Rivadeneira v. Department of Homeland Security et al, No. 7:2015cv00321 - Document 3 (W.D. Va. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 7/13/2015. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
Rivadeneira v. Department of Homeland Security et al Doc. 3 I TH E UN I N TED STA TES DI RI CO U R T ST CT FOR TH E W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI NI CT RGI A R O AN O K E DI I O N V SI DR.FELI GUZM AN RI X VADENEI ) RA, Pl ntf, ai if ) ) v. ) ) DEPARTM ENT OF HOM ELAND ) SECURI e Jl TY, t , ) De e f ndants. t) ) O por: oFFl u. . ST. URT ce s DI X AT R- QG , A V F p u J l3 2 1 UL 25 J ULA C. , D Ci lAc i No.7: 5- v- 1 vi ton 1 c 0œ DP L E t Rx . , . M EM O M N D UM O PI I N N O By: Mi chaelF.U rbanski Unied Stat D i ri Judge t es st ct D r Fe i Guzm a Ri de r pr e ng pr K ,fl a c vi r g sco pl nt pur ua . lx n va neia, oce di o ied i l i ht m ai , s nt t Bi nsv.Si Unknown Na e Ag t ofFed.Bur a ofNa c i .4Q3 U. 388 ( 71 .By o ve x m d en s eu r otcs S. 19 4 Or re e edJ 1 201 t co tdie t pli ift s i wihi 1 da fo t da e de nt r une 7, 5, he ur r c ed antf o ubm t t n 0 ys r m he t oft Or a s a e e ofas e s a i a e ac ountf he der t t m nt s t , n nm t c onn,a a ce tfe co ofpl i ifs nd rii d py a ntf t s fm d ac ot ts a em e f t sx- on h pe i i m e a e y pr e ng t f lng oft nz t t c m t t nt or he i m t r od m di t l ec di he ii he co pl n , a ne f om t a o i t pr s of i i ofe ch pr s a w hi h pl i ifi or m ai t obt i d r he ppr pra e i on f c al a ion t c a ntf s wa c i durng t tsx- on h pe i a wel asa exe ut d ve ii d sa e e t Pli if s onfned i ha i m t rod s l n c e rfe t t m n . antf wa a v sdt a afit et c mpywo l r s l i ds s a o ti a to wih u p eu ie s d ie h t alr o o l ud e ut n imis l f h s cin t o t rj dc . l M or t n 1 da ha ea ed,a pli ifha f ie t c e ha 0 ys ve lps nd a ntf s al d o ompl wih t de c i y t he s rbed c ndto .Ac o dn l t ec u t imis st ea to wih u p eu iea dsrk st ec s o iins c r igy,h o r ds se h cin t o t rj dc n tie h a e f om t a tve doc toft c r . Pl i tf m a r t l t c a m si a s pa a e a ton onc r he c i ke he ou t a n i f y e i e he l i n e r t c i e pl i ifi pr pa e t c pl w ih t not c tons a ntf s e r d o om y t he ed ondii . The Cl r i die t d t s nd a c oft sM e or ndum O pi o a a om pa ng ek s rce o e opy hi m a ni n nd cc nyi O r rt pl i if de o a ntf . E E Ti I NT R: hs S dyo Jl, k 5 a fuy2 ê' z . . >. ' f 4 . z. m. y ' U nie St t sD i ti tJ t d a e sr c udge Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
