Mitchell v. Clear et al, No. 7:2015cv00221 - Document 27 (W.D. Va. 2015)
Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael F. Urbanski on 12/8/2015. (tvt)
Download PDF
<![CDATA[
CLERKSOFFf U. DI M Ur CE S. SI AT ROANOKE, VA rllD 'k5 ' DE2 22 2 1 25 I TH E UN I N TED STA TES D I STR I C O U R T CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF VI NI CT RGI A R O A N O K E D I I ON V SI JEREM Y LY N N M I CH ELL, T Pl ntif ai f ! V. STEV EN C LEA R ,e aI, t . D ef endant s. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) J , r. ' ' E ' L ULk . 't k; ' ' J- . E BY: D LE C i lA c i N o.7: 5- v- 221 vi ton 1 c 00 M EM O R AN DU M O PI I N ON By: H on.M i chaelF.U rbanski Uni e St e D i t i tJudge t d at s s r c J r my Ly M ic l,aVigi aprs rpr ee ngpr K ,fld a cvi rght aci n ee nn thel r ni ione oc di o ie i l i s to pzs a t o4 U. C. 1 8 , a n safo t Abig o Re ina J i a d fn a t.On l u n t 2 S. j 9 3 n mig tf f he n d n g o l al s ee d n s r Oct r21 201 de e obe , 5, f ndan sfl d amoton t dim is and ont ne da t Cl k i s d a t ie i o s s, he xt y, he er s ue Notc t ta s d Pl i ift tam o i t dim iswasfl d a t theha t nt o da ie ha dvie antf ha ton o s s ie nd ha d we y- ne ys fom t Notc t fl ar s e. TheNotcef t ra s d: r he ie o ie e pons i urhe dvie f a ntf s e po o f nd tslp e ngs he 1 Pli ifdoe notr s nd t De e an 'El ladi , t Cour w ilas lm e t t t l s l ha Pli tf ha l t i t r t i t c e,a or t t Pl i if a ee wih wha t a n if s os n e es n he as nd/ ha antf gr s t t he Dee d n sae i t i (i) rs nsv pla ig s. I Plitf wih s t fn a t tts n her sc epo i e e dn t) f an if s e o c i wih t ca e i i ne e s r t t Pl n if r pond i al a opra e ontnue t he s , t s c s a y ha aitf es n t ppr it f s on .... How e r i Pl i if doe notf l s e r s a hi ve s f a ntf s ie om e pons w ihi t t e ve t n he w nt o e( )d ypeidph Co r ma d s s tec s f rfit et pr s c t. n 21 a ro t e u t y imis h a e o alr o o e ue l No ie( n 2 )( rgn l mp a i) tc ECF o. 6 o ii a e h ss. Pl ntf di notr pond t t No i eort moto t dimi s a t N o i ewa no ai if d es o he tc he i n o s s , nd he tc s t r t ne t t co ta unde i r bl Puruan t t No i e e e on Oc o 22,201 t e ur d o he ur s lve a e. s t o he tce nt r d t ber 5, he c tfnds t tPl ntf hasf l t pr ec e t sc e Acc di l t com pl nti our i ha ai if aied o os ut hi as . or ng y, he ai s Mitchell v. Clear et al ds se wih u p eu ief rPlitf fiu et p o e u e p ru n t Fe . Ci P. ( ) imisd t o t rj dc o an ips alr o r s c t, u s a t o d R. v. 41b , Doc. 27 a alpe ngmotonsaedeni wihoutprj c a moot Se Lil v. a hR. Co. nd 1 ndi i r ed t eudie s . e rk W bas R. , 370U. 6 630- ( 2)Cç- a t iyofac todimiss s efrlc of S. 26, 31 196 -he uhort l our t s s ua pont o a k 'Theco tnotst tal de e nt fl t m o i t dim is. ur e ha l f nda s ied he ton o s s Dockets.Justia.com pr e uton ha ge r ly be n cons de e an tnhe e pow e , ...ne s a iy ves e i c t os c i s ne a l e i rd i r nt r' ce s r l t d n our s t ma a et ero a fiss a t a hiv t eo d rya de pe iiu ds sto o c s s'. o n g h i wn far o s o c e e h r e l n x dto s ipo iin f a e .) ' EN TER :Thi s day ofDec m be ,201 e r 5. f f* 4 ,J /. > A Unied St t Diti tJ t aes src udge '
]]>
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You
should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
