Donohue v. Blanton et al, No. 7:2015cv00333 - Document 4 (W.D. Va. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 6/18/2015. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CLERK' OFFI U. DI rnur S CE S, SX AT ROANOKE, VA PI ED L JUN 12 2 1 25 JULA C JU I I THE UNI N TED STATES DI STRI CO URT :y. CT D FO R TH E W E STER N DI STR I T O F W R G I I C N A R O A N O K E D I SI N W O JO H N D O N O H UE , C A SE N O .7: 5C V00333 1 Pl ntf , ai if ' V. M EM O R AN D UM O PI I N N O m clAM s BLANTON C K , l . By: Gl n E.C onrad e C hi fU nie St e Di t i Judge e t d at s s r ct D ef endant s. J m Donohue,aVigi a i aepr e ng pr K ,Il d t scvi rght a ton ptr ua t ol r ni nm t oc edi o ie hi i l i s c i ls n . t 4 U. C.j1 8 ,cami g t a tej d e pr s c tr a d p b i d fnd riv l e i hs o 2 S. 9 3 li n h t h u g , o e uo , n u lc ee e n o v d n i c i na pr e uton ca e hi t bewr ul c ced by f ii t e rmi l os c i us d m o ongf ly onvi t alng o xhaus admi sr tve t nita i r m e e a wihhol ng e ul t r e denc Be us Donohueha notpr pai t r quiie e di s nd t di xc pa o y vi e. ca e s e d he e st flng fe,t c tasume f pur e oftlso ni t thei s e ngt pr e j f ma ii e he our s s or pos s li pi on ha s e ki o oce d . or q pa rs Upo r e oft r co d,hec tfndst tt aci mus be s m a iy dim is d upe i. n eviw he e r t our i ha he ton t um rl s s e wi u p eu ieba e o Do o u ' p ircvia to t t a b e ds se a fi oo s t t rj dc s d n n h es ro i l cins ha h ve e n imisd s rv lu . ho ThePrs n Lii ton Reonn Ac of1 s tntal s io tgai f t 995 ubsa ily mende t L f mapa rs d he q or upei saut 28 U. C.j 1 5. Thepur e oft Ac wast r uie a1prs r ltga ss ng tt e, S. 91 pos he t o eq r 1 ione ii nt ui gove n e e ttes o ofi i l t pay flng f esi f l et r tzough pr pa e o tzough r m nt n ii r fc as o ii e n ul, ihe lr e ym nt r lr i sal n s wiz l fo t l ia ts imae tu ta c t . j1 5 b . S cin 1 5 g n tl t thed r m he i g n ' n t r s c omt me l t 91 () e to 91 ( ) de e t i t lm e pa e m ehod t prs r who ha t l e srke ' - t e prs r ni s he nsal nt ym nt t o ione s ve iu'e ti s' hos ione s t Donohue v. Blanton et al Doc. 4 w ho ha ha t e pr vi c es ora a s di m i s d a f i l ,m a i i ,orf f itr t ve d hr e e ous as ppe l s s e s rvo ous lc ous or a lle o saeacam,l e stet e -ti e imaes wsGmmi e td n e o sro sp y ia ij y' tt li l s h hresrk r n t ho 'l n n a g r f ei u h sc l nur . nl i ' j1 5g. 91 () Dockets.Justia.com ' Dono hue ha br s ought s h a tons or a al on tze or m or pror occ sons Se uc c i ppe s lr e e i ai . e Do h v.Hikl,Ca e No 7 1 -v 0 38 ( . Va Ap i 2 ,201 ) (im ' a fi oo no ue n e s . :4 c - 01 W D. . rl 9 4 d s d s rv lus t e j1 5 B)1) Do o u v.S il Ca e No 7 1 -v 0 1 1 ( . Va Ap i 2 ,2 4 md r 91 A( ( ); n h e tl, s . :4 c - 0 5 W D. . rl 9 01 ) ( im' a fio o t e j1 5 ( ) afnne f rr a o ssae i t e dsrc c u tNo. ds d s rv lus md r 91 A@) 1, fi d o e s n ttd n h itit o r, 1 - 91 ,4h Ci. g 2 , 01 (; n hu v. li , viAci nNo 7:4 c 1 7( . Va 4 6 5 ( t r Au . 6 2 49 Do o e Co l Ci l to . 1 -v- 5 W D. . ns 2 4 ( im' a fioo t e j 91 A()1) c r i l, n h ma p o e dL f r 01 ) ds d s rv lus md r 1 5 b ().Ac o dngy Do o ue y r c e q o ma p u rs( t o t e a me to t efln fe o yi h s o t a hef c si n n d n e o a pei wi u prp y n f h iig e ) nl f e h ws h t a e mmi e t a g r f h s ro p ysc lij r rltd t lsc re tcams j 1 5 g . Do o u ' alg to f i t eius h ia nu y eae o l u rn li . 91 () n h e s le ains al o i s how t tt pa tc ha he s onduc o whih he co pli i t s aci n ha pl c hi i i mi nt t f c m a ns n hi to s a ed m n m ne da rofphys c lhn m . nge ia r Be a eter c r srle tt tDo h eh sa latt e çtie 't e j 1 5 g a d c us h e o d elc ha no u a t e s k e i rk s'md r 91 () n s ha notde onsr t d t thei i i ne tda rofphysc lha m,t co tdele Donohue s m ta e ha s n mmi n nge i a r he ur zi s t e o po tniy t p o e d L fr pa p rs a d d s se t e c mp an wih u p eu ie h p ru t o r c e q oma u ei n imis s h o lit t o t rj d c e de l s ue hi u e j 1 5 g . An ap r nd r 91 ( )1 p opdat or rwili s t sday . The Cl r i die t t s nd co e oft sm e or ndlm o ni n a a ompa ng e k s r ced o e pi s hi m a l pi o nd cc nyi o de t pl i if r r o a ntf . ENTER:Tl s l : d yo Jme 2015. z %4 a f t , i Chi Unie St t Diti tJ e ef t d aes src udg 1 M or ove , onoi e' c r tc1i sae l ly fi ous I e e hi c pl ntatm pt t ove tun e rD m s uren am r egal rvol . n ssnce, s om ai te s o rt' hi ci na co c i tloug mea ofaci la ton agans parii nt a til I i wele tbls d,howeve, s rmi l nviton lr h ns vi c i i t tcpa s t ra. t s l s ihe r ta çtt pio es( y ueo l hb a cru (rsmia sae rme iswh nte se t h ldt te ht tae rsnr ma) s ny aes op s o i lr tt) e de e hy ek o waiae h s dzain o terc nf me t'wheh rdr cl o Kn iety trug aj dca d tr n to t tn csaiy l to f h i o me n ' te ie t r d drcl h o h u iil eemlain ha e e srl r y i i istet a uneso t S aesc so y. W i n o v Dosn,5 4 U. 7 81( 05 .F rhemoe te mpl h mlwf l s f he tt ' ut d ' iis n . to 4 S. 4, 20 ) u t r r,h e ' c r d cie t c n tu Do o u ' sbmiso a ah b a c musp tint e 28U. C.j2 4 b cus i out e ln s o o sr e n h es u sin s a e s o eio md r t S. 25 , e a e t ofr n gru do whc t s g eth ts c apeiinc udbed e dt l t e 28U. C. 2 4 *. fes o o n n ih o u g s ta u h tt o l o eme i y md r me S. j 2 44 2
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
