Law v. Superintendent Russel et al, No. 7:2015cv00395 - Document 7 (W.D. Va. 2015)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 9/30/2015. (slt)

Download PDF

CLERK' OFFCE U,S, DI . S I ST COURI AT ROANOKE,VA FI LED I TH E UM TED STATES DI N STRICT COURT SEF 32 2 5 : FOR TH E W ESTER N D I RI O F W R G I I BY A UD , ST CT N A ZULI CL : ROANOKE DI SION W . DE TY TER RY BLM N E LA W , ) ) Pl ntf , ai if ) V. ) ) ) W ES TERN VA REGI ONAL J L, M w, AI c .) ) Dee f ndants. t) ) R CASE NO .7: 15CV00395 MkM ORANPIM om xl J ox By: H o G l n E .Conr n. e ad Chi fUnie St t sDit i tJudge e t d a e sr c Te r Bl ne La a Vigi a i ae pr ee ng pr K , sl t s ci l rg s aci n r y ai w, r ni nm t oc di o ed hi vi i ht to . p rua tt 4 U. C.j1 8 ,a an tte W e tr Vigna Re in lJ i (t ej i' i S lm, u s n o 2 S. 9 3 g is h sen r ii go a al th al) n ae t ' Vigi a mz is s rnt nda ,f alege y vi a i hi rght t a e s t c t Upon r ni , d t upe i e nt or l dl oltng s i o cc s he our. r vi w o t r o d, hecour c ude t tt co pl ntmus bedimi s d asm oot e e f he ec r t t oncl s ha he m ai t s se . La sae h sbeift a h h sn tb e g v n ce i fra la t8 d y o j i tmeh w tts i le h t e a o e n i e rdt o t e s 0 a s f al i e h sar a ys r e .l J ne2 5 h b g na kn f rhepfo j i o fcast b i gs melg l a le d e v d n u 01 , e e a s ig o l r m al fiil o rn o e a a ton t ge t s nt nc c e tpr e fxe Ox c r r e r d li t t 1 w lbr r buts i c i o t he e e e r di obl m d. e s ef re 'm o he a i a y, l ad te c u d n tgve hm lg la vie o hep hi fl o t a j 1 8 f r Th j i h sno h y o l o i i e a d c r l m il u 9 3 o m. e al a i tt i na a t ne a t 1 w lbr da ad s La t ts c d nott lhi wha ki of nsiuto l tor y, nd he a i a n vied w ha he oul el m t nd pe ii n t fl oras ithi wih l ga r s r h. La wasalo t a e t s hed e tm e on t tto o ie ss m t e l e ea c w s m bl o c ul i he j i' lg lr s ac c mp tro fnd a y n t hep hm us i. I h sj1 8 c mp an ,La als e a e e rh o ue r i n o e o l i e t n i 9 3 o lit w s st j i is l a d iss p rne d n a d fnd ns Asrle, akst i c u t o od rt ue he al tef n t u ei tn a t s ee a t. eif he s h s o r t r e he Law v. Superintendent Russel et al Doc. 7 j lt pr delga a ssa ef hi i purui hi s ntnc c e tcai ai o ovi e l sitnc or m n s ng s e e e r di l m. Th j ds ito o f d rlc u t i lmie t l ec s so c n r v ris U. Co s. r. e u dcin f e ea o rs s i td o i a e r o to ese . S. n t at v 11 j 1.I deveopme soc trd i t c ls ofaca ewhihrnde t c ttt bl t ga 1, f l nt cl urng he otre s c e r he otr ma e o rnt a paï t r le r quese t cli m us be dimis d as moot a i k v. Alec nv ty he e if e t d, he a ms t s se .Bl nc a l he Dockets.Justia.com Lu lm Co.7 F.d6 0, 9 - 9( dCi.1 9 ) eta fro rla eo ap io rg neal dl l , 7 3 9 6 8 9 3 r 9 6 .Th rnse r ee s f rs ne e rly rn es mo ta y cams f r ijmcie o d caao y r l f rltn t te f r rplc o e d r o n li o nt tv r e lrt r ei eaig o h o me a e f e c n i me t S e Co n y o Lo Al ls v.Da i,4 U. 6 5 6 ( 9 ) W il ms v. o fne n . e u t f s wee vs 40 S. 2 , 31 1 79 ; li n Grfi 9 2 F.d 8 0 8 3 ( t Ci.9 )( dn p io e ' ta frr n ee mo thi cams iln, 5 2 2 , 2 4h r1 91 fn ig rs n rs rnse e d r d o s li f r ij n tv a d d caao y r le M a e v.W aes 81 F.d 4 ,4 2 ( t C1.98 ) o n u cie n e lrtr eig; g e tr, 0 2 51 5 4h 1 7 ( od n t a ta se o aprs ne rn ee mo t i cam frijmci r le h li g h t rn fr f io r e d r d o h s li o nt tve eig. Th c u t a be n a vs dt a La i n lng ri c r eae a t ej i i S lm, r e o r h s e d ie h t w s o o e n ac rtd t h al n ae whee hi cli sedngasitnc i ûlnghi sntnc ce tcai Hi j1 3compl nts kso y s ams e l ssa e n i s e e e rdi l m. s 98 ai ee nl ij n t r le,dr cigj i ot ast p o iehm wi lg la ssa c . Be a s La i n n u ci eif ie tn al fkil o r vd i t e a sitn e c u e w s o ve h ln e i t e c t y o j i ofcas h we e ,t c u tc n o g a t te r le he s e s o g r n h usod f al fiil, o v r he o r n n t rn h eif e k . Ac o dngy hs cams a e mo t a d t c u twilds s t e wih u prj ie An c r i l, i li r o, n he o r l imis h m to t eudc . a opdae o de wilis t sda ppr t r r l s ue hi y. The Cl r i die t d t s nd c e o t s me o a l opi on a a co pa ng e k s r c e o e opi s f hi m r ndlm ni nd c m nyi or rt pli if de o antf. ENTER: Thi L & day ofSept mber 2015. s Ib e , Chi fUnied St t sDiti tJ e t a e src udge

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.