r3 2 1 ,hec u t ie tdpanift s b twihn S. j 9 3 d r ne e p e e , 0 5 t o r dr ce litf o u mi ti 1 da fom t da eoft Or a i ae a co f 0 ys r he t he der n nm t c unt onn, nd ac rii d c ofpl ntf s a e tfe opy ai if tus f a co mtsa e ntf t sxr t' und c t t t me or he i mont pe i i e ael pr c ng t flng oft h rod mm dit y e edi he ii he compl nt obt i fom t a opra eprs ofi i ofe chprs a whi hpli tf i or ai , aned r he ppr it ion fcal a ion t c a n if s wa c i d durngt tsx- ont pe i On Oc o r1 201 pl n ifs itd ar pons s onfne i ha i m h rod. t be , 5, aitf ubm te es e t t or re ee Se e r3, o he de ntr d ptmbe 2015.( . 7) Plitf pr de ablnkPrs rTr s DktNo. . anif ovi d n ione ut Acc mtRe r a not d on i t ther cevedt co tsor o Se e be 8 201 a t ot po q nd e t ha e i he ur' der n pt m r , 5 nd he de dlnewa Se e be 13, a i s ptm r 2015t s i t r quie f m a i or ton. ai ifas o ubm t he e r d or nd nf ma i Pl ntf lo no e on t f m t G e a tc d or ra /3'Pl i ifi l d page2 oft Or rd e td he or o û e ta he de t / ' antf ncude s he de atd Se e be 3,201 whe epli ifciced t pa a a 3 oft or rwhih d r c e t t s pt m r 5 r antf r l he r gr ph he de c ie t d he nzt a co mtofk e a pli tf spl eofi a ce a i t te tt or ra a i t u ton t pr de c t t r t a n if ac nc r r ton o r a he de s n nsr c i o ovi t pl i ifwih addii lpho oc ngs r i el nst t e e ne es a yt pr de he antf t lona t opyi e v c oa o he xtnt c s r o ovi LordMaster v. Moore et al Doc. 8 certf ed copi oft r ii es he eques ed t us accounts at ent t r t t em s. Pli ifsa s pr de aco oft Ofe rTnztDal Rec i ton whih hem ot antf lo ovi d py he f nde s iy ep c e I m s l rr us st a w e num e ous r ques s & Fi ca Te h r us ' pr vi 1 fl s. . . . i cot e o ef e o ns r r e t s l c ef est o de FP ie o Bete d n eI P. Plitf sg e a d tdt i p g u e pe at q p ru y Fnal s vie c F ' an if in d nd ae h s a e nd r n ly f ej r . i l ' y, Pli ifpr de t Ofe rRe tf r sg d by t Tr s Ac untOfi e sa i 1 wil antf ovi d he f nde ques o m ine he u t co fc r ttng ç l I Dockets.Justia.com C ha co e r ady whe 1r c i t moneywihdr wa sg d by you & yotrco e o . e s ve pi s e n e e ve he t a l i ne l uns l r Pl a e s ehi hlght yo mus con a tt ot ri tt i & r ceveyourc pi ' Pl i ifwa e g i ed, u t t c he he nsiutons e i o es' antf s a v sdt t fi r t c mpywo l r s l i d s sa o ti a to wih u p eu ie d ie ha a al e o o l u d eut n imis l f h s cin t o t rj dc . u The c ndii ly fl d or rda e Se e be 3,201 diec st pli ift ç e u' t o tona l ie de t d ptm r 5 r t he antf o s t t o r n t c ta i t ac ountf r ,a ace tse co öfpli ifst s f a ountsa e e t he our n nma e c o m nd ri d py antf nzt und cc tt m n f t sxor he i mont pe i i e ael pr ce ng t flng oft co pl nt obt i fom t h rod mm dit y e di he ii he m ai , aned r he appr i t pr s om c alo e h pr s atw hi h pl ntf i orw a co opr a e i on i f ac i on c ai if s s nnned dur ne t t i ha sx- ont pe od-'Pli ifhasnotpr de apr ry c i m h ri ' antf ovi d ope l ompl t i t a co sae e eed nma e c unt t tm nt fom hi pr s tpl eofi a ce a i orfom t t s ac ountofi e fom t i tt i r s e en ac nc r r ton r he nzt c fc r r he nsiutons whe ePl n ifw a hous d i t sx m on hsprort tlng s t r aitf s e n he i t i o si ui. M or t n 1 da ha ea e ardpli ifhasf l t c e ha 0 ys ve lps d, l antf aied o ompl wih t de c i d y t he s rbe c ndto .Ac o dn l t ec u t imis st ea to wih u p eu iea dsrke t ec s o i ns c r igy,h o r ds se h cin t o t rj dc n ti s h a e i fom t aci doc toft c t Pl ntf m a r sl t cli si as pa a eaci n o e r he tve ke he our. ai if y e e he am n e r t to nc pl i ifi pr pa e t c antf s e r d o ompl wih t no e c to . y t he t d ondii ns TheCl r i diecedt s nd ac oft sM e or ndum Opi on a a ompa ng ek s r t o e opy hi m a ni nd cc nyi Or rt pli if de o antf EN TER : Thi s # dyo- obr2015. a f e oc , . 5 /* 4 J /. *-V* ' U nie St t sD i t i tJ t d a e sr c udge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.