Anderson v. Witherspoon et al, No. 7:2015cv00236 - Document 30 (W.D. Va. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 11/30/2015. (slt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
j ' a afe zAT CEU.. Dl COQRT OFFI s sX R yN E V O LED ,A OK rt 82k 32 2 1 25 I TH E UN I N TED STA TES D I STR I C O U R T CT W ESTER N D I STR I O F VI G I A CT R M ROANOKE DI I ON V SI W I A M LEE A N DER SO N ,I , LLI l Pl ntf ai if, V. PH I P H .W I ERSPOON,e al, LI TH t . D ef endant . s ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ' t'l ( 2)-k' I l/ ) J ; a .. ! 1* (f 9W ' .. . , ' ;) f' Ci lA c i N o.7: 5- v- 236 vi t on 1 c 00 M EM O R AN DU M O PI I N N O By: Hon.M i hae F. bans c l Ur ki Uni e St e D i t i Judge t d at s s r ct Thi m a t ri be o e t c tupon de e n D r Phii W ihe s n' m o i f s te s f r he our f nda t . lp t r poo s ton or sl r j d me ta p om p an ifW iln Le And ro I' moint n ndt e l mmay u g n nd r litf lim e es n,ls to o me h c mplit moinf ra e tnso o tmet rs o dt t moi nfrs mmayj g n , n o an , to o n xe i n f i o e p n o he to o u r ud me t a d m o i f dicove y.Fo t f l ng r as , hec tgr nt i pa ta de esi par t ton or s r r he olowi e ons t our a s n r nd ni n t he mo int n nd ds se Dr W i es o n' moin frs mmayj d me t t o tp eudc , to o me , imis s . t rp o s to o u r u g n wih u rj ie h de e Pli ifsmoton f a e e i oftmeasm oo ,die t Dr W ihe s ni s antf' i or n xt nson i t r c s . t r poon t fl ane o ie w moinf rs mmayj d me tha i ld sac p o o pa efo Plitf me ia r c r , to o u r u g n t tncu e o y f ne g r m an ifs d c l e o d a dimis swi o t rj d c Plitf smo infrds o ey nd s se t u p eu ie anif to o ic v r . h Fe a Rul o Cii Pr c dle 1 ()1 pe isap ryt a n 'spe dngo ea a der l e f v l o e t 5 a( ) nnt a t o me di la i nc s r t . m at rofc s wihi 21da ofs r ng t pladi orç ft pl a ng i o t whih a te our e t n ys e vi he e ng û he e di s ne o c i r ponsvepla ng i r quie 21da a t s rvc ofar s nsvepl di or21daysa tr es i e di s e r d, ys fer e ie e po i ea ng fe s r ieo amoi nu d rRu e1 ( , e, r( , ih v ri e rir' l ap ry se t a nd e vc f to n e l 2b) () o t wh c e e s ale. f a t e ks o me ) ' apladi i a1ot rc e ,i m a o y do s wih t opposng pary' wrte c e ort e ng n 1 he as s t y nl o t he i t s itn ons nt he Anderson v. Witherspoon et al c u tsla .Thec u t s as c n ie t emoes e i j i e p o so so Rue 1 () o r' e ve o r mu t lo o sd r h r p cfc ond r r viin f ls 9 a Doc. 30 a 20 a whe ap an ifflsamoi nt n n ta s e st j i a dto a d fn n s nd () n litf ie to o me d h t e k o on d iin l ee da t. Hi onv.No wes Fi S. .nc.239F. 611 61 ( h Ci.2001.Thepr e de e nt ns r t n. C.I , 3d , 8 4t r ) opos d f nda s m us ha a rghtt r le as e t a i tt m ,trsng outoft s m eta a ton,oc r nc t ve i o ei f s red gans he Ga ii he a r ns c i cure e, Dockets.Justia.com o sre o ta s cin o o c re e l 'a t ecàmsmu ts a es meG u sin o lw o r eis f rn a to s r c u rnc sy ' nd h li l s h r o t eto f a r q fc c mmo t'ald fn a t.F d. Ci. 20a ( ) Absn ba fih u d ep eu iet a t o n o' l ee d n s e R. v P. ()2 . e t d at , n u rj dc o t o p sn p ry, rf ii o n n me t la et n n u d rRul 1 ()s al efe l he p o ig a t o m lt f me d n ,e v o me d n e e 5a h lb r ey y gv n Se Fo nv. vi, 71U..1 8 1 2( 9 2 . ie . e ma Da s 3 S 7 , 8 16) Pli tf se su aef csrlv n t Dr W i e s o a dt j i ç na De m me t' anif e k pd t a t ee a t o . t rpo n n o o n s tl p h De n' teVignaDe a t n o Cor cin (VDOC', n T. y e , d n a a ssa t l i f tl h r ii p rme t f re to s ç ç ' a d Co n r a e tl sitn . t s ui ) e t j i T. y rb c u ePli tf fist alg a ype t e t a t a o t m, n ii as o on Co ne e a s anif al o l e n ri n f cs b u hi a d t s lo e n f tl t j i teS n a De me t' ndt eVDOC b c u en ih re tt i aG e s n'o uie o on h ç tl pM n 'a h De e a s et e n i s t ro 'f r y p pur e of42U. C.j1 3.Se e. ,W ilv.M ihia De tofStt Polc ,491U. 58, pos s S. 98 e. c. l c c n p' ae ie S. 70 ( 98 ) Ac od n l t moint a n i g a tda t teu ae fcsa o tDr 1 9 . c r i gy,he to o me d s rn e s o h pd td a t b u . W i e s o n b tii d n e t t ee tn i s e st j i ç e tl pa t n 'h VDOC, n t rp o , u t s e id o h x e tt e k o on r na De rme t'te h ad T. Coyne . r Be a s Dr W ih rpo n smoinf rs mmayj d me trltst t eo i ia c u e . t es o ' to o u r u g n eae o h rgn l c mpan ,hemo i'f rs mma yj d me ti ds se wih u p eu iea mo t a d o litt to o u r u g n s imis d to t rj d c s o, n n Plitf smoinf ra e tn ino tmet r s o dt t emo inf rs mmayj d me ti anif to o n x e so f i o e p n o h to o u r u g n s alo de ed a m oot Pur ua t St ndi Or r201 6,Dr W ihe s n wilfl a updae s ni s . s nt o a ng de 3. t rpoo l ie n td motonf s i or ummayj r udgme s po tdbyaf vit)wihi tzryda nt up re fda ts t n lit ys. Pl ntf ha as fld am o i f afeec ofapa i hi m e ca r or t t ai if s lo ie ton or r opy ge n s di l ec d ha alege y s l dl uppor shi c a m ,whi h t c ' c t ue asa m oton f d s ove y. D r t s li c he oul onsr s t i or i c r . W ihe s n s l pr dePl i ift r que t o - gedoc l e f o Pl i ifsmedia t r poo ha l ovi antf he e sed nepa lm nt ' m antf r cl fl,unl s a re nott bewihi Dr W ihe s ie e s ve r d o t n . t r poon' pos es i c t y,o c ntol by no s s son, us od r o r , ltrt a ted t Dr W i rpo nflsh sn w mo inf rs mmayj d me t Plitf' ae h n h ae . t s o ie i e he to o u r u g n . an ifs moin frds o eyi ds se wih u prj ie to o ic v r s imisd t o t eudc . 2 TheClr s ls nd a c oft sOr rt t pa te . e k hal e opy hi de o he ris ENTER:Ths Y@ d yo No e r2 5 i a f v mbe, 01 . Unie St t sDititJ t d a e src udge
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
