Pendleton v. Stanley et al, No. 7:2015cv00405 - Document 7 (W.D. Va. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 8/24/2015. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
rdERK:OFFI U CE ATROA .S. sm COURT Dl NQKE A Fl ,k L t0 è I THE UNI S N TED TATESDI CT COURT STRI FO R TH E W ESTER N DI RI O F V I G I I ST CT R N A R O A N O K E D I SI N W O /% 25 2 5 9, J u n. BK ' '- u , ER * ' CL L C AR R O LL PEN D LETO N , Pl ntf ai if, V. M EM O R AN D UM O PIN IO N D O U G STAN LEY ,e a . t I, D efendant s. By: C# E C i lAc i N o.7: 5- vvi t on 1 c 00405 H on.M ihae F.Ur ns c l ba ki U nie St e D i t c Judge t d at s s ri t Ca r lPe l t n,a Vi gi a i a e pr ce di pr K , ied a c pl i plr ua tt 42 r ol nd e o r ni nm t o e ng o f l om a nt zs n o . U. C.j 1 S. 983.Pli ifnn svai pe eaflae wiht Ra ha k- na hantf me rous opl fiitd t he ppa nnoc she ndoa W arnRe in l al(J i' a d fnd ns S ci n 1 8 rq ie as o n o p ro a fut re go a J i $ a1) s ee a t. e to 9 3 e ur s h wig f e s n l a l t ' o t pa tofa def nda e t rba e on t de e n he r e nt ihe s d he f ndan ' pe s na cond tora t r s c ts r o l uc no he ' onduc t i e cu i n oft de e nt spolc e o c t s Fi herv.W as ngt M eto. r a Tr nst n xe t o he f nda ' i i s r us om . s hi on r A e a i Auho .6 0F.d 1 3 1 4 - (t Ci. 98 ) a r ae o ohe a o n shyCn y o t r, 9 2 1 3, 1 2 43 4h r 1 2 , b oc td n t r r u d . t . f . Rie sd v. La h i, 0 U. 4 ( 9 1 .Alh u hPlitf i d saise wi t v rie Mc ug ln 5 0 S. 4 1 9 ) t o g anif s is ts d t he h c tonsofc i m e a t J i,Pli ifdoesnotde c i ml pe s na ac oromi so by ondii onfne nt t he al antf s rbe y r o l t sin a yd fnd n .Ac o dn l t ec u t imis stec mpan wih u p eu ie p ls a t o2 n ee a t c r igy,h o r ds se h o lit t o t rj dc , t u n t 8 r U .S. j1 5 b ( ) f rfiigt saeacam u o whc rle ma beg a td l C. 91 A( )1, o al o tt li p n ih eif y rn e . n ENTER: iF- a o Au ut2 1. Ths 1 y f g s, 0 5 / /* 4 V @ W V -S ' + ZUnied St t D i ti tJ t t a es s r c tdge Pendleton v. Stanley et al ' Doc. 7 1Dee m i ngw hehe ac tr ni t r ompli sae aplusbl cl m f r ifi < co exts ci t s t tr quies ant tts a i e ai or ele s t nt -pe t a k ha e r a k terve ngc utoda o i j diil x re ea dc mmo s ne' As co v.g a. 5 U.. 6 , 7 -9 h e iwi o r t rw n t u ca e peinc n o n e s. h r A I b l5 6 S 6 2 6 87 s ' (0 9 .Th s ac u t ce nngac lit n rRue1 ()6 c nie tf pe dn st t r n t nildt a 2 0 ) u , o r sre i ompan u de l 2b () a d niy la ig ha ae o e tte o n as s umpton oftu hbec et y conss o no mor t n lbesandconcuso .I Alhought c tlbe al i rt aus he it f e ha a l l ins d. t he our i r ly c n t e p o. c mpans Han sv. re, 0 U.. 1 , 2 - (9 2,h c u t o sn t c a a imaes o snls r K o lit, ie Ken r 4 4 S 5 9 5 021 1 7 )te o r d e o a t s n n t' a dvoc t s a s ede o ng f t orsaut y a c tt i lcam snotce ry r ie i ac ae, u nont velpi acs tt or nd onsiutona li la l as d n ompl nt Se ai . e Brc v Car l, 07F.d2 , 43(t Ci. 9 7 ( ti, .c n urng; a d tv. t o Ha tn, 7 F.d o k . rol1 3 41 2 4h r 1 9 ) Lut 1, o c ri ) Be u et Civ f mpo 7 5 2 g 1 7 ,1 7 (t Ci.1 8 ) seas God nv Lek , 7 F.d1 4 ,1 51(t Ci.1 7 )(e o nzn ta a 2 4 2 8 4h r 9 5 ; e lo ro . e e 5 4 2 1 7 1 4h r 9 8 rc g iig h t dititcour i no e td t asum et r eofa at f aDr .j. anif. src t s t xpece o s he ol dvoc e or o - plitf) ç Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
