Hughes v. DCE et al, No. 7:2015cv00347 - Document 8 (W.D. Va. 2015)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 7/13/2015. (tvt)

Download PDF
Hughes v. DCE et al Doc. 8 nI PRr:OFFI U S Dlm O Ur CE s I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRICT COURT FO R TH E W ESTERN D I STR I O F VI G I I CT R N A R O AN O K E DIV ISIO N A N TO N I H U G H E S, O Pl ntf ai if, A RFKEDk< . T >N K 6 , ' J 13 2 1 UL 25 JUL BY: VR* ' , G8 Ci lA cton N o.7: c 00347 vi i 15- v- ' M EM O M ND U M O PIN IO N By: M i chaelF.U rbanski U nied St es Di t ctJudge t at s ri D C E,etal , Deendants. f t) A nt o Hug , oc edi pr K,iedacvirg sc oni hes pr e ng o fl i l iht ompl ntptrua t 42U. C.j ai , zs nt o S. . 1983.By Or re e ed J 25,201 t cour diece pli ift s i wihi 1 da fom de nt r une 5, he t r td antf o ubm t t n 0 ys r t da e oft Or r t n t t c ta i a e a ountf m ,a a c tfe c of he t he der e ur o he our n nm t cc or nd eri i d opy pli ifst s f a ountsae e f rt sx- o h pe i i medit l pr ce ngt tlng antf nlt und cc t tm nt o he i m nt rod m a ey e di he ii oft c he ompli ,obt ne fo t a o it prs ofi a ofea h prs a whih pl i ifi ant ai d r m he ppr pra e ion fcil c ion t c antf s orw a c i d dtrng t tsx- on h pe i On J y 9,201 pl ntf r t ned t t cou ta s ont ne li ha i m t r od. ul 5, ai i f e ur o he r n i t a coun r por whih wa net rfle o a orsgnedby t tus a c nma e c te t c s ihe ild ut nd/ i he r t c ountofie as fc r di e t d nordi t i a e a co tr por i l t r r d sx- o h s a e e s Pl i if rce d he nm t c un e t nc ude he equie i m nt t t m nt . a ntf wa a v s dt a afiu et c mp ywo l rs t nds sa o t sa to wih u p eu ie s d ie h t alr o o l u d euli imis l f hi cin t o t rj dc . M or t n 1 da ha e a ed,a pl ntf has f ie t c pl w ih t de c i e ha 0 ys ve l ps nd ai i f a l d o om y t he s rbed c tons Acc di y,t c r dimisst a tonwihoutprj cea srke t c e ondii . or ngl he ou t s se he ci t eudi nd ti s he as fo t ac i doc toft c t Pl i ifm a r tl t cli si as pa aeaci o e r m he tve ke he our. antf y eie he am n e r t ton nc pl i ifi pr pa e t c pl w ih t no e co to . a ntf s e r d o om y t he t d ndii ns The Cl r i diec ed t s nd a co oft s M e or ndum Opi on a a om pany ng ek s r t o e py hi m a ni nd cc i Or rt pl ntf. de o ai if y r ' i /3 x' r s sR: h dyo Jl, 0 5 a fuy 2 1. / J . '. ' p. &.4 . . U nied St esD i ti Judge t at sr ct Dockets.Justia.com

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.