Rountree v. Clarke et al, No. 7:2015cv00220 - Document 64 (W.D. Va. 2017)

Court Description: MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Chief United States District Judge Glen E. Conrad on 4/28/2017. (tvt)
Download PDF
RlFRK S OFFI U. DI CE S. SX plF'.'OKE, s- i '' - . .l 3 . VA .,r i , :. : APR 28 2 1 27 I TH E U N I ED STA TE S D I RI C OU R T N T ST CT FOR THE W ESTERN DI STRI OF W RGI A CT NI ROANOKE DI I O N V SI ' J F : $t ULI. . ' . p BY: PIPE R A .R O U N TR EE, Ca eN o.7: 5CV 00 s 1 220 Pl i if antf , Y. M EM O R AN DU M O PI O N NI HAROLD CLARKE, AL , ZI By:Ho GlnE.Co a n. e nr d ChifUnie Stt sDititJ e t d a e src udge Dee nts. fnda t) By o ni n a or r e e ed Fe ua y 1 201 t c t g a ed t de e nt ' pi o nd de nt r br r 6, 7, he our r nt he f nda s moi n frsl r j dg n . Sp cfc l t ec u t o ndt tp an if Pie Ro n re h d to o l mmay u me t e iial h o r f u ha litf, p r u te , a y, no pr e e a ge ne is of ma e i lf ti diput on whih s c d pe s de a f c t es nt d nui s ue t ra ac n s e c he oul r ua at fnde t tdef nda s polc pr bii he fom ptr ha i a mai ai ng a pe s na yoga i r ha e nt ' iy ohi tng r r lc sng nd nt ni ro l ma i he cel vi aed he rgh s t r t Consi to or t Re i ous La Us and t n r l olt r i t mde he tm i n he lgi nd e I ttto aie Pe s n Ac ($ , PA' . Ro n re h sn w mo d f rr c n ie ain a nsi in lz d ro s t 1 UI ' u RI ) u te a o ve o e o sd rto nd s kst n e he c ee o m nd r ompli wih a tona f t a a gume s The c tfndsno m e i t ant t ddii l acs nd r nt . our i rt o t m o i n and wilno pe mi n e e oft scos d a to he to l t r t m ndm nt hi l e ci n. Be aus Rot r e sgned a da e he moton wihi 28 da fom e r o t c e mte i nd t d r i t n ys r nty f he j d me t t e c u twila d e s i u d rRue 5 ()o te Fe e a Ru e o Ci lP o e t e u g n, h o r l d r s t n e l 9e f h d rl ls f vi r c dl . r Un e t snze çe o sd rto o aj d me ta trise ty i a e ta r ia yrme y whc d r hi l, i c n i eain f u g n fe t nr s n xr o dn r e d ih r s dbeus d s rngl ' .I .Co.v. Na ' FieI .Co. 1 F. 396,403 ( h Ci. houl e pa i y. 'Pac ns Am. tl r ns , 48 3d 4t r Rountree v. Clarke et al Doc. 64 1 (ntmalcttonsandquottonmakso ted) TheUnie SttsCo tofAppeasf 998) i e iai ai r mit . td ae ur l or t eF u t Cic i h srpe tdyr c n z d ta aj d me tma b a n e u d rRue 5 () h o rh rut a e ae l e og ie h t u g n y e me d d n e l 9e i onl t e crumsa es ( )t a ommodaea i e ve ngc ngei c r lnglw;( t n y hre ic tnc : 1 o cc t n ntr ni ha n ontoli a 2) o a co f ne e de eno a lbl a til or( t core tacla er of1w o pr ve c unt or w vi nc t vaia e t ra' 3) o r c e r ror a r e nt , Dockets.Justia.com CLERK ma ie t nu tc . S e e:.Ga la ov. la c S a d r LieI s Co, 4 F.d2 0 2 n. n fs ij sie e , . , cin Rein e tn a d f n . .5 7 3 3 , 41 8 ( t Ci.2 0 ) Th r l i mo t c ranl no Gn e d d t gv a u h p ltg n o e 4h r 0 8 . e u e s s e ti y t û tn e o i e n n a py i a t n i i a dto a c n et s y tej g . o s iev. I Du n d Ne t sa d Co.8 6F.d d iin l ha c o wa h ud e' swht E.. po t e moz n 'Cr r ,9 2 1 6 ,1 9 W L 1 6 6*1(t Ci.1 9 ) 36 90 58 4h r 9 0 . The c thas ca e ul r vi wed Rot r s ne s iso a fnds t t i doe our r f ly e e mtee' w ubm s i n nd i ha t s pr s nta cic sa e war ntng t r quese r if Rountee m e ey r sa e t e de e; ee r um t nc r a i he e t d ele r r l e t t s he vi nc pr des ne f c s a lbl butnotpr vi l pr s nt ,a r a gues he e ie c e. She ovi w a t , vaia e e ousy e e ed' nd e r r ntr as d e n tp e e ta y itr e i g c n e o 1w o i e tf a y ce rer ro 1w o ij sie o s o r sn n n e v n n ha g f a r d n iy n la ro f a r n u tc . Th r f r, h c u t l d n h rmo int atro a n j g n .Ana p o it o d rwil e eo e t e o r wil e y e to o l r me d ud me t e p r prae r e l i s he e ih. s ue r w t The Clr i die t d t s nd ac oft so de t t pl ntf a t c ek s rce o e opy hi r r o he ai if nd o ouns lo r c d e f e or f t de e nt . or he f nda s ENTER: Ths 11 d yo lpp.t , 01 i a f / - 2 7. Chif nie Stt sDititJ e t d a e src udge